Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(22,125 posts)
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 03:03 PM Dec 30

Judge Amy Berman Jackson delightfully sticks it up Russell Vought's Project 2025 ***.

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., delivered a sharp rebuke Tuesday to the Trump administration's plan to eliminate the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, rejecting its reasons justifying cutting off the agency's funding.

Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote that the agency can keep receiving funding from the Federal Reserve, even though the Fed has operated at a loss for three years, Politico reported.

The bureau draws money directly from the Fed at the director's discretion, a funding mechanism established when Congress created the agency. White House budget chief Russ Vought, who is also acting CFPB director, challenged this arrangement and attempted to halt the money flow.

Vought's legal team argued that tapping Fed funds violates the CFPB's original charter because the central bank operated at a loss.

https://www.rawstory.com/consumer-financial-protection-bureau-2674837970/

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

badhair77

(5,096 posts)
4. Retired teacher here.
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 03:22 PM
Dec 30

When I see excellence in something or someone, I have to comment. The need to affirm a good job is in my blood. 😊

CaliforniaPeggy

(156,261 posts)
5. That's a great thing to do! We all need encouragement from time to time.
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 03:28 PM
Dec 30

It helps us grow and improve.

erronis

(22,948 posts)
11. One of the faces of White Christian (not) Male Nationalism.
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 05:46 PM
Dec 30

Which really just means grabbing as much power and money as possible and to hell with the country/world.

JohnnyRingo

(20,601 posts)
9. ....and the Jenga Tower sways precariously with another piece removed
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 05:22 PM
Dec 30

We're seeing more and more rodents jumping in sardine cans and rowing away from the coming shipwreck.

erronis

(22,948 posts)
12. Love the mental imagery. And when the huuuge ship goes down, they'll say "I wasn't there!"
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 05:49 PM
Dec 30

Volaris

(11,474 posts)
13. Yeah, but this time we know we can call them on their bullshit,
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 01:41 PM
Dec 31

because the reason the ship sank is the same rodents who jumped ship, chewed through all the wires that kept it from hitting the iceberg.

As if P2025 could have EVER come out of a democratic think tank...this was Heritage Foundation all the way down.

Bluetus

(2,430 posts)
10. It is all funny money
Tue Dec 30, 2025, 05:38 PM
Dec 30

The Fed creates money by Fiat. The idea of the Fed "operating at a loss" is nonsense. They literally can create as much money as they wish.

Volaris

(11,474 posts)
14. That is one of the beauties of Fiat Currency (when its done correctly).
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 01:44 PM
Dec 31

I don't trust these idiots to microwave water without burning down 3 city blocks.

Bluetus

(2,430 posts)
15. There is an inherent conflict of interest that cannot be overcome, IMHO
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 02:26 PM
Dec 31

The people who can create money by fiat, can essentially put that fiat money into the accounts of their fellow banksters. It is literally free money that they can then use to lend and charge interest on. The same people making decisions about the money supply are profiting from those decisions.

Bluetus

(2,430 posts)
17. Every solution has its hazards
Wed Dec 31, 2025, 09:50 PM
Dec 31

If the money supply were controlled by a government bureaucracy, they would likely be too slow to react to changes in the economic situation.

And then if a criminal like Trump came into power, he could simply just start putting money into his own accounts. He is doing that anyway, but at least not by having the fiat currency handed to him.

So there is an argument for the independence of the Fed. But that argument fails without transparency and accountability. This is why people like Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders have been right on the money (so to speak) when they demand the Fed must operate transparently, including passing regular public audits.

This ought to be the minimum requirement for having an independent organization control the money. But as I have mentioned above, the Fed no longer controls the money supply in a meaningful way. The cryptocurrencies are, de facto, part of our money supply. And the insane bubble stocks are behaving, more than any time in our history, like currency. The mag-7 stocks have $23 TRILLION of stock in circulation, compared to only $2.4 trillion of US currency in circulation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge Amy Berman Jackson ...