Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAftermath: The Trump Who Cried Iran Deal by David Dayen

Are We Still at War?
Hahahaha.
At some point, everyone involved with the Iran war debacle, from political figures to Wall Street investors to the news media, will resolve to stop lunging at every Trumpian pronouncement of a deal to end the war. Even the best possible reading of the latest announcement cannot credibly be described as a deal at all, but rather, agreements to begin talks to reach a deal. The only specific outcome that would result is the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, which was open before the war began. It would not deal with the status of highly enriched uranium. It would not deal with Irans nuclear program. It would not deal with that nations missile production or capacity. Its nothing, even in the best-case scenario, but a reset to the negotiations that were under way before the war began.
But were not in the best-case scenario, because that assumes that the non-deal deal is actually happening. Which it is not. Since this past weekends announcement by President Trump, we have seen Iran dispute really all of the terms of the deal and the U.S. admit that an actual agreement could take some timewhich is what you say when nothing is agreed to. We have seen actual airstrikes on missile launch sites in southern Iran, which were described as defensive and which Iran has justifiably characterized as flagrant violations of the cease-fire agreement, while vowing to retaliate. (We havent seen that transpire yet, though there has been exchange of fire.)
"The core belief of the Trump administration in this and all things is that they can bully their opponent into submission."
When you are in a negotiation, and your negotiating partner violates the terms of the negotiations, you begin to get highly suspicious that any agreement you make will actually be adhered to. That is the position Iran finds itself in, and why were going to be in this endless loop of announcing an agreement to begin talks toward an agreement to end the war approximately indefinitely. Welcome to Groundhog Day.
Meanwhile, while everyone talks, correctly, about Iranian hard-liners at odds with their nations negotiating posture, Trump has had to attend to his own hard-liners who dont want peace, here and in Israel, by making a rushed demand for every Arab country to formally recognize Israel, terming that a complement to a final deal. And Israel has been working assiduously to sabotage any agreement by bombing and even ordering evacuations in Lebanon, even as Iran is demanding an end to that conflict as one of the terms of the deal.
Hahahaha.
At some point, everyone involved with the Iran war debacle, from political figures to Wall Street investors to the news media, will resolve to stop lunging at every Trumpian pronouncement of a deal to end the war. Even the best possible reading of the latest announcement cannot credibly be described as a deal at all, but rather, agreements to begin talks to reach a deal. The only specific outcome that would result is the opening of the Strait of Hormuz, which was open before the war began. It would not deal with the status of highly enriched uranium. It would not deal with Irans nuclear program. It would not deal with that nations missile production or capacity. Its nothing, even in the best-case scenario, but a reset to the negotiations that were under way before the war began.
But were not in the best-case scenario, because that assumes that the non-deal deal is actually happening. Which it is not. Since this past weekends announcement by President Trump, we have seen Iran dispute really all of the terms of the deal and the U.S. admit that an actual agreement could take some timewhich is what you say when nothing is agreed to. We have seen actual airstrikes on missile launch sites in southern Iran, which were described as defensive and which Iran has justifiably characterized as flagrant violations of the cease-fire agreement, while vowing to retaliate. (We havent seen that transpire yet, though there has been exchange of fire.)
"The core belief of the Trump administration in this and all things is that they can bully their opponent into submission."
When you are in a negotiation, and your negotiating partner violates the terms of the negotiations, you begin to get highly suspicious that any agreement you make will actually be adhered to. That is the position Iran finds itself in, and why were going to be in this endless loop of announcing an agreement to begin talks toward an agreement to end the war approximately indefinitely. Welcome to Groundhog Day.
Meanwhile, while everyone talks, correctly, about Iranian hard-liners at odds with their nations negotiating posture, Trump has had to attend to his own hard-liners who dont want peace, here and in Israel, by making a rushed demand for every Arab country to formally recognize Israel, terming that a complement to a final deal. And Israel has been working assiduously to sabotage any agreement by bombing and even ordering evacuations in Lebanon, even as Iran is demanding an end to that conflict as one of the terms of the deal.
https://prospect.org/2026/05/28/aftermath-trump-who-cried-iran-deal/
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Aftermath: The Trump Who Cried Iran Deal by David Dayen (Original Post)
justaprogressive
Thursday
OP
Johonny
(26,686 posts)1. It feels like until the market makes Trump
Understand the true cost of not making a deal, he will sit around doing nothing. He is a wimp at heart and unable to commit or form strategy. Iran is winning and will win because he's weak and they know it.