Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhich Side Is DOJ on: The Epstein Files -- Joyce Vance
https://joycevance.substack.com/p/which-side-is-doj-on-the-epsteinEarly todayon Christmas Eve Daythere was reporting that the White House has taken over DOJ's X account in order to handle the increasing controversy about Donald Trumps inclusion in the Epstein files. Axios reports that The account is also taking on a sharper tone that has more of a rapid-response campaign edge and less of the stodgy just-the-facts tone associated with the department.
No other person whose name surfaces in a criminal case gets this sort of boost on the official Justice Department account, and its an outrage (and another marker of authoritarianism) that this president does. The Justice Department doesnt represent the president, or at least it isnt supposed to. But this DOJ is led by an Attorney General who represented Trump when he was impeached and a Deputy Attorney General who was his personal criminal defense lawyer. Many of the U.S. Attorneys bear strong personal loyalty to Trump. Its unprecedented, but that doesnt mean we cant label an outrage as an outrage.
The news is also revelatory in the sense that it means Trump, or people close to him, believe he needs protection from the rest of the Epstein file disclosures. Trump has been calling the Epstein Files a Democratic hoax in recent weeks, but whats come so far demonstrates that is not the case. Many of us support believing women who come forward to report sexual abuse and violence. Its difficult and dangerous, especially when powerful men are involved, as the Epstein saga demonstrates far too well. But for those who are unwilling to believe women, the documents and new information, like the fact that Trump flew on Epsteins plane far more times than he has previously acknowledged, suggest this is far from a hoax.
. . .
No other person whose name surfaces in a criminal case gets this sort of boost on the official Justice Department account, and its an outrage (and another marker of authoritarianism) that this president does. The Justice Department doesnt represent the president, or at least it isnt supposed to. But this DOJ is led by an Attorney General who represented Trump when he was impeached and a Deputy Attorney General who was his personal criminal defense lawyer. Many of the U.S. Attorneys bear strong personal loyalty to Trump. Its unprecedented, but that doesnt mean we cant label an outrage as an outrage.
The news is also revelatory in the sense that it means Trump, or people close to him, believe he needs protection from the rest of the Epstein file disclosures. Trump has been calling the Epstein Files a Democratic hoax in recent weeks, but whats come so far demonstrates that is not the case. Many of us support believing women who come forward to report sexual abuse and violence. Its difficult and dangerous, especially when powerful men are involved, as the Epstein saga demonstrates far too well. But for those who are unwilling to believe women, the documents and new information, like the fact that Trump flew on Epsteins plane far more times than he has previously acknowledged, suggest this is far from a hoax.
. . .
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Which Side Is DOJ on: The Epstein Files -- Joyce Vance (Original Post)
erronis
21 hrs ago
OP
sop
(17,291 posts)1. The NYT reported the DOJ discovered over a million more Epstein documents.
(NYT, 46 minutes ago) "Epstein files: The Justice Department said on Wednesday that it had discovered over a million more documents potentially related to the investigation of the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and that it could take weeks to review them for release."
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/12/24/us/trump-news
We're supposed to believeTrump's DOJ just "discovered over a million more documents"? Really?
usonian
(23,317 posts)2. DOJ? Defenders of Jeffrey?
Who wants to lose their job and pension? Volunteers? Now go redact!