General Discussion

riversedge

(80,348 posts) Sat Nov 15, 2025, 07:26 PM Nov 2025

🚨 #BREAKINGNEWS There are audio recordings missing from the James Comey grand jury proceedings that haven't been turned

Maybe the tapes were being changed????

@FordJohnathan5
🚨 #BREAKINGNEWS There are audio recordings missing from the James Comey grand jury proceedings that haven't been turned over to Judge overseeing the case. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Halligan had no clear reason why this happened. This could also lead to a dismissal. 🚨

Link to tweet

?s=20

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

🚨 #BREAKINGNEWS There are audio recordings missing from the James Comey grand jury proceedings that haven't been turned (Original Post) riversedge Nov 2025 OP

Bondi JBTaurus83 Nov 2025 #1

After seeing this week's Epstein emails, I'm more convinced that tsf chicoescuela Nov 2025 #2

There is no doubt in my mind about this! bluestarone Nov 2025 #4

Apparently he can kill anyone he wishes. SCROTUS isn't going to stop him. chicoescuela Nov 2025 #7

Is that what you call a break in the chain of evidence? Baitball Blogger Nov 2025 #3

Two of the three Stooges are prosecuting this case!? sheshe2 Nov 2025 #5

Only the best people for this regime, only the best. MarineCombatEngineer Nov 2025 #6

Grounds for dismissal and reporting Halligan and Bondi to the Bar. Sneederbunk Nov 2025 #8

Their evil is outweighed only by their incompetence.. Fil1957 Nov 2025 #9

I would vote for Old Crank Nov 2025 #11

Seems to be a pattern Old Crank Nov 2025 #10

Halligan has offered an explanation onenote Nov 2025 #12

JBTaurus83

(1,063 posts)

1. Bondi

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 07:52 PM

Nov 2025

Seems to like deleting tape. Same with what happened with Epstein.

chicoescuela

(2,953 posts)

2. After seeing this week's Epstein emails, I'm more convinced that tsf

Reply to JBTaurus83 (Reply #1)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 08:01 PM

Nov 2025

had Epstein eliminated.

bluestarone

(21,940 posts)

4. There is no doubt in my mind about this!

Reply to chicoescuela (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 08:05 PM

Nov 2025

He continues to kill Americans everyday.

chicoescuela

(2,953 posts)

7. Apparently he can kill anyone he wishes. SCROTUS isn't going to stop him.

Reply to bluestarone (Reply #4)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 08:47 PM

Nov 2025

Rs in Congress ain’t going to do anything either

Baitball Blogger

(52,071 posts)

3. Is that what you call a break in the chain of evidence?

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 08:02 PM

Nov 2025

sheshe2

(96,988 posts)

5. Two of the three Stooges are prosecuting this case!?

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 08:07 PM

Nov 2025

The defense says:

MarineCombatEngineer

(17,962 posts)

6. Only the best people for this regime, only the best.

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 08:10 PM

Nov 2025

Sneederbunk

(17,410 posts)

8. Grounds for dismissal and reporting Halligan and Bondi to the Bar.

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 09:31 PM

Nov 2025

Fil1957

(655 posts)

9. Their evil is outweighed only by their incompetence..

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 10:01 PM

Nov 2025

Old Crank

(6,840 posts)

11. I would vote for

Reply to Fil1957 (Reply #9)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 10:21 PM

Nov 2025

Deliberately malfeasance.

Old Crank

(6,840 posts)

10. Seems to be a pattern

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 10:20 PM

Nov 2025

With this administration. Can't seem to keep required records.

onenote

(46,098 posts)

12. Halligan has offered an explanation

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Sat Nov 15, 2025, 10:57 PM

Nov 2025

According to a statement filed by Halligan with the court, there are no missing recordings or transcripts because during the period in question, the prosecution and the court reporter left the room so that the grand jury could deliberate -- a process that is done in secret without the presence of anyone other than the members of the grand jury.

We will see whether this explanation satisfies the judge.

Reply to this discussion