Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(26,998 posts)
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 03:11 PM Monday

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dire warning comes true: study

By Alexander Willis
Published January 5, 2026 1:52 PM ET

Liberal Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned last summer that her conservative colleagues on the bench were doing irreparable harm to the court’s image as they increasingly sided with the rich and powerful, and a new study published Monday appeared to validate those fears.

Published by the National Bureau of Economic Research, the study found that since the 1950s, conservative Supreme Court justices increasingly issued rulings that favored the wealthy when compared to their liberal counterparts.

Researchers analyzed 1,782 Supreme Court cases and classified justices’ votes as either “pro-rich” – which they defined as a vote that produced an “outcome [that] would directly shift resources to the party that is more likely to be wealthy” – or “pro-poor.” Researchers found that conservative justices cast “pro-rich” votes 70% of the time by the end of 2022, a stark contrast to liberal justices’ 35% during the same time period.

https://www.rawstory.com/supreme-court-2674849387/

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dire warning comes true: study (Original Post) turbinetree Monday OP
This one simple trick can fix all that: Fiendish Thingy Monday #1
This................ turbinetree Monday #2
Along with .... lastlib Monday #3
This............. turbinetree Monday #7
No. It doesn't fix it as it can be increased then by the Republicans and we'd have unending escalation. cstanleytech Monday #5
Amendments are more difficult than laws, and we must never again fail to act due to fear of what republicans might do. Fiendish Thingy Monday #6
Presidential Administrations have been different Parties four times in a row now Polybius Monday #8
As they say in the investment world: Fiendish Thingy Monday #10
I am supporting Gavin, who I think can serve two terms Polybius Monday #11
You've decided who the best candidate is before the campaign has begun? Fiendish Thingy Monday #12
I am open to changing my mind Polybius Tuesday #15
Charisma indeed sells Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #16
Yes, they are more difficult but it's actually the only real way to reduce this type of bullshit being forced on us. cstanleytech Tuesday #14
One problem with this idea: Repugs own the Senate and the White House JustABozoOnThisBus Tuesday #17
Of course I was speaking of 2029 Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #18
Ok, but if it's so easy, I'm surprised the Repugs don't jump on it today. JustABozoOnThisBus Tuesday #19
Not to forget... BurnDoubt Monday #4
Our nation and our Democracy is a sham kwolf68 Monday #9
Sadly I think things are already "pretty bad" Dave says Monday #13

Fiendish Thingy

(22,091 posts)
1. This one simple trick can fix all that:
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 03:27 PM
Monday

Kill the filibuster and expand the court, neutralizing the MAGA majority.

Should be a litmus test for all Dem senate candidates

cstanleytech

(28,234 posts)
5. No. It doesn't fix it as it can be increased then by the Republicans and we'd have unending escalation.
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 06:22 PM
Monday

What is needed is a new Amendment that charges the way Judges become a SCOTUS judge. My preferred method would be that they are randomly picked from the Federal judges already on the bench and they serve a single nine year term and after that they are automatically retired.
They also can never be nominated or appointed to be a judge on any Federal court after that.
Also, if they decline the SCOTUS selection they are automatically retired and cannot ever be nominated or appointed to any Federal court.
It would make it much harder then for the wealthy to gain control over the Court in the future like they have currently managed to do right now as the choice of a new SCOTUS judges would be completely random.

Fiendish Thingy

(22,091 posts)
6. Amendments are more difficult than laws, and we must never again fail to act due to fear of what republicans might do.
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 06:51 PM
Monday

If the court is expanded and Democrats govern fearlessly, without hesitation, it will be a generation or more before republicans again have a trifecta (see FDR and the New Deal).

Polybius

(21,528 posts)
8. Presidential Administrations have been different Parties four times in a row now
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 09:14 PM
Monday
2012: Democratic
2016: Republican
2020: Democratic
2024: Republican


2028 will presumably go to a Democrat, making it an unprecedented five times. I don't see any Party holding it for more than two terms anymore.

Fiendish Thingy

(22,091 posts)
10. As they say in the investment world:
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 09:20 PM
Monday

“Past performance is no guarantee of future returns”

I agree, if we get timid centrist governance in 2029, Dems aren’t likely to hold onto power for long.

It has been 80+ years since Dems had a trifecta and governed progressively without fear or hesitation (LBJ came close, but…Viet Nam, and Biden tried but was sabotaged).

If Dems expand the court and govern fearlessly in 2029, the voters will reward them for a generation.

Polybius

(21,528 posts)
11. I am supporting Gavin, who I think can serve two terms
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 09:24 PM
Monday

But even if he's very popular, there's no guarantee that another Democrat carries the torch in 2036. Obama was popular, Bill Clinton more so. Still produced a Republican in 2000 and 2016.

One reason I detest the 22nd. It's pretty much only hurt us.

Polybius

(21,528 posts)
15. I am open to changing my mind
Tue Jan 6, 2026, 05:21 AM
Tuesday

But I'm a huge fan of him and his appeal. I just can't think of anyone better at the moment. Charisma sells.

cstanleytech

(28,234 posts)
14. Yes, they are more difficult but it's actually the only real way to reduce this type of bullshit being forced on us.
Tue Jan 6, 2026, 01:46 AM
Tuesday

Believe me, I wish we had a liberal majority on SCOTUS but even if we passed a law to increase the number positions on SCOTUS and packed with with liberal judges the Republicans would just increase it more later on.
So, no I can't get behind increasing the.number of SCOTUS judges as it's a recipe that will lead to unending chain of resentment and anger.
An Amendment though SCOTUS Judges automatically out while randomly picking a Federal Judge that's already been confirmed to their current position would work out a lot better in the long run than any law to increase the number of judges ever could.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(24,599 posts)
17. One problem with this idea: Repugs own the Senate and the White House
Tue Jan 6, 2026, 02:08 PM
Tuesday

And the U.S. Extreme Court.

Do you want to expand the court in this environment? Instead of Trump's 6-3 majority, it'll be 10-3. (with Justice Cannon in the mix)

JustABozoOnThisBus

(24,599 posts)
19. Ok, but if it's so easy, I'm surprised the Repugs don't jump on it today.
Tue Jan 6, 2026, 03:28 PM
Tuesday

Increase their majority, and maybe slam the door on Dems for the foreseeable future

BurnDoubt

(1,490 posts)
4. Not to forget...
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 06:16 PM
Monday

Two BOGUS appointments and one with a hinky past and a taste for the grog, and two quite obviously for sale.
Not even Justice adjacent.
The Heritage Foundation... Terrorism in Geologic Time.
Everything he touches turns to Shit...
Ergo... Shithole Country.

KBJ... You are the light of the Future. Make ' em Cry.

kwolf68

(8,262 posts)
9. Our nation and our Democracy is a sham
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 09:18 PM
Monday

On issue after issue, a majority side with the Liberal position. Yet, the SCOTUS is 67% far right wing. We have states with more cows than people than have as much power as states with more people than many nations and would rank among the top 20 in world wide GDP.

Sadly, the only thing that will make change is for shit to get really bad and then many will wake up and go, "damn, those libtards were right afterall". Sadly, by then it won't matter.

Dave says

(5,331 posts)
13. Sadly I think things are already "pretty bad"
Mon Jan 5, 2026, 10:01 PM
Monday

Although I acknowledge they can (and seemingly will) get much worse.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court Justice Ket...