and dependents you would qualify for a subsidy if it was less than a certain amount.

If you cannot afford the premium with or without the subsidy, you may want to talk to the ACA and see what alternatives you have.

You can be granted an exclusion from the mandate if; The lowest-priced coverage available to you, usually the Bronze plan, would cost more than eight percent of your annual household income.

I know that defeats the purpose of getting insurance, but if it fits your category at least you won't be penalized

I am able to select both links. The first link tells balanced story, the second link blames it on the ACA

When ACA passed, it went up over 35% for the following year. We are now exploring all possibilities - including a divorce after 35 solid years of marriage!

and won't be affected by the rate increase.

I think this state announcement is very suspicious. The governor never supported the ACA,so of course he's going to say the rate increases are caused by the ACA. Also, the state could -- like other states -- reject the amount of these proposed increases that are so out of line with what other states' insurers are proposing. If the state doesn't, then blame it, not the ACA.

I firmly and strictly blame the repuke governor, and his henchmen (very few women) here in this state that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Big Oil.

I'm trying again in January - AFTER we deselect Mr. Kochsucker Parnell!

expansion, too.

If he still is, the pressure will hopefully get too loud for the little kochsucker to bear.

This seems to be purely a political move by Sean and his henchmen. Not surprising since he's running for his life now.



http://www.adn.com/article/20140906/alaska-division-crosses-line-campaign-pitch-health-insurance

and we sure do miss him here in the Interior.