Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAs dangerous eugenic ideas spread, NIH falls silent
Alex Bates was lying on her couch on a Friday afternoon when her phone began blowing up. It was a moment she and her colleagues had spent years preparing for: James Watson had died. When she joined the National Human Genome Research Institute in 2019 as the head of its communications office, how the agency should discuss its former director an icon of biology for his co-discovery of the structure of DNA was one of the first things she was charged with tackling.
Tucked away on a government server were drafts of opinion pieces, talking points its scientists could make in interviews, and a statement from the agencys director. This elaborate PR campaign was prepared for two reasons: Watson had been a powerful advocate for the Human Genome Project and its first director, and was, quite literally, the reason NHGRI existed. But Watsons unrepentant beliefs in scientific racism and sexism, which had poisoned his own legacy, wouldnt die with him. If anything, they were making a comeback.
Advertisement
Even before President Trumps return to power illuminated a new wave of racist, anti-immigrant, transphobic sentiments, eugenic ideas and rhetoric had been ramping up in the U.S., driven by anxieties about low birth rates and the arrival of genetic technologies that promise prospective parents new powers of offspring optimization. Amid this resurgence, NHGRIs leadership had taken a public stance against scientific racism and eugenics driven by the technologies dubious evidence and ethics, and their potential to discourage historically marginalized groups from participating in genomics research, threatening the future of personalized medicine.
But when Watson died in November at age 97, NHGRI did not put out any of the materials Bates and her team had prepared. There was no one left in its communication office to do that. Bates and everyone who had worked there, along with the entirety of NHGRIs education and outreach offices, had been fired months before as part of the Trump administrations efforts to restructure the federal government.
Tucked away on a government server were drafts of opinion pieces, talking points its scientists could make in interviews, and a statement from the agencys director. This elaborate PR campaign was prepared for two reasons: Watson had been a powerful advocate for the Human Genome Project and its first director, and was, quite literally, the reason NHGRI existed. But Watsons unrepentant beliefs in scientific racism and sexism, which had poisoned his own legacy, wouldnt die with him. If anything, they were making a comeback.
Advertisement
Even before President Trumps return to power illuminated a new wave of racist, anti-immigrant, transphobic sentiments, eugenic ideas and rhetoric had been ramping up in the U.S., driven by anxieties about low birth rates and the arrival of genetic technologies that promise prospective parents new powers of offspring optimization. Amid this resurgence, NHGRIs leadership had taken a public stance against scientific racism and eugenics driven by the technologies dubious evidence and ethics, and their potential to discourage historically marginalized groups from participating in genomics research, threatening the future of personalized medicine.
But when Watson died in November at age 97, NHGRI did not put out any of the materials Bates and her team had prepared. There was no one left in its communication office to do that. Bates and everyone who had worked there, along with the entirety of NHGRIs education and outreach offices, had been fired months before as part of the Trump administrations efforts to restructure the federal government.
https://www.statnews.com/2025/12/18/trump-nih-cuts-nhgri-special-report-american-science-shattered/
and sexism can also be added to the epitaph, since it was Rosalind Franklin's work which led Crick and Wilkins to the double helix of DNA from her work in x-ray diffraction.
Not only was Franklin's name omitted, but her fundamental role was not acknowledged at the time, and her work was included from Watson and Crick without her knowledge or consent, which accelerated their discovery.
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As dangerous eugenic ideas spread, NIH falls silent (Original Post)
lostincalifornia
Dec 18
OP
Don't forget that the infamous case of Buck v Bell is approaching its centennial.
no_hypocrisy
Dec 18
#1
no_hypocrisy
(54,302 posts)1. Don't forget that the infamous case of Buck v Bell is approaching its centennial.
Yes, the case that went to the USSC that legitimized state-sponsored vasectomies and tubal ligations to ensure that the wrong people could not reproduce. You know, sterilize them. Against the wills of the victims. Without telling them what was happening.
And the case has not been overturned. It can be regenerated if, say, a state like Florida, wanted to bring it back.
canetoad
(20,241 posts)2. I watched this documentary recently
And luckily it's posted in full on YouTube. Not short - nearly 2 hours. Compelling viewing. About the eugenics movement in America earlier last century and how it became a popular belief - "improving" the human race. It's really worth a watch.