Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(183,990 posts)
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 08:01 PM 16 hrs ago

MaddowBlog-Trump's anti-voting bill is far more radical than just a 'voter ID' proposal

The president’s poorly named Save America Act would do many things. Saving the country isn’t one of them

Trump’s anti-voting bill is far more radical than just a ‘voter ID’ proposal www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...

Philly Joe (@joehick58.bsky.social) 2026-06-26T23:12:01.553Z

https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/trump-voter-id-bill-save-america-act-congress

It’s rather common to see news organizations, which have a limited amount of space in a headline, describe the president’s proposal as a “voter ID bill.” It’s an unfortunate shorthand — because that’s just a small part of a broader package.

The proposal would make it harder to register to vote: In response to a problem that does not exist in reality, Americans who wish to register to vote would be required to prove their citizenship. That wouldn’t just be the imposition of an unnecessary hassle; it would also be an even bigger burden on tens of millions of Americans who don’t have ready access to a documentary proof of citizenship.

The proposal would make it harder to vote: In response to another problem that does not exist in reality, Americans who wish to cast ballots would be forced to meet a federal voter ID requirement, which would very likely disenfranchise many lower-income voters.

The proposal would impose new restrictions on Americans who wish to vote by mail: In response to yet another problem that also does not exist, voters who wish to take advantage of early voting through mail-in ballots — something the president himself has done many times — would have to jump through a series of new and unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles in response to baseless partisan conspiracy theories. (Those who meet a Trump-approved list of exceptions would be free to circumvent the restrictions.)

The proposal would impose new restrictions on transgender Americans: The anti-trans provisions in the bill have literally nothing to do with voting or elections administration, but Trump apparently threw them in anyway for reasons he has not fully explained.

The details of the anti-voting bill are obviously important, but so are the overarching objectives behind the White House’s demands: Trump wants to impose greater controls over who gets to vote and how, while extending his yearslong crusade to undermine public confidence in American elections in response to systemic problems that only appear to exist in his active imagination.

This is a horrible voter suppression bill.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MaddowBlog-Trump's anti-v...