They are showing a very informed honest Clinton. Get em, Hilary.

The link to a conspiracy theory of JFK is not conducive to these hearings.

It's a link which proves that the public is never given the true story.


The truth about Benhgazi is mired in politics. The Republicans used the tragedy to create the impression that Mitt Romney was the next Ronald Reagan.

If you recall, Reagan destroyed Carter because Bill Casey delayed of the release of the hostages.


There is a great deal of evidence which suggests that Benghazi was supposed to give Romney a similar opportunity, so I don't think we'll ever get the real story and Hillary is certainly not in the loop, to be able to give it to us.

Unfortunately, when we do not have the transparency that is necessary to find the truth, conspiracy is not theory.

I was #2 or 4.


At Wed Jan 23, 2013, 09:06 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Please wake up people -there is no transparency here.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1011546

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

Spamming his CT website?

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jan 23, 2013, 09:18 AM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: yes, posted for no reason except to spam his website, which is a CT website about the JFK assassination. Spam Troll.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The website being linked here is clearly a conservative conspiracy site. Most people on this site will recognize that fact. It is helpful to know what a person who opposes your views are thinking. The poster rant, though lacking facts is not abusive towards any one person. The only insult is towards our intelligence, we are smarter than that!


Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

I consider inane responses to be spam.

Are you one of these spammers who attacks people who expose the truth?

There's an entire story about you here:


http://mdatoz.com/truth/

It's written by Dr. Reizer, he's a very smart man and he is clearly not a conspiracy theorist.

The only thing that is over the top is the failure to explore the truth.

We are wasting too much time on stupid hearings and stupid people who call anybody they do not agree with "a troll".


With respect to the silly Benghazi Hearings, there is only one question that matters.


"Who did it and why haven't these people been brought to justice"?


Every reasonable person agrees with me, and that means, the jury is on my side.


Peace

Reason creates unity where there is plurality.

Everything is not part of some giant conspiracy. You have been watching far too many bad Hollywood movies.

Are you trying to be funny?


Most murders are never solved.

And how many people in prison are actually innocent?

Here's a list:


http://mdatoz.com/shame


You have evidently been influenced by TV shows like CSI

Did you ever notice anytime someone attempts to question a mainstream explanation about a controversial event, which has been handed down from official sources, the individual is immediately attacked by most members of society? It’s true! If you were to suggest there were other gunmen involved in the murder of President John F. Kennedy, the people listening to you would, undoubtedly, dismiss your claim as ridiculous and classify you as a conspiracy theorist.

An inane response is unwanted spam.

Pizza's on the way.