General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOracle outlines all the ways it could lose the farm it bet on AI - by Tobias Mann
Amid the usual boilerplate, Big Red cited numerous risk factors related to its AI infrastructure investments in a regulatory filing published late last month.
To grow our OCI business, which requires increased computing capacity, we must incur significant capital and operating expenditures to increase our existing data center capacity and to establish data centers in new geographic locations, the filing reads, using the TLA for "Oracle Cloud Infrastructure."
These investments, the company notes, are tied to long-term commitments for infrastructure and datacenter capacity. Unlike the big three cloud providers, Oracle prefers to lease datacenter capacity from partners like Crusoe, rather than build them itself.
While the filing doesnt mention OpenAI explicitly, Oracles success as an AI infrastructure provider is inextricably tied to the model dev and its cult-of-personality leader, Sam Altman.
In early 2025, Oracle joined OpenAI, SoftBank, and MGX to put its name on the so-called Stargate initiative, an ambitious project to pave the planet with half a trillion dollars worth of bit barns.
As we later learned, Oracle had signed up to provide $300 billion of capacity over five years as part of a long term agreement with OpenAI, which would also see the database provider manage the model devs flagship facility in Abilene, Texas. In addition to the OpenAI deal, Oracle claims to still have about $155 billion in remaining performance obligations from other customers.
https://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/07/01/oracle-outlines-all-the-ways-it-could-lose-the-farm-it-bet-on-ai/5265438]
rampartd
(5,744 posts)i sure hope not.
RainCaster
(13,959 posts)Why people still use that expensive crap is beyond me. They have a truly expensive income model.
AZJonnie
(4,259 posts)Free database platforms like Postgres or even Oracle's own MySQL (community version) are great for what they are (we use them all the time for client projects in our small shop) but they lack a lot of features that truly big companies need in a database system. In a nutshell, they only scale up to a certain point before they fall over on you or don't (fully) support a data format that you want to be able to store in your RDBMS.
This is not to speak to whether full-fat Enterprise-level Oracle should be considered overpriced (it does seem so to me as well), but it does scale up to support HUGE organizations with extremely complex and large-scale data storage needs in a way that the free stuff cannot
3825-87867
(2,061 posts)Golly gee Beav,
I can't imagine who will ultimately pay for all this so a few ultra rich won't suffer!
Do I need the sarcasm?