Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaddowBlog-Conservative appeals court backs Ten Commandments in classrooms, ignoring precedent
Politicians have repeatedly lost in court when trying to impose religious texts on children. The nations most far-right appeals court apparently didnt care.
Link to tweet
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/conservative-appeals-court-backs-ten-commandments-in-classrooms-ignoring-precedent
Around the same time, the GOPs crusade advanced undeterred in Texas, where Gov. Greg Abbott signed a measure that required every public school classroom in the state to display the Ten Commandments. The law mandated that the religious display had to be in a conspicuous location, with text that could be seen from anywhere in the room.
Five months later, the law was partially blocked by a federal district court. This week, proponents of government-sponsored religion fared far better with a federal appeals court. The New York Times reported:
The Fifth Circuit is known as the nations most far-right appeals court, and it solidified its reputation in this case: The Republican-appointed judges majority ruling suggested the First Amendment was really only designed to prevent official recognition of the Church of England, which is ahistorical nonsense contradicted by everything we know about American history, the Constitution and its formation.....
The legal dimension to this is every bit as jarring. Indeed, when officials in Kentucky approved a similar law nearly a half-century ago, the Supreme Court ruled in 1980 that Ten Commandments displays in public schools were unconstitutional.
The Decalogue, the justices ruled in Stone v. Graham, is undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths and displaying them serves no educational function.
So why did Texas Republicans take a step the Supreme Court has already rejected? Probably because theyre confident the newly politicized high court and its dominant far-right majority will simply overturn the Stone precedent, doing fresh harm to the wall thats supposed to separate church and state in this country.
Well likely find out soon whether their assumption is correct. Watch this space.
Five months later, the law was partially blocked by a federal district court. This week, proponents of government-sponsored religion fared far better with a federal appeals court. The New York Times reported:
A federal appeals court on Tuesday narrowly upheld a Texas law that requires public schools to display posters of the Ten Commandments in classrooms.
By 9-to-8, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the law does not violate the separation of church and state, reversing two lower court decisions. The court also ruled the measure does not restrict parents right to direct their childrens religious upbringing.
The Fifth Circuit is known as the nations most far-right appeals court, and it solidified its reputation in this case: The Republican-appointed judges majority ruling suggested the First Amendment was really only designed to prevent official recognition of the Church of England, which is ahistorical nonsense contradicted by everything we know about American history, the Constitution and its formation.....
The legal dimension to this is every bit as jarring. Indeed, when officials in Kentucky approved a similar law nearly a half-century ago, the Supreme Court ruled in 1980 that Ten Commandments displays in public schools were unconstitutional.
The Decalogue, the justices ruled in Stone v. Graham, is undeniably a sacred text in the Jewish and Christian faiths and displaying them serves no educational function.
So why did Texas Republicans take a step the Supreme Court has already rejected? Probably because theyre confident the newly politicized high court and its dominant far-right majority will simply overturn the Stone precedent, doing fresh harm to the wall thats supposed to separate church and state in this country.
Well likely find out soon whether their assumption is correct. Watch this space.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MaddowBlog-Conservative appeals court backs Ten Commandments in classrooms, ignoring precedent (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Thursday
OP
Court:"this is not historical religious establishment". Paxton:" this is the historical religious establishment we want"
muriel_volestrangler
Thursday
#4
Norrrm
(5,334 posts)1. Beside it should be a list of commandments Trump has NOT broken.
AZJonnie
(3,854 posts)2. Well THIS is some freaking BULLSHIT
I'm so glad I just found out *today* that I can get myself dual USA/Canadian citizenship thanks to a recently-made-more-liberal laws regarding lineage (as of Dec. 2025). The US Constitution now means basically nothing other than GUNZ and MOAR GUNZ!
B.See
(8,642 posts)3. aka. The MAGA KKangaroo Kourt of the Fifth Strikes Again.
When it comes to DOING THE WRONG THING, those racist backward-arsed bstrds can ALWAYS be counted on.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,415 posts)4. Court:"this is not historical religious establishment". Paxton:" this is the historical religious establishment we want"
"S.B. 10 looks nothing like a historical religious establishment," Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan, a President Donald Trump nominee, wrote for the nine-judge majority. "It does not tell churches or synagogues or mosques what to believe or how to worship or whom to employ as priests, rabbis, or imams. It punishes no one who rejects the Ten Commandments, no matter the reason."
...
"My office was proud to defend SB 10 and successfully ensure that the Ten Commandments will be displayed in classrooms across Texas," Paxton said. "The Ten Commandments have had a profound impact on our nation, and it's important that students learn from them every single day."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/federal-appeals-court-allows-ten-commandments-displays-in-texas-classrooms-heres-what-to-know/ar-AA21roqs
...
"My office was proud to defend SB 10 and successfully ensure that the Ten Commandments will be displayed in classrooms across Texas," Paxton said. "The Ten Commandments have had a profound impact on our nation, and it's important that students learn from them every single day."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/federal-appeals-court-allows-ten-commandments-displays-in-texas-classrooms-heres-what-to-know/ar-AA21roqs
"It does not tell churches or synagogues or mosques what to believe or how to worship" - well, it tells impressionable children what to believe and how to worship, literally. And that's why Paxton has welcomed this idiotic decision with "it's important that students learn from them every single day". It "looks nothing like a historical religious establishment"; Paxton counters with "The Ten Commandments have had a profound impact on our nation", ie "this is how we used to establish one religion in this nation".