General Discussion

highplainsdem

(62,783 posts) Tue Apr 28, 2026, 10:13 PM Tuesday

Mueller, She Wrote: Can they really not find the bullet, or are they hiding it because they don't want to admit it was

friendly fire?

Can they really not find the bullet, or are they hiding it because they donâ€™t want to admit it was friendly fire?
— Mueller, She Wrote (@muellershewrote.com) 2026-04-29T01:37:22.205Z

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mueller, She Wrote: Can they really not find the bullet, or are they hiding it because they don't want to admit it was (Original Post) highplainsdem Tuesday OP

Honey, wake up, a new Magic Bullet Theory just dropped... RockRaven Tuesday #1

I thought they claimed the assailant fired a shotgun. Shotgun pellets from the latter are obviously hlthe2b Tuesday #2

The most convincing theory of the Kennedy assassination CanonRay Tuesday #3

My understanding was the suspect fired buckshot MerryBlooms Tuesday #4

If they have a choice... lame54 Tuesday #5

RockRaven

(19,648 posts)

1. Honey, wake up, a new Magic Bullet Theory just dropped...

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Tue Apr 28, 2026, 10:19 PM

Tuesday

hlthe2b

(114,376 posts)

2. I thought they claimed the assailant fired a shotgun. Shotgun pellets from the latter are obviously

Reply to highplainsdem (Original post)

Tue Apr 28, 2026, 10:28 PM

Tuesday

going to be quite different from a single bullet hitting a Kevlar protective vest. That should be obvious simply based on visual inspection. So, if my understanding is correct, then they are covering up that the assailant did not hit the agent and it would have to be friendly fire. I get that the latter part of the investigation would be time consuming, but excluding the assailant would probably be in evidence already.

If I heard incorrectly, then I stand corrected. But, this is what I understood to be the current status.