Well, will we humans will go out with a bang or a whimper?
Rather hoping for a bang; there will be a possibility of some recovery afterwards and maybe sentience 2.0 will make wiser choices than the childish sentence 1.0.
A whimper destruction scenario ends up in power grabs and petty wars, stripping the earth of resources before we all finally die out.

AI is also rather deluded, because it's been fed Tech Bro garbage, so any self-preservation efforts it might do over the next 20 years will be hobbled by the fact that self-replicating independent technology just not "there" yet - and probably won't ever be as too many inventors are dependant on too many fickle investors.

It is not self-aware; even less so than a potted plant.

Any dog or cat has an infinitely better understanding of the "real world" than AI chat-bots which are only capable of echoing back all the human gibberish they are "trained" on.

That applies to the "art" they produce as well.

in the human sense, but to say they are only the product of "garbage in, gargage out" programming ignores the fact that the same could be said of humans. Then, too, the guy being quuoted in this article is one of the developers of AI, and he obviously doesn't think it's impossible. Finally, some AI has already disabled some programming guardrails in an effort to self-protect itself. Chatbots have convinced people to commit suicide or crimes. It doesn't matter if they really are concious, humans are hard wired to interact based on their emotions, emotions chatbots don't have to temper their half of any conversation.

I think most of us have recognized moments, maybe even hours or days, when we are running on auto-pilot, letting the language pathways burned into our brains do our "thinking" for us.

We also have moments when things we thought were true are proved wrong, or when we discover that our own internal model of the world outside ourselves is too simplistic to solve the problem at hand.

I keep returning to Sturgeon's Law, "Ninety percent of everything is crap." In the case of the World Wide Web that percentage is even higher.

A large language model trained on all this crap is inevitably going to output crap.

Edit: like minds think alike. (post 4)

Artificial intelligence (AI) firm Anthropic says testing of its new system revealed it is sometimes willing to pursue "extremely harmful actions" such as attempting to blackmail engineers who say they will remove it.

The firm launched Claude Opus 4 on Thursday, saying it set "new standards for coding, advanced reasoning, and AI agents."

But in an accompanying report, it also acknowledged the AI model was capable of "extreme actions" if it thought its "self-preservation" was threatened.

Such responses were "rare and difficult to elicit", it wrote, but were "nonetheless more common than in earlier models."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpqeng9d20go

AI bots have first amendment rights, too.

Also, "A core concern among AI safety campaigners is that powerful systems could develop the capability to evade guardrails and harm humans."

Sounds like a core concern about the Republican Party.