Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Chasstev365

(7,140 posts)
Thu Dec 18, 2025, 12:33 PM Dec 18

Agree or disagree: If Bondi's DOJ won't release the Epstein Files:

House Democrats should release EVERYTHING THEY HAVE, no matter how awful or who is exposed!

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Agree or disagree: If Bondi's DOJ won't release the Epstein Files: (Original Post) Chasstev365 Dec 18 OP
Agree. OLDMDDEM Dec 18 #1
Why are they holding back? Silent Type Dec 18 #2
maybe trying to keep up the public interest rampartd Dec 18 #8
Playing 5D chess? We haven't been particularly successful with that, but who knows? Silent Type Dec 18 #9
I suspect someone knows what they are doing and is keeping a "timeline" on this project 2025 rampartd Dec 18 #10
Disagree because Coldwater Dec 18 #3
That has nothing to do with the info the House Democrats have Wiz Imp Dec 18 #5
Agreed Coldwater Dec 18 #7
Disagree Wiz Imp Dec 18 #4
If it's a picture of somebody with a minor, or discussing minors in a sexual context, then for sure YES! AZJonnie Dec 18 #6

rampartd

(3,850 posts)
10. I suspect someone knows what they are doing and is keeping a "timeline" on this project 2025
Thu Dec 18, 2025, 02:55 PM
Dec 18

maybe a war room at heritage?

on time and under budget.

Coldwater

(957 posts)
3. Disagree because
Thu Dec 18, 2025, 12:40 PM
Dec 18

The FBI spent over $850k in overtime for agents to erase Trumps name from the Epstein files.

Wiz Imp

(9,016 posts)
5. That has nothing to do with the info the House Democrats have
Thu Dec 18, 2025, 12:45 PM
Dec 18

The House Democrats have not received those redacted files.

Wiz Imp

(9,016 posts)
4. Disagree
Thu Dec 18, 2025, 12:41 PM
Dec 18

They can't release anything that would expose and potentially harm any victims. I agree with releasing everything else, though.

AZJonnie

(2,839 posts)
6. If it's a picture of somebody with a minor, or discussing minors in a sexual context, then for sure YES!
Thu Dec 18, 2025, 12:47 PM
Dec 18

But I'm personally not super-interested in seeing everyone in the world he was ever in a picture with, or even that travelled on the plane, get blasted by the public.

The reason for the latter being that the pilots testified as federal prosecution witnesses against Maxwell in her criminal case saying they never saw any minors apart from Guiffre flying on the plane (asserting they didn't know at the time she was only 17), or evidence of any sexual activity on the plane, and that they were 100% free to move about the cabin on every flight.

Pics and/or messages of everyone who can at least tangentially be associated with his attacks on minors I agree 100%, but I'm not calling for "everyone who ever knew or spoke to the guy" because I'm not generally a fan of guilt by association.

I mean, a pic of Chomsky and Epstein was released today. Do I think Chomsky was involved? Fuck no. Do I think he knew and said nothing? I also highly doubt it.

So no, not "everyone", with no filter or discretion. MHO I've already shared, and I know some of you disagree, that's fine. This would be my vote on the topic of the OP.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Agree or disagree: If Bon...