General Discussion

In It to Win It

(12,777 posts) Thu May 7, 2026, 01:55 PM Thursday

NEW: 113 Republican members of Congress asked the Supreme Court to end telehealth prescriptions of mifepristone

Susan Rinkunas
‪@susanrinkunas.com‬

NEW: 113 Republican members of Congress asked the Supreme Court to end telehealth prescriptions of the abortion drug mifepristone. They say the FDA rule change was improper *and* that it violates the federal Comstock Act
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25/25A1207/408275/20260507122624693_25A1207%20and%2025A1208_Amicus%20Brief.pdf

NEW: 113 Republican members of Congress asked the Supreme Court to end telehealth prescriptions of the abortion drug mifepristone. They say the FDA rule change was improper *and* that it violates the federal Comstock Act
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...
— Susan Rinkunas (@susanrinkunas.com) 2026-05-07T17:11:01.062Z

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NEW: 113 Republican members of Congress asked the Supreme Court to end telehealth prescriptions of mifepristone (Original Post) In It to Win It Thursday OP

I hope those 113 are attacked with ads saying they are taking away women's rights when they run for re-election kimbutgar Thursday #1

Dem caucus should a write a letter just to provw there are more in congress opposed to this idea than who support it SSJVegeta Thursday #2

Mr. chief justice what were you saying about politicizing the court? Walleye Thursday #3

EFFING EFFERS Faux pas Thursday #4

Supposed Free Market Republicons using government to coerce, control, and condemn bucolic_frolic Thursday #5

This is why we need Blue State JustAnotherGen Thursday #6

That means 322 didn't. sinkingfeeling Thursday #7

So they can retain gop dollars and keep evangelical voters and believe lindysalsagal Thursday #8

Congressional Republicans Want Women to Suffer. sakabatou Thursday #9

kimbutgar

(27,501 posts)

1. I hope those 113 are attacked with ads saying they are taking away women's rights when they run for re-election

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Thu May 7, 2026, 01:58 PM

Thursday

SSJVegeta

(3,026 posts)

2. Dem caucus should a write a letter just to provw there are more in congress opposed to this idea than who support it

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Thu May 7, 2026, 02:01 PM

Thursday

Walleye

(45,319 posts)

3. Mr. chief justice what were you saying about politicizing the court?

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Thu May 7, 2026, 02:05 PM

Thursday

Faux pas

(16,511 posts)

4. EFFING EFFERS

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Thu May 7, 2026, 02:07 PM

Thursday

bucolic_frolic

(55,690 posts)

5. Supposed Free Market Republicons using government to coerce, control, and condemn

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Thu May 7, 2026, 02:20 PM

Thursday

Theirs is such a hateful agenda!

JustAnotherGen

(38,105 posts)

6. This is why we need Blue State

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Thu May 7, 2026, 03:24 PM

Thursday

Consortiums. NJ could really lead here - as we have the knowledge, science, talent, and most important - means of production to trigger one of the Big Pharma headquartered here to go behind America's back.