Zuckerberg using photos of 13-y.o. schoolgirls to lure men to Threads
This is seriously sick.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/sep/20/parents-outraged-meta-uses-photos-schoolgirls-ads-man
"META has used back-to-school pictures of schoolgirls to advertise one of its social media platforms to a 37-year-old man, in a move parents described as “outrageous” and “upsetting”.
The man noticed that posts encouraging him to “get Threads”, Mark Zuckerberg’s rival to Elon Musk’s X, were being dropped into his Instagram feed featuring embedded posts of uniformed girls as young as 13 with their faces visible and, in most cases, their names.
The children’s images were used by Meta after their parents had posted them on Instagram to mark their return to school. The parents were unaware that Meta’s settings permitted it to do this. One mother said her account was set to private, but the posts were automatically cross-posting to Threads where they were visible. Another said she posted the picture to a public Instagram account. The posts of their children were highlighted to the stranger as “suggested threads”.
The recipient told the Guardian the posts felt “deliberately provocative and ultimately exploitative of the children and families involved”.
The father of a 13-year-old who appeared in one of the posts said it was “absolutely outrageous”. The images were all of schoolgirls in short skirts with either bare legs or stockings.
“When I found out an image of her has been exploited in what felt like a sexualised way by a massive company like that to market their product it left me feeling quite disgusted,” he said."....(more)
= new reply since forum marked as read
by one of the most unattractive men on the planet. 
We need certain permissions from you to provide our services:
1. Your content: Some content that you share or upload, such as photos or videos, may be protected by intellectual property laws.
You retain ownership of the intellectual property rights (things like copyright or trademarks) in any such content that you create and share on Facebook and other you use. Nothing in these Terms takes away the rights you have to your own content. You are free to share your content with anyone else, wherever you want.
However, to provide our services we need you to give us some legal permissions (known as a "license"
to use this content. This is solely for the purposes of providing and improving our Products and services as described in Section 1 above.
2. Permission to use content you create and share: Specifically, when you share, post, or upload content that is covered by intellectual property rights on or in connection with our Products, you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, and worldwide license to host, use, distribute, modify, run, copy, publicly perform or display, translate, and create derivative works of your content (consistent with your and settings). This means, for example, that if you share a photo on Facebook, you give us permission to store, copy, and share it with others (again, consistent with your settings) such as Meta Products or service providers that support those products and services. This license will end when your content is deleted from our systems.
https://www.facebook.com/terms?section_id=section_3
Sorry, Parents. You agreed to this when you signed up to use the platform.
They conduct their social and family interactions largely through the Zuckerverse — FB, Instagram, and Threads. There are also plenty of venues and organizations that have no web presence other than those platforms, so it’s hard to access their info unless you get it by word of mouth or a random ad or flyer.
But I digress. Facebook and the other Zuckerberg platforms have such fervently dependent users (and such an ocean of cash) that they’re unlikely to face serious consequences from even such egregious behavior as that cited in the OP.
But it’s not a monopoly. And regulatory oversight would be “burdensome.”
Pedos of a feather flock together. 
Just like the 19th century trusts got crushed. Wasn't easy, but there is precedent and hope.
... this story. Maybe there are other photos, other than the one pictured... I assume robots picked the lure photos, based on clicks... If so, they need better robots! And the headline is misleading, as many are... so I fixed it:
"Zuckerberg algorithms use photos of 13-y.o. schoolgirls to lure pedophiles to Threads"
(Release the Epstein Files)
Go out and meet real people. Pick up a phone and "talk".
