Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lostincalifornia

(4,916 posts)
Thu Dec 18, 2025, 08:59 PM Dec 18

As dangerous eugenic ideas spread, NIH falls silent

Alex Bates was lying on her couch on a Friday afternoon when her phone began blowing up. It was a moment she and her colleagues had spent years preparing for: James Watson had died. When she joined the National Human Genome Research Institute in 2019 as the head of its communications office, how the agency should discuss its former director — an icon of biology for his co-discovery of the structure of DNA — was one of the first things she was charged with tackling.

Tucked away on a government server were drafts of opinion pieces, talking points its scientists could make in interviews, and a statement from the agency’s director. This elaborate PR campaign was prepared for two reasons: Watson had been a powerful advocate for the Human Genome Project and its first director, and was, quite literally, the reason NHGRI existed. But Watson’s unrepentant beliefs in scientific racism and sexism, which had poisoned his own legacy, wouldn’t die with him. If anything, they were making a comeback.

Advertisement
Even before President Trump’s return to power illuminated a new wave of racist, anti-immigrant, transphobic sentiments, eugenic ideas and rhetoric had been ramping up in the U.S., driven by anxieties about low birth rates and the arrival of genetic technologies that promise prospective parents new powers of offspring “optimization.” Amid this resurgence, NHGRI’s leadership had taken a public stance against scientific racism and eugenics — driven by the technologies’ dubious evidence and ethics, and their potential to discourage historically marginalized groups from participating in genomics research, threatening the future of personalized medicine.

But when Watson died in November at age 97, NHGRI did not put out any of the materials Bates and her team had prepared. There was no one left in its communication office to do that. Bates and everyone who had worked there, along with the entirety of NHGRI’s education and outreach offices, had been fired months before as part of the Trump administration’s efforts to restructure the federal government.



https://www.statnews.com/2025/12/18/trump-nih-cuts-nhgri-special-report-american-science-shattered/

and sexism can also be added to the epitaph, since it was Rosalind Franklin's work which led Crick and Wilkins to the double helix of DNA from her work in x-ray diffraction.

Not only was Franklin's name omitted, but her fundamental role was not acknowledged at the time, and her work was included from Watson and Crick without her knowledge or consent, which accelerated their discovery.


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As dangerous eugenic ideas spread, NIH falls silent (Original Post) lostincalifornia Dec 18 OP
Don't forget that the infamous case of Buck v Bell is approaching its centennial. no_hypocrisy Dec 18 #1
I watched this documentary recently canetoad Dec 18 #2

no_hypocrisy

(54,302 posts)
1. Don't forget that the infamous case of Buck v Bell is approaching its centennial.
Thu Dec 18, 2025, 09:09 PM
Dec 18

Yes, the case that went to the USSC that legitimized state-sponsored vasectomies and tubal ligations to ensure that the wrong people could not reproduce. You know, sterilize them. Against the wills of the victims. Without telling them what was happening.

And the case has not been overturned. It can be regenerated if, say, a state like Florida, wanted to bring it back.

canetoad

(20,241 posts)
2. I watched this documentary recently
Thu Dec 18, 2025, 09:29 PM
Dec 18

And luckily it's posted in full on YouTube. Not short - nearly 2 hours. Compelling viewing. About the eugenics movement in America earlier last century and how it became a popular belief - "improving" the human race. It's really worth a watch.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As dangerous eugenic idea...