The American PEOPLE will prevail. Not your phony, illegitimate Presidency ( 14th Amendment). FUCK YOU.

And he doesn't have nearly enough cops to pull that off.

is seeing to that.

We went out across the Nation from Maine to California to Hawaii on June 14th Flag Day and we're going out again on October 18.

when he told Gov. Kotek her accounts of Portland were different than the fires and things he was seeing. I don't think he seriously believed what he told her so much as he was playing dumb as a way to lie about it.

He knows that stuff isn't currently ongoing. He is just choosing to act like he believes it as a twisted form of plausible deniability.

I think he is conflating the anarchy of that point in time with the present.

Among the two known possibilities -- he was lying, or he was demented -- one is far more evidenced than the other. We know as fact that he lies with nearly every breath. We know much less about his cognitive state.

Always.

he knows Portland isn't "under siege, just as he knows all the other shit that he vomits forth are complete lies and fabrication.

It's a pretext for sending the military to fight HIS WAR on American soil.

And not just against immigrants and "criminals." Against Americans who disagree with HIM.

He's outright TOLD military top brass to be prepared to do exactly THAT.

Make that cauliflower.

They couldn’t control LA with 10,000 troops, they aren’t going to control Portland with 200.

(But I bet the streets will be free of litter!)

Trump is not omnipotent, and the states and people are not powerless.

There aren’t enough troops to disrupt or control elections, even if limited to major cities in blue states.

They may have power, but they will never have total control.

Is claim there are imaginary Antifa terrorists disrupting the election in a few Democratic stronghold cities in swing states, and then send in enough troops to scare everyone away from voting.

By the way, in the past I was critical of Garland, but I've heard Marcy Wheeler on a few podcasts and I'm understanding better that it was the Supremes and Roberts who were the actual villains there. I wasn't understanding your and Marcy's arguments, now I get them

what can't "possibly happen."

.. in the face of all that HAS happened.

There is a great potential for much chaos, destruction and chicanery, but some things simply aren’t possible with the existing resources and manpower.

threads like this get under my skin. Ain't happening for the reasons you stated. Enough with the BS fear mongering already. I'm sick and damn tired of it.

Once you do, that. Incentivizes trash💩mp to declare Martial Law. All bets are off after that. Hopefully, the 800 flag officers will not support this coup.

Don't give any photographers/videographers anything other than National Guard standing around with nothing to do.

Repeat - no provocation...be wary that anyone trying to promote conflict may be an agent for the other side.

regarding his overall plan. Can we keep this to one or two threads? Discussions about this have been taking place since March.

"Discussions about this have been taking place since March."

There are hundreds of operatives and assets awaiting orders from multiple hard-ball players.

Not enough rioting? No problem. We love doing rioting.

Many times.
How many of those making the prediction actually know what "martial law" is?
Very few, if any.

The Supreme Court long ago explained what martial law is and the limits of its implementation under the Constitution:

Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2 (1866)

"If, in foreign invasion or civil war, the courts are actually closed, and it is impossible to administer criminal justice according to law, then, on the theatre of active military operations, where war really prevails, there is a necessity to furnish a substitute for the civil authority, thus overthrown, to preserve the safety of the army and society; and as no power is left but the military, it is allowed to govern by martial rule until the laws can have their free course. As necessity creates the rule, so it limits its duration; for, if this government is continued after the courts are reinstated, it is a gross usurpation of power.Martial rule can never exist where the courts are open, and in the proper and unobstructed exercise of their jurisdiction. It is also confined to the locality of actual war."

Well okay. Thanks for the clarification. Much appreciated.

Martial Law in 2025: A Real Threat or Political Fearmongering? - MSN