General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, can we all agree that Vance's statement that he was opposed to the young Republicans
losing their jobs over boys being boys is exactly the kind of perspective that is responsible for the kind of slimy Republicans we are dealing with today?
Not in any other American group I can think of, will you find where Nazi worshiping is considered a rite of passage to maturity.
Can we just agree that the definition of a boy is somewhere between 8 and 17? After that they are considered young men and at 18, they could even face criminal actions as an adult. The Young Republicans involved young men between the ages of 18 and 29,
I bet they're confused because their adult role models chuckle whenever they hear them say the same things. What they learned, was that they shouldn't be so obvious until they're president.
wcmagumba
(5,661 posts)Trump has been said to keep a copy of Hitler's writings by his bedside in a little cabinet of some sort...WTF is wrong with these people?
Deuxcents
(25,549 posts)Baitball Blogger
(51,744 posts)multigraincracker
(37,017 posts)BlueWaveNeverEnd
(12,903 posts)lastlib
(27,571 posts)"slimy" ain't the half of it.
Jack Valentino
(4,381 posts)who happened to get himself killed.... according the 'Couch-fucking' Vance!
Grins
(9,246 posts)Peter Giunta is 31
Joe Maligno is 35
Remember - Young Republicans is not the same as College Republicans.
soldierant
(9,287 posts)up to age 40 but even up to 29, I agree is not "boys" Also, there were a couple of women involved in that chat.
Ilsa
(63,855 posts)JD hold his kids accountable for their bad behavior?