Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHegseth, Xi, Stalin
Today on TAP: Paranoid purges of generals and admirals are common to dictators and tin-pot wannabes.
https://prospect.org/2026/04/23/hegseth-xi-stalin-paranoid-purges-military/

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth earlier this month. Credit: Kevin Wolf/AP Photo
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseths firing yesterday of Navy Secretary John Phelan would normally be bound for the world will little note nor long remember file, but for its ironies and its context. As for ironies, Phelan was a perfectly typical Trump appointee: a Florida-based investor whom President Trump had hailed as one of the most successful businessmen in the country. Phelan even was aligned with Trumps nostalgic desire to have the Navy build more battleshipspower symbols of Trumps youtheven though naval officials and scholars universally believe that theyve been obsolete since 1942. But even all this was not enough to make Phelan the kind of Hegseth acolyte who can enjoy job security (at least until the criteria for Hegseth acolyte change, as they do every few weeks).
But its the context in which the firing occurred that makes it part of a broader and more important story. That context is the purge of top commanders that weve seen under Trump and Hegseth: the firing of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, the Navys chief of staff, and the commandant of the Coast Guard, who violated Trump and Hegseths norms of propriety by being, respectively, Black, female, and female. Those discharges preceded the firing of the Air Force chief of staff and, earlier this month, Army Chief of Staff Randy George, even as our war on Iran was raging. According to a Wall Street Journal report, George was upset that Hegseth had struck Black and female colonels from the Armys list of candidates about to be promoted to generals, and George was also close to Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, whom Hegseth views as a rival.
The Hegseth purge, which also has cost the jobs of leaders of intelligence agencies, legal advisers, and sundry other chiefs of staff, exemplifies the normal staffing criteria of the Trump administration. It assumes that any officials who are not both white and male are only in their jobs due to some dastardly DEI machinations, and, fundamentally, just dont look the part. (See, e.g., battleship nostalgia, above.) It assumes that any officials who stand up for their nonwhite, non-male colleagues are woke themselves, which is reason enough to get the axe. It makes support for Trump and his whims (whims being the real meaning of policy in this administration) the sine qua non of the ability to continue to hold an administration job, and the same goes for support for Trumps appointed department heads (e.g., Hegseth). It is suffused with paranoia about real or potential or imagined rivals. And it dismissesindeed, disdainsknowledge of the officials area of responsibility and the empirical facts therein as grounds either for being hired (see, e.g., Hegseth again) or for staying on the federal payroll. One of the worlds greatest universities could be assembled from the ranks of the scientists whom Trump and his underlings have canned.
Theres one more context in which Hegseths purges comfortably fit. Hes hardly the first leader to have purged military chiefs for non-military reasonschiefly, for a deficiency (either real or imagined) of loyalty to him even when facts compel those military chiefs to dispute the leaders judgment. In this, Hegseth is following the example of Chinas President Xi, who has arrested, fired, or disappeared 29 of Chinas 44 top generals and admirals since 2023. Even Xis paranoia pales alongside that of Stalin, who notoriously purged roughly 80 percent of his armys generals and thousands of colonels and other officers in 1937 and 1938, in many cases executing them. The purge, which coincided with the show trials of virtually every Communist leader who wasnt entirely a creature of Stalins every impulse, goes a long way to explaining why the Soviet army was repeatedly repulsed by the Finnish army in 1940 when the USSR invaded Finland, and why Stalin wasnt at all prepared when Hitler invaded Russia in 1941.
snip
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hegseth, Xi, Stalin (Original Post)
Celerity
11 hrs ago
OP
Goonch
(5,343 posts)1. ;-{)......

