Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(80,088 posts)
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 01:36 PM Nov 2025

...Trump is calling Mace & Boebert today pleading with them to remove their names from the Epstein petition

Well, this afternoon may be interesting to say the least. ---or maybe not.

Ron Filipkowski‬
‪@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social‬
· 23m
The fact that Trump is calling Mace and Boebert today pleading with them to remove their names from the Epstein petition at the last minute tells you everything you need to know about how incriminating the info in the files is to him and his cronies.


?s=20



Ron Filipkowski
@RonFilipkowski
·
37m
Trump desperately pressuring Republicans who signed the Epstein petition before Grijalva signs it at 4:10 PM when it will then be too late to stop it.

?s=20



?s=20





38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
...Trump is calling Mace & Boebert today pleading with them to remove their names from the Epstein petition (Original Post) riversedge Nov 2025 OP
I wonder what the price leadership is willing to fork over. Torchlight Nov 2025 #1
I am certain that both Mace and Boebert have secrets they wish to keep hidden. Irish_Dem Nov 2025 #19
Yeah, I don't think the word "pleading" is what is going to happen. hamsterjill Nov 2025 #23
Exactly. The correct verb is THREATENING. Irish_Dem Nov 2025 #27
We really need brave whistle blowers to get the files out...they will need new identities from witness protection... wcmagumba Nov 2025 #2
I predicted weeks ago that Mace would pull her name. rsdsharp Nov 2025 #3
It would be completely hypocritical of Mace to back down. Renew Deal Nov 2025 #4
Check their bank accounts! Chasstev365 Nov 2025 #7
Bwaaaah malaise Nov 2025 #5
No. What was it? Ocelot II Nov 2025 #6
From -18.20 malaise Nov 2025 #10
My fav altered pic of Karoline. area51 Nov 2025 #31
Love it 😀 malaise Nov 2025 #33
For the love of God: will someone just leak the Epstein Files already? Chasstev365 Nov 2025 #8
We could use an Assange or Snowden or Manning round about now. TheRickles Nov 2025 #13
That would really be a surprise... kentuck Nov 2025 #9
I expect if it comes to it he will threaten their lives. BannonsLiver Nov 2025 #14
I would bet he already has rurallib Nov 2025 #17
If, just what if, they refuse to change their minds? GusBob Nov 2025 #15
Both Mace and Boebert are very weak and not very bright. Irish_Dem Nov 2025 #20
If the price is right they will fold like lawn chairs. Irish_Dem Nov 2025 #28
I've been expecting this. Bozvotros Nov 2025 #11
I figure the fix was in. doc03 Nov 2025 #12
With all the time in the world, Mblaze Nov 2025 #16
If the Epstein Files exonerated him, Trump would be threatening to primary the two if they didn't release the files surfered Nov 2025 #18
I would not be surprised if one or the other caves. Trump is very powerful, and can provide financial incentives and/or Fil1957 Nov 2025 #21
He can team them up with some of his shadowy "republican mega-donors." NBachers Nov 2025 #22
They only have about an hour left to remove their signature(s) Wiz Imp Nov 2025 #24
I don't believe either will remove their signatures at this point, however, even if one did Wiz Imp Nov 2025 #25
Pleading or Traildogbob Nov 2025 #26
My $1 bet is on... WestMichRad Nov 2025 #29
He could make Mikey expel either Mace, MTG or Boebert on the grounds of mental instability and moral turpitude. Marcuse Nov 2025 #30
Yes and that would almost guarantee that Jefferies becomes speaker in January karynnj Nov 2025 #34
Kick dalton99a Nov 2025 #32
Seriously you guys thought we wouldn't get fitzmased ? mucifer Nov 2025 #35
K&R BlueWavePsych Nov 13 #36
There are some interesting dynamics to this, but one of them is Jbraybarten Nov 13 #37
"pleading?" garybeck Nov 13 #38

Torchlight

(6,529 posts)
1. I wonder what the price leadership is willing to fork over.
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 01:39 PM
Nov 2025

Or what the leverage is against the two.

Or (most likely) a little of both.

hamsterjill

(17,207 posts)
23. Yeah, I don't think the word "pleading" is what is going to happen.
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 03:00 PM
Nov 2025

Trump is going to be threatening them; not pleading with them.

GusBob

(8,190 posts)
15. If, just what if, they refuse to change their minds?
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 02:31 PM
Nov 2025

But if they did, would they then take the rap for the cover-up?

They shoulda kept this arm twisting stuff private

Bozvotros

(955 posts)
11. I've been expecting this.
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 02:13 PM
Nov 2025

Boebert and Mace have been softened up to fold already. Today they're just going to hear the specifics of "or else."

Mblaze

(939 posts)
16. With all the time in the world,
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 02:36 PM
Nov 2025

Republicans will never come up with a better program than the ACA. The only real answer is Single-Payer and they seem to be "over my dead body" about that.

surfered

(12,413 posts)
18. If the Epstein Files exonerated him, Trump would be threatening to primary the two if they didn't release the files
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 02:42 PM
Nov 2025

Fil1957

(630 posts)
21. I would not be surprised if one or the other caves. Trump is very powerful, and can provide financial incentives and/or
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 02:50 PM
Nov 2025

serious threats. "Silver or lead" as the saying goes. However, he has been weakened by recent events, and the chances of them holding firm are better today than they were a few months ago.

Wiz Imp

(9,363 posts)
24. They only have about an hour left to remove their signature(s)
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 03:16 PM
Nov 2025

As soon as the petition receives 218 signature, it is officially entered into the record and members can no longer remove their signature.

Grijalva is set to be sworn in around 4:00 pm and as soon as that happens, my understanding is she will immediately sign the petition.

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45920

Members may add or remove their names until a petition has obtained 218 signatures. If a discharge petition reaches this threshold—a majority of the House's 435 Members—the list of names is frozen, printed in the Congressional Record, and the discharge motion is entered in the House Journal and in the "Calendar of Motions to Discharge Committees" section of the House Calendar. Once on the Calendar, an additional seven legislative days must elapse before a Member who signed the petition may notify the House in a floor statement of an intention to offer the discharge motion on the floor. The motion may then be called up by that Member "at a time or place, designated by the Speaker, in the legislative schedule within two legislative days after the day on which a Member whose signature appears thereon announces to the House an intention to offer the motion."5 A discharge motion is not in order, however, during the last six days of a congressional session.

Wiz Imp

(9,363 posts)
25. I don't believe either will remove their signatures at this point, however, even if one did
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 03:24 PM
Nov 2025

there will be another Democrat elected to the House via a Special Election Runoff in Texas in January (both candidates in the runoff are Democrats). There is also a Special Election in December in Tennessee which is likely to be won by the Republican, but there is at least an extremely slight but nonzero chance for the Democrat to win.

Traildogbob

(12,755 posts)
26. Pleading or
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 03:28 PM
Nov 2025

Threatening their lives. I suspect door number 2.
Cave or the hounds of hell will rip you and your families into hamberder meat.

Marcuse

(8,852 posts)
30. He could make Mikey expel either Mace, MTG or Boebert on the grounds of mental instability and moral turpitude.
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 03:55 PM
Nov 2025

Resulting in a 217-217 tie. The cover up is complete.

My money is on MTG because she’s been a pain in his bountiful butt over the shutdown, the Georgia Senate race and Epstein. Plus she didn’t get a pleading presidential call.

karynnj

(60,834 posts)
34. Yes and that would almost guarantee that Jefferies becomes speaker in January
Wed Nov 12, 2025, 05:07 PM
Nov 2025

In addition to a possible court case, it would take months to replace them. Right now there are 219 Republicans and 214 Democrats with 2 vacant seats. There would then be 217 Republicans to our 214 if they were expelled. One of the vacant seats is a run off in January between 2 Democrats, the other is the TN seat where Republicans are favored.

So, until elections to replace these two, on any piece of legislation, he could lose at most ONE representative and if, in a miracle, we win TN, he can't lose any with 217 R to 216 D. Not to mention, given their dysfunction, could we get one Republican to become independent and caucus with us?

Jbraybarten

(216 posts)
37. There are some interesting dynamics to this, but one of them is
Thu Nov 13, 2025, 11:48 AM
Nov 13

several Rs are invested in this and it's not really simple to just say no now, even by their shameless standards.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»...Trump is calling Mace ...