Who wore a Nazi uniform to a party.
It seems he has grown up

I don't think he should have chosen that as his costume, but if I wore a hooker costume to a masquerade, it wouldn't mean that I was a prostitute. A lot of people dress as the Devil for Halloween. And so on.

He was reamed by him family and the public.

His military service to his country was in a hostile combat zone, where there was a literal price on his head. He has made his apologies many times over.

And that was just a couple years ago

I'm giving Harry a pass on growing up/maturing.

and I think his service years profoundly affected him.

and toss out that gang of parasites! I wonder if the tourist income generated by royalty gawkers is enough to pay for their continued upkeep.

if he called for the destruction of Israel?

His personal interests are the environment and historical preservation, but he is very liberal.

has the monarchy recently had on the rest of the government? Of course, there are other considerations. Indeed, what would the toxic tabloid press and the gaggles of "royal experts", "royal insiders", "royal observers" and other gossip mongers do without them?

things like policies are the job of the elected and other govt officials .

and cultural figurehead thing. Not sure why people get so angry over them.

are the surviving vestiges of a feudal system that separated humans into lords and serfs, a demeaning system that promoted vast differences in wealth and social status that have persisted to this day. The myth of "royal blood" was never and is still not a harmless concept. The fact that some monarchies no longer have actual power may show some progress toward true equality of human rights, but it is certainly not a reason to keep them around. We, as a species, are far better off without them. The persistent curse of alpha male leadership, under which we Americans presently suffer, has been in large part kept alive by monarchies over the centuries.

tv and social media culture .

as are the Tech Bros who accompanied him to China. England fostered the Divine Right of Kings, contributing to the preservation of the ancient belief that rulers were gods or chosen by them. Many in this country have been surprised at the evangelicals' comparisons of Trump to Jesus. No surprise to me at all. And see how Trump has been playing into it himself...

and especially not the UK Monarchy as it exists today.

This is just looking for something to feel outraged over when it's actually just meaningless.

and 117 under a king. It's not really about "alpha male leadership". The voting laws of all countries were far more misogynistic, and to blame for "alpha males".

Good luck!

This has nothing to do with antisemitism.

You may have heard of Calvinism. One of its tenets (the idea that economic success is a visible sign of God's grace) still lives and flourishes in today's religious world. If you follow history, you can follow the thread that connects today's "noble rich" with the kings, queens, lords and ladies of the past. It has everything to do with it.

(a logical fallacy where the conclusion reached has no logical or direct connection to the premise...)

The connection between the old monarchies and the new ones is real. When humans no longer need them for any reason, given the negativity associated with their histories, then we will have turned a corner as a species. Today's UK royals now are in an ideal (for them) situation...obscenely wealthy with few responsibilities beyond ribbon-cutting and some do-gooding.

rather than editorial and bumper stickers are used. Otherwise, they're simply assertions. Good luck!

to get through this mess too many Americans voted for. There are reasons the mass protests are called "No Kings".

Good luck!

What does that have to do antisemitism?

Frankly, I would guess more than a few British people would scoff at him using the title and trying to meddle in policies all the sudden. Saw recently that he wants security protection like the royals who do their assigned 'duties'. Maybe it's rougher out there among common people? He and the wife want back in?

I like Harry, and am glad he got the counseling he needed, did the work to get over some traumas, but he seems to be having second thoughts about his decision to live his life his way, outside of the privileged umbrella of monarchy.

My post was "can't have cake and eat it too".

Harry is way too full of himself

direct responses to the OP address the antisemitism but the rest go on various tangents.

I hate to speculate but it seems as if people don't want to talk about antisemitism, that they would prefer to ignore it.

What we need in this forum is more discussions that go off on tangents and last for days on end.

Why not post an OP on what you want to discuss instead of hijacking conversations?

and people are still exchanging views on Harry, royals making statements, royals, and the monarchy. The OP started something interesting and we're goin' with the flow. Daz-zit...

"people are still exchanging views on Harry, royals making statements, royals, and the monarchy."

The topic of the OP is being talked over, any discussion of antisemitism is muted if not silenced.

Mission accomplished.

and Harry is rightly concerned about its spread, as Brits of any class and station should be. I'm happy to help steer the conversation back to its proper channel.

Yup. Bring up anti-Semitism...shift to everything else but, especially if you can move the conversation to Israel or Islamophobia. Can you image every time there was a discussion about an anti-Black racist attack and posters decried, "But what about....?!" Of course, it does happen on occasion.

At least we know Harry isn't taking money from AIPAC.

If you just read the headlines or the brief summaries on many websites you’d think he’s parroting Randy Fine when the reality is quite the opposite.

I just find it strange that certain aspects aren’t getting the headline coverage.