Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(172,561 posts)
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:30 AM Aug 2025

Why Would We Assume The Next Election Will Be Free And Fair?

https://digbysblog.net/2025/08/04/why-would-we-assume-the-next-election-will-be-free-and-fair/

Why Would We Assume The Next Election Will Be Free And Fair?
Published by digby on August 4, 2025


Bookmark this from the Brennan Center as we go into the next election season:

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/trump-administrations-campaign-undermine-next-election
The Trump Administration’s Campaign to Undermine the Next Election


This resource offers the first chronicle of the Trump administration’s actions this year to undermine election integrity. They include:

attempting to rewrite election rules to burden voters and usurp control of election systems;

targeting or threatening to target election officials and others who keep elections free and fair;

supporting people who undermine election administration; and

retreating from the federal government’s role of protecting voters and the election process.

Why do we conclude this represents a concerted strategy? Among other things, President Trump tried to do this before. He was the first president to try to overturn the results of a presidential election and used federal power to do so. Institutions and key officials blocked him. These internal checks, however, are now gone, and many public officials will likely carry out the president’s will.

This campaign to undermine elections runs afoul of the U.S. Constitution. Only Congress and the states can set election rules. The executive branch, especially the Department of Justice (DOJ), is charged with enforcing federal laws. But neither the president nor the DOJ has the authority to set rules governing elections or to supervise the state and local officials who run them.

To be sure, previous elections were marred by rules and practices that hindered full participation. Restrictive voting laws (some of which had already been ruled unconstitutional), skewed maps, and bomb threats at polling places impeded the freedom to vote. Federal officials had an important role in countering disinformation and combatting racial discrimination. This federal protection for fair elections may no longer exist.

This unprecedented federal push will place new pressure on American elections and will require vigilance and actions from those determined to defend the integrity of the vote.


Yeah. Click the link for the details. All is not lost.But they aren’t going to make it easy.
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Would We Assume The Next Election Will Be Free And Fair? (Original Post) babylonsister Aug 2025 OP
Who assumes that? DFW Aug 2025 #1
Agreed JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #3
A lot of people assume that SpankMe Aug 2025 #8
Agreed. ancianita Aug 2025 #20
I don't believe that if we have a JustAnotherGen Aug 2025 #2
Absolutely. And we need to be able to enforce it too. hadEnuf Aug 2025 #19
I don't make that assumption PJMcK Aug 2025 #4
We must fight like hell to keep afloat and this time GreenWave Aug 2025 #30
100% agree with you. n/t Dixiegrrrl Aug 2025 #32
Then we fight!!!!! we roll up our sleeves, grab our signs and take to the streets. Peacetrain Aug 2025 #5
There is no way on earth this is a free and fair election - gerrymandering their way to an autocracy!! lark Aug 2025 #6
Only fools assume we still have a democracy and free/fair elections. Irish_Dem Aug 2025 #7
I am quite perplexed that some hold out hope dlilafae Aug 2025 #9
it can't be a free and fair election NJCher Aug 2025 #13
I don't Rebl2 Aug 2025 #36
Because we are Democrats. republianmushroom Aug 2025 #10
Good one!!! niyad Aug 2025 #12
I don't. Nor do I know anyone who does. niyad Aug 2025 #11
I don't but I know those who do... StarryNite Aug 2025 #15
It won't be and hasn't been for awhile. Remember 2000 and the SCOTUS choosing the President for us? jalan48 Aug 2025 #14
Exactly!!! niyad Aug 2025 #18
And some might argue that what's been happening so far is just incompetence, not malevolence. erronis Aug 2025 #16
Clearly. hay rick Aug 2025 #22
Kick! liberalla Aug 2025 #17
i know right? YoshidaYui Aug 2025 #21
What is free and fair? Not a rhetorical question EdmondDantes_ Aug 2025 #23
If we win, then the election was free and fair Kaleva Aug 2025 #24
Unfortunately for some that appears to be the metric EdmondDantes_ Aug 2025 #27
Republicans have to win at the state level.... Kaleva Aug 2025 #29
Well said SickOfTheOnePct Aug 2025 #34
Depends on what is being compromised AZProgressive Aug 2025 #35
Since 2016 KentuckyWoman Aug 2025 #25
I've thought the same thing. returnee Aug 2025 #37
We CANNOT assume this vapor2 Aug 2025 #26
There's that joke about what happens when we assume... love_katz Aug 2025 #28
We know this already. It's not rocket science. lees1975 Aug 2025 #31
I have that same thought every time I hear someone... appmanga Aug 2025 #33

SpankMe

(3,658 posts)
8. A lot of people assume that
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 10:29 AM
Aug 2025

I can't tell you how many Democrats/liberals I know and have read online who are in "hunker down until this passes" mode. They think we just need to sit through the next 3-1/2 years and that it's so bad that "no one will vote for these guys" again. Too much faith that our existing election systems will still be in operation in '28.

The crisis is existential. Republicans aren't interested in following the electorate and providing what is needed. They're interested in forcing a narrow worldview on a country they've just taken over, regardless of what the citizens want or need. It's minority rule and is about pure power and control. It's a Mao-like cultural revolution.

I disagree whole-heartedly with Dems who are saying it's about money or economics. It's about 1984-like control of people's minds and souls. It's about forcing a Christian theocracy on the country. Christian Taliban is spot on.

I am doubtful the US will come out on the other side intact.

JustAnotherGen

(37,503 posts)
2. I don't believe that if we have a
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 08:43 AM
Aug 2025

2028 election - it will be free and fair.

We are looking at Regime change by any means necessary.

To include Gerrymandering in the favor of American Patriots.

PJMcK

(24,708 posts)
4. I don't make that assumption
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:00 AM
Aug 2025

In fact, I believe one of two things will happen. Either the elections will be held but will be the most corrupt in our nation's history or Trump will declare martial law, suspend the Constitution and cancel the elections.

The trajectory of the Trump Administration is not towards openness and democracy. It's totalitarian and a dictatorship.

GreenWave

(12,230 posts)
30. We must fight like hell to keep afloat and this time
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 02:24 PM
Aug 2025

No more pussyfooting around after the victory. Those bastards are always conspiring.

Peacetrain

(24,279 posts)
5. Then we fight!!!!! we roll up our sleeves, grab our signs and take to the streets.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 09:04 AM
Aug 2025

We contribute to fight them in the courts. And we hold them accountable to the Constitution.!!

lark

(25,881 posts)
6. There is no way on earth this is a free and fair election - gerrymandering their way to an autocracy!!
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 10:19 AM
Aug 2025

Stealing it as much as possible as well. That's right now. tsf can make it far worse and you can 100% count on him to steal the election. If Starlink is involved again, it is a certainty that we lose big every time.

NJCher

(42,386 posts)
13. it can't be a free and fair election
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 10:59 AM
Aug 2025

until we get rid of electronic voting machines and go to hand counts.

republianmushroom

(22,122 posts)
10. Because we are Democrats.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 10:46 AM
Aug 2025

And we just know that the other party wouldn't do that after we extend our hand across the aisle.

jalan48

(14,914 posts)
14. It won't be and hasn't been for awhile. Remember 2000 and the SCOTUS choosing the President for us?
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:03 AM
Aug 2025

erronis

(22,592 posts)
16. And some might argue that what's been happening so far is just incompetence, not malevolence.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:05 AM
Aug 2025

hay rick

(9,328 posts)
22. Clearly.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:37 AM
Aug 2025

These folks are enemies of American democracy, enemies of the American people, and given their climate denialism in particular, enemies of humanity. If they were situated in a foreign country patriotic Americans would support sending troops to neutralize them.

liberalla

(10,796 posts)
17. Kick!
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:10 AM
Aug 2025

I would never expect that --- not with this crew. They must always have their finger (fist!) on the scale.






YoshidaYui

(44,939 posts)
21. i know right?
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:32 AM
Aug 2025

what if Trump suspends the election and the Senate and the Supreme court back him, no election, DONALD TRUMP FOR life... fuck

EdmondDantes_

(1,329 posts)
23. What is free and fair? Not a rhetorical question
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 11:39 AM
Aug 2025

By free and fair do you mean that the votes cast will be counted accurately? I believe that.

Does free and fair mean nothing that might cause someone to not vote that might have otherwise like long lines or distance to the voting station? And what's the cutoff for acceptable and unacceptable? I'm lucky and the only time I had to wait more than a few minutes to vote was the 2020 general election. Is the cutoff 10 minutes? An hour? Obviously different people have competing time restrictions, people with kids will likely have less time to spend voting.

Does it mean no gerrymandering? That's been a thing forever and people here are demanding we do more of it. Does it mean no barriers like requiring whatever documents? Again, nothing new.

Further on gerrymandering, what is the goal of efforts to fix it? Is it maximizing competitive districts? Is it closely matching the political distribution of the population at the time of the census?

I don't ask these questions to be contrarian, but to hone in on what is meant because I'm guessing people have wildly different understandings of the question.

EdmondDantes_

(1,329 posts)
27. Unfortunately for some that appears to be the metric
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 01:07 PM
Aug 2025

But I do think there's a good fundamental question about how to properly divide congressional districts and how that impacts turnout and political responsiveness. Would Republicans have turned as radical if there was pressure on them from competitive districts rather than just from a primary where the candidate is likely to be more rightward?

Would we have more bipartisanship if we had more people in Congress with a reason to compromise?

Kaleva

(40,145 posts)
29. Republicans have to win at the state level....
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 02:07 PM
Aug 2025

In Oder to Gerry meander the state in their favor.

But, if both parties strived to make districts more competitive, then we’d have candidates more open to compromise.

SickOfTheOnePct

(8,710 posts)
34. Well said
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 03:19 PM
Aug 2025

I never thought I would be for a mandated federal standard for redistricting, but that's where I'm at now.

AZProgressive

(29,819 posts)
35. Depends on what is being compromised
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 03:26 PM
Aug 2025

We can't raise the minimum wage but a bipartisan crypto bill sails through thanks to crypto lobbyists that donate to both parties and punish their critics by funding their opponents. Some of the things that both parties agree on is pretty horrible such as arming & funding Israel while it commits a genocide.

I do support independent redistricting though which is like what we have in Arizona.

KentuckyWoman

(7,365 posts)
25. Since 2016
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 12:37 PM
Aug 2025

I don't believe any of the elections were honest.

The only reason Biden won in 2020 is because Trump didn't cheat well enough. If it were honest, Biden would have won by a much greater margin.

returnee

(803 posts)
37. I've thought the same thing.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 04:12 PM
Aug 2025

We know they were trying. I think that may have something to do with why he got so mad: he thought he had it in the bag.
And why in 2024, he said he didn’t need votes. They just perfected the scheme. Musk may have been critical in it, and not just with money.

love_katz

(3,199 posts)
28. There's that joke about what happens when we assume...
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 02:03 PM
Aug 2025

However, I would add a couple of thoughts to the discussion.

Does talking about elections being canceled or stolen through cheating have a possible affect of depressing the turnout of Democrat and independent voters? Whose cause would depressing the voter turnout serve?

The Corporate owned McGreedia makes a $hit ton on money from coverage of the elections, not to mention political ads. Are they going to be willing to pass up all that loot? In return for what?
I get that many of us fear that cheating by the Guardians of Pedophiles will steal the election, but their ability to achieve that goal can be assisted by low voter turnout.
I completely understand that our side is miserably disheartened by our loss of the last election, but it seems to me that the best way for us to win is to turn out voters for our side in ginormous numbers, which would make any effort by the Greedy Old Perverts to steal the election blatantly obvious.
I'm not sure that undermining people's trust in our election process is a good strategy for motivating people to vote.
The Pukes have been handing us golden issues to achieve a Dem victory on: higher costs of living due to the tariffs being essentially a nationwide sales tax on all of us; destruction of Social Security and Medicare; higher health care costs through destruction of the ACA and Medicaid; increase of the deficit through continuing massive tax giveaways to billionaires and large corporations; removal of financial and environmental protections from anyone who isn't uber wealthy; etc, ad nauseum.
Is it really a good idea to depress voter turnout by insisting that all is lost and we should just give up in despair?
I'm with everybody who feels that way, but I don't think that convincing people that it's all rigged and we should just give up is an effective strategy.

lees1975

(6,899 posts)
31. We know this already. It's not rocket science.
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 02:32 PM
Aug 2025

They've whined and bellyached and complained and told us exactly how they are going to steal the election.

Wanna bet the Democrats lay down and let 'em do it?

appmanga

(1,378 posts)
33. I have that same thought every time I hear someone...
Tue Aug 5, 2025, 03:00 PM
Aug 2025

...talking about "Wait until the midterms" as if autocrats are going to stop doing autocratic things.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Would We Assume The N...