Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(24,838 posts)
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 05:38 PM Jun 3

HAT TRICK! No SLUSH fund, no $1 billion for the ballroom, & "House passes Iran war powers resolution in rebuke to Trump"

House passes Iran war powers resolution in rebuke to Trump

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/03/politics/house-iran-war-powers-vote

The House passed a resolution on Wednesday to limit President Donald Trump’s war powers in Iran, a significant rebuke to Trump and his handling of the conflict.

Democrats have repeatedly forced votes to limit Trump’s war powers in both the House and the Senate – a campaign that has gradually picked up more GOP support in recent weeks.

The measure, known as a concurrent resolution, passed by the House Wednesday must be approved by both chambers, but would not go to the president to be signed.

The vote was 215 to 208 with Republican Reps. Thomas Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick, Tom Barrett and Warren Davidson crossing party lines to support the resolution.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HAT TRICK! No SLUSH fund, no $1 billion for the ballroom, & "House passes Iran war powers resolution in rebuke to Trump" (Original Post) Miles Archer Jun 3 OP
Nice UpInArms Jun 3 #1
K & R for visibility malaise Jun 3 #2
Wonderful. Its about time. Srkdqltr Jun 3 #3
I'm thinking they are getting less afraid of him. BlueKota Jun 3 #4
Sharks are aware of that first drop of blood in the water. Miles Archer Jun 3 #6
I agree! BlueKota Jun 3 #7
I think a large part of it ITAL Jun 3 #9
They're going to have to move FAR back to the CENTER to get elected, and I don't think they have it in them Miles Archer Jun 3 #10
I'm not talking about the ones who may run for president ITAL Jun 3 #12
Well, they've also witnessed Trump's treatment of Congress members who fail to give 100% fealty 100% of the time. Miles Archer Jun 3 #13
And my point was ITAL Jun 3 #15
I am having similar thoughts. wnylib Jun 3 #8
I think they are becoming more afraid of their VOTERS... 70sEraVet Jun 3 #16
We just need to get that slush fund thing in writing. senseandsensibility Jun 3 #5
Suddenly they y are turning. Is this why? Kablooie Jun 3 #11
Hopefully Katcat Jun 3 #14
Now on to removing the ridiculous "forever immunity for himself, his family, and his businesses." Sogo Jun 3 #17
Triple Loser. Sneederbunk Jun 3 #18
MaddowBlog-Senate Republicans ignore Trump's pleas, strip ballroom funding from key bill LetMyPeopleVote Jun 4 #19
r&k those that love hockey, got the reference MerryBlooms Jun 4 #20
MaddowBlog-Trump's legislative losing streak continues, as his grip on Congress weakens LetMyPeopleVote Jun 7 #21

BlueKota

(5,597 posts)
4. I'm thinking they are getting less afraid of him.
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 06:09 PM
Jun 3

It could be coincidence or just wishful thinking. I am beginning to wonder though, as more and more evidence about tsf's further medical deterioration are surfacing, whether at least some House and Senate Republicons are thinking they don't have to dance to his tune anymore.

Miles Archer

(24,838 posts)
6. Sharks are aware of that first drop of blood in the water.
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 06:23 PM
Jun 3

I think the question is that if Trump looked and behaved as he did in his first term...still abhorrent, an abomination, but NOT in an alarming state of physical and mental decay, and NOT falling asleep in every meeting, would they be doing this?

I think not.

Because no matter WHO triies to take the rains after his dirt nap, he'll never have the iron grip on him that he still has, and they know it.

ITAL

(1,438 posts)
9. I think a large part of it
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 07:34 PM
Jun 3

Is a lot of the primaries are over (not all states, but many). They're not quite as scared of him now that he won't get someone to primary and challenge them. And after November, at least a few will start looking at '28 and a post Trump GOP.

Miles Archer

(24,838 posts)
10. They're going to have to move FAR back to the CENTER to get elected, and I don't think they have it in them
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 07:45 PM
Jun 3

Look at who's being suggested. Don Jr WANTS IT, but Grampy says he'd rather have PRINCESS IVANKA.

I don't see Trump endorsing Vance or Rubio. He wants the Princess.

Then, there's Tucker Carlson. TUCKER CARLSON, being held up as a potential nominee.

I think what they would like to "SELL" is a return to "REAGAN REPUBLICANS."

Obviously, that won't win over any Democrats, and probably not a majority of Independents. But it would be their way of attempting to wash the stink of the "Trump Decade-Plus" off of them. And if they DO prop up a total knob like Don Jr, well...good luck to them, I guess. They'll need it.

ITAL

(1,438 posts)
12. I'm not talking about the ones who may run for president
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 07:52 PM
Jun 3

I was more meaning folks in Congress since the post I was responding to was about more Republicans crossing the aisle to vote against stuff he wanted. Now that we're largely through primaries, it's started to happen in drips. I feel like once we get into '27 (barring a total red wave catastrophe) that is more likely to happen as they lose the House, and hopefully the Senate. There are a lot of true believers no doubt, but most in Congress just want to be re-elected. Trump's power will probably slowly start to fade as folks look to their '28 re-elections without Trump on the ballot. He may sink some in a primary if they go against him too much I suppose given he loves revenge, but I feel like he will likely check out by early '28. His last year might be on total cruise control.

Miles Archer

(24,838 posts)
13. Well, they've also witnessed Trump's treatment of Congress members who fail to give 100% fealty 100% of the time.
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 07:56 PM
Jun 3

I'm smart enough to know that if I am in a group of people that's getting picked off one at a time, I could be next, especially if I'm behaving the way they're behaving.

A Republican doesn't have to "like" Massie or Cornyn.

They just need to see what Trump's doing to them and understand they could be next.

ITAL

(1,438 posts)
15. And my point was
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 08:00 PM
Jun 3

Primary season is largely over, so he can't hang that sword over many of them now (soon to be all). And by the next time he can in '28, he many not care.

70sEraVet

(5,735 posts)
16. I think they are becoming more afraid of their VOTERS...
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 08:07 PM
Jun 3

than they are of him!
The threats of being 'primaried' by an angry trump don't carry much weight, if the tea leaves reveal that Democrats are going to be elected!

Kablooie

(19,134 posts)
11. Suddenly they y are turning. Is this why?
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 07:51 PM
Jun 3

Do they know something we don’t know?
Maybe the rumors of Trump having a stroke are true.
If Trump is gone all his vanity projects will turn to dust.

Sogo

(7,361 posts)
17. Now on to removing the ridiculous "forever immunity for himself, his family, and his businesses."
Wed Jun 3, 2026, 08:21 PM
Jun 3

nt.

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,910 posts)
19. MaddowBlog-Senate Republicans ignore Trump's pleas, strip ballroom funding from key bill
Thu Jun 4, 2026, 08:28 PM
Jun 4

The president said the White House “won’t be a very secure place” unless Congress approved public funds related to the ballroom. GOP senators didn’t care.

Trump said the White House “won’t be a very secure place” unless Congress approved public funds for his ballroom.

The plea didn’t work.

The problem wasn’t procedural; it was the simple fact that too many Senate Republicans weren’t willing to vote for his unpopular idea in an election year.

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-06-03T19:11:04.218Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/senate-republicans-ignore-trumps-pleas-strip-ballroom-funding-from-key-bill

A couple of weeks ago, as part of a weird press conference, Donald Trump again endorsed an effort to secure public funding for “security” measures related to his ballroom vanity project. Asked one day later what would happen if Congress didn’t approve the $1 billion in proposed funds, the president told reporters, “Then the White House won’t be a very secure place.”....

It didn’t work. Bloomberg reported:

Senate Republicans stripped federal funds for Donald Trump’s White House ballroom from a spending package after the money triggered a backlash from lawmakers in both parties.

The removal of the funds Wednesday is a fresh setback for Trump who a day earlier Senate Republicans forced to scrap a $1.8 billion fund to pay allies who claim they were unfairly targeted by the government.


The entire trajectory of this fight has been bizarre for a while. For months, Republican officials in the White House and on Capitol Hill assured the public that the ballroom project would be privately financed. In early May, however, the party’s position changed unexpectedly, and some GOP senators unveiled a package to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, which included a $1 billion provision that, if approved, would spend taxpayer dollars related to the ballroom......

The president kept lobbying, even expressing confidence that lawmakers would eventually give him what he wanted.

Whether Trump realizes this or not, however, his ability to bark orders and have others obey his directives has waned dramatically of late. He’s an unpopular incumbent trying to secure taxpayer money for an unpopular idea in an election year.

Of course, Republicans pulled the provision related to the ballroom — despite the president’s insistence that the White House “won’t be a very secure place.”

That quacking sound you hear in the distance is the sound of an increasingly lame duck.

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,910 posts)
21. MaddowBlog-Trump's legislative losing streak continues, as his grip on Congress weakens
Sun Jun 7, 2026, 03:27 PM
Jun 7

The more Republicans on Capitol Hill defy the president’s demands, the more he looks like a faltering lame duck.

After the war powers vote in the House, I started making a list of all the times congressional Republicans have ignored Trump’s wishes in recent weeks.

It quickly became apparent that it wouldn’t fit in a Bluesky post. #LameDuckWatch
www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-06-04T12:56:07.200Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trumps-legislative-losing-streak-continues

Democratic opponents of Donald Trump’s war with Iran tried seven times to pass a measure to severely restrict the president’s war powers, and seven times, Republicans balked. Two weeks ago, however, there was a breakthrough: Four GOP senators broke ranks and helped Democrats advance a war powers resolution through the upper chamber.

This week, in the House, it happened again. MS NOW reported:

More than three months after President Donald Trump first launched an attack on Iran — and, more relevantly, more than 90 days since the war began — the House successfully voted to reassert Congress’ authority over the war.

In a 215-208 vote, the House adopted a war powers resolution on Wednesday, with four Republicans joining all Democrats in support of the legislation. (Reps. Tom Barrett, R-Mich., Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., and Thomas Massie, R-Ky., voted for the resolution.
)


.....But as a political matter, the bipartisan House vote was a stinging setback for Trump, who condemned the developments with predictable rage, castigating the vote as “unpatriotic” and telling the four GOP members who backed the measure that they “should be ashamed of themselves.”.....

Indeed, Trump’s legislative losing streak is increasingly embarrassing. In recent weeks, Republicans have also:

Rejected public funding for his White House ballroom vanity project

Forced the administration to abandon its $1.766 billion compensation fund (which even some Republicans condemned as a “slush fund”)

Criticized Trump’s choice of Bill Pulte as the acting director of national intelligence

Ignored Trump’s calls to fire the Senate parliamentarian

Denounced Trump’s endorsement of Ken Paxton in Texas’ Senate race

Shelved the poorly named SAVE America Act, despite the president’s demands

Rejected the White House’s call for cuts to federal housing programs
Discarded Trump’s calls for a pause to the gas tax.

If the president were at the top of his game, riding high with a strong approval rating, it’s safe to say none of this would have happened. The list is itself evidence of his faltering fortunes.....

But with the president’s approval rating sinking to unusually low levels, polls showing Democrats relatively well positioned ahead of the midterm elections, and some Republicans joining the “YOLO caucus,” with members who are indifferent to the president’s wrath, Trump’s grip is clearly slipping.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»HAT TRICK! No SLUSH fund,...