Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,762 posts)
Mon Mar 22, 2021, 03:28 AM Mar 2021

Alabama House passes ban on curbside voting

The Alabama House on Thursday moved along a bill that would ban curbside voting statewide, something that was already not allowed but was at the center of court battles last year that ended in the country’s highest court.

Alabama law doesn’t currently address curbside voting, but several counties during the COVID-19 pandemic chose to allow ballots to be turned in by voters curbside. Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill intervened, putting a stop to curbside voting, saying that because state law didn’t specifically allow for curbside voting it was thus illegal.

The lawsuit, filed by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Southern Poverty Law Center, American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Alabama and Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program, was brought on behalf of several Alabamians with underlying medical conditions, and argued that curbside voting was needed to give them the ability to vote.

U.S. District Judge Abdul Kallon on Sept. 30 ordered Alabama to allow for curbside voting for the Nov 3 election. The state appealed, and the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals let the Kallon’s ruling on curbside voting stand.

Read more: https://www.alreporter.com/2021/03/19/alabama-house-passes-ban-on-curbside-voting/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alabama House passes ban on curbside voting (Original Post) TexasTowelie Mar 2021 OP
"because state law didn't specifically allow for" keithbvadu2 Mar 2021 #1

keithbvadu2

(40,105 posts)
1. "because state law didn't specifically allow for"
Mon Mar 22, 2021, 09:45 AM
Mar 2021

When arguing the constitution on social media:

1. Whatever is not specifically allowed must be forbidden. If this logic supports your premise.

2. Whatever is not specifically forbidden must be allowed. If this logic supports your premise.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Alabama»Alabama House passes ban ...