Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(132,849 posts)
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 08:33 PM Dec 20

How brokers gamed the ACA marketplace, roiling subsidy debate in Congress

The Florida insurance brokers offered an enticing deal to unemployed and homeless people: Enroll in a Healthcare.gov health plan they weren’t eligible for in exchange for gift cards, food, alcohol or cash. They coached them to lie about their income to qualify for heavily subsidized coverage, according to court documents. Sometimes they enrolled people without their knowledge.

A federal jury convicted Cory Lloyd and Steven Strong last month of collecting millions of dollars in commissions between 2018 and 2022 through a widespread plot to defraud the federal insurance marketplace. People earning at least the federal poverty level can get income-based subsidies to help them afford monthly premiums for plans sold through the Affordable Care Act. Under Lloyd and Strong’s scheme, the federal government paid at least $180 million in ineligible subsidies.

Many more agents and brokers - likely thousands, according to two career staffers at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak to press - are gaming the marketplace where 24 million Americans get health insurance.

Corruption among Healthcare.gov agents and brokers had emerged as a sticking point in Washington as Congress failed to reach a deal to halt the year-end expiration of enhanced subsidies for insurance premiums, which will drive up the cost of plans for millions of Americans. Republicans invoked the fraud to argue against extending the subsidies while Democrats said the solution is better enforcement rather than withholding assistance from Americans who need it.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/brokers-gamed-aca-marketplace-roiling-155907015.html

Sounds like a Rick Scott type scam.

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How brokers gamed the ACA marketplace, roiling subsidy debate in Congress (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Dec 20 OP
Read about this the other day dweller Dec 20 #1

dweller

(27,840 posts)
1. Read about this the other day
Sat Dec 20, 2025, 08:57 PM
Dec 20

Was surprised it wasn’t breaking news somewhere …

Fake Obamacare accounts got $2,350/month from US taxpayers, watchdog finds. Why experts say it’s no bombshell
Bombshell, or bust? That’s the question hanging over a recent preliminary report from the Government Accountability Office about Affordable Care Act subsidy fraud.

The nonpartisan watchdog’s report (1), which dropped in early December, is based in part on findings from 2024 and 2025 during which time the Government Accountability Office (GAO) employed “fictitious applicants” to apply for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) advance premium tax credit (APTC) — a federal subsidy program that pays directly to insurance companies to help lower individual premiums on Marketplace plans.

They found that, in 2024, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) paid subsidies for all four of their fake applicants, totaling roughly $2,350 a month — despite some of those “applicants” failing to provide citizenship documentation or Social Security numbers (SSNs). In 2025 the GAO enrolled 20 fake applicants with the CMS — 18 of which still receive APTCs that combine for more than $10,000 a month.

In addition, the report found that a total of 29,000 SSNs received “more than one year's worth of insurance coverage with APTC in a single plan year” in 2023, with another roughly 66,000 doing the same in 2024, meaning the same SSNs were used multiple times to receive benefits.
The findings also showed that brokers or insurance agents likely changed, without authorization, 30,000 or more coverage applications in 2023 and 160,000 in 2024, which “can result in consumer harm, including loss of access to medications.”

The GAO report was requested by three Congressional Republicans who released a statement (2) saying that it demonstrates “rampant waste, fraud, and abuse,” with Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan stating, that, “under Obamacare, hardworking Americans saw their premiums skyrocket and their health care choices shrink, all while fraud benefitted insurance companies.”

Taking the pulse of health care fraud in the U.S.

In an interview with KFF Health News (3), Seto J. Bagdoyan, one of the GAO report’s authors, cautioned that the findings only focus on “indicators of potential fraud” rather than conclusive evidence. And the report itself offers some important context to the big numbers that made headlines.

For example, the full 26-page preliminary report (4) specifies that the 30,000 applications affected by “unauthorized changes” in 2023, and the 160,000 in 2024, represent only 0.4% and 1.5% of all applications in those respective years.

And as for the duplicate SSNs, the roughly 29,000 from 2023 account for only 0.21% of all SSNs that received subsidies that year. The 66,000 duplicate SSNs in 2024 only accounted for 0.37%. Beyond representing less than 1% of all SSNs inputted, the report notes that the duplicates could also be a result of “data entry errors” and that further investigation is required.

It really is trivial, the scope of fraud,” Lehigh University professor of health policy Michael Gusmano told CNBC about the report (5). “It’s just a scare tactic to justify the reduction of the federal government’s role in subsidizing health insurance.”



I don’t have a link , since it was a report in my email news digest but the link was to moneywise.com


Bold/italics mine

✌🏻

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How brokers gamed the ACA...