General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking: "Justice Department's watchdog is reviewing compliance with the law mandating Epstein files release"
The review from the inspector generals office will focus on how the department collected, reviewed and redacted materials in preparation for release and its process for addressing privacy concerns that arose after the files were made public, when Epstein survivors complained that personal information about them was disclosed.
The audit will focus on one of the more politically sensitive chapters of the Trump administrations Justice Department, when officials bowed to public pressure and to a law from Congress to release millions of pages of records that the executive branch had initially said would not come out. It marks the first significant effort by the watchdog since Trump took office for a second time to scrutinize the actions of a department that has been riven by tumult, including mass firings of employees and allegations of politicization of investigations.
/SNIP
The departments subsequent release of records generated complaints from victims, who said sloppy redactions had left their identities exposed, and to criticism that information that could have been damaging to Trump was withheld from disclosure.
By ERIC TUCKER
Updated 12:50 PM EDT, April 23, 2026
The story just broke. The article is not much longer than this excerpt. Here is the link.
https://apnews.com/article/epstein-files-justice-department-release-watchdog-bd1f97448163f69311917e768a5d2a9f
RockRaven
(19,586 posts)unless you want to find yourself avoidably disappointed.
yellow dahlia
(6,206 posts)I am trying to find out more about this guy - Don Berthiaume. He is a career government lawyer.
It seems that yesterday the grifter said he is nominating him for the position permanently - Senate confirmation will be required. Interesting. Does that mean he has shown he will play the game? Probably.
I read an article that said whistleblowers at DOJ are not getting response from the Inspector General's office. Of course!
wcmagumba
(6,443 posts)This is because Trump's name is in the Epstein files hundreds of times because it was a service he used and reveled in...
Trump really is and was a sick f**k...
Whip-poor-will
(358 posts)A trumper coworker assured me ,just this morning, that they are false accusations on an an ominous tip hot line not real
Ocelot II
(130,892 posts)
MustLoveBeagles
(16,906 posts)That's cute
yellow dahlia
(6,206 posts)But, Rock Raven pointed out earlier - he is not likely to do the job required.
Whip-poor-will
(358 posts)Haven't seen the CDs and tapes seized seven years ago so...what's up with that ?
Dan
(5,249 posts)This administration and DOJ believes in the application of the law for us, not them.
yellow dahlia
(6,206 posts)usonian
(26,009 posts)Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. That linewritten by Frank Wilhoithas become a popular aphorism to sum up the hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of the modern Republican Party.
https://pylimitics.net/wilhoits-law/
yellow dahlia
(6,206 posts)usonian
(26,009 posts)Figures.
yellow dahlia
(6,206 posts)Kid Berwyn
(24,749 posts)Expecting the usual worst. And when it comes to Epstein, its been a multi-presidential cover-up going back to when Adnan Khashoggi was servicing Ollie North and Pruneface Rayguns illegal war on Nicaragua.
Thank you for the heads-up, yellow dahlia. Worst case, no problem: We the People will gather more evidence for when Justice returns.
yellow dahlia
(6,206 posts)The cover up evidence pile may get bigger if the IG furthers the cover up. The seekers of Justice are going to be busy for decades to come.
malaise
(297,012 posts)K & R