Announcements
Related: About this forumSeven-person juries go into effect today.
This discussion thread was locked by Skinner (a host of the Announcements group).
By popular demand, we have increased the number of jurors to evaluate community standards alerts from six to seven.
This is a fairly large technical change, and there are likely to be a few glitches. If you encounter any issues that you think the DU Admins need to be aware of, please post them in this thread.
Thank you for your understanding.
Skinner
DU Admin
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I was just on a jury but never got results I assume that means the poster was shown the door.
I'd love to encourage people to sign your jury votes it makes you take a momement and really think about the consequences of your vote. Happy jury duty everyone!
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Cha
(305,385 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)I usually read a lot of the other posts in the thread, to get the context, and I usually find when I get the results that my comment was the longest.
The result is that I very often get an email about the results as soon as I submit my vote. I was the one holding up the parade.
Apologies in advance if I do that to you. Cultivate patience.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)That took a rocket scientist. Or not.
TDale313
(7,822 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)I like it though, the bigger the jurry, the more likely to come up with a fair decision.
greatauntoftriplets
(176,839 posts)It was on your post. Don't know whether to or
one_voice
(20,043 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(176,839 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Thu Apr 3, 2014, 03:19 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Seven-person juries go into effect today.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10133677
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Whining about DU's technical glitches.
j/k Want to see if there are any obvious glitches right off the bat and what better post to send to a 7 member jury than Skinner's announcement thread.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Apr 3, 2014, 03:25 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation:
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh please.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is the most reasonable alert ever! El_Bryanto
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: WTF?
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: LOL. LLP
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: hunh... whaaaaaaaaa???! is this one of those glitches or.......?
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation:
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(176,839 posts)I wonder who alerted. I bet that Skinner knows!
one_voice
(20,043 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(176,839 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Who did it? I'd love to go for coffee or a beer with you! Lololol.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)mountain grammy
(27,271 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)PUT YOU IN.....THE COMFY CHAIR!
And poke you with THE SOFT PILLOWS!!!
BWAAAHAAAAHAAAAHAAAAAA!
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(176,839 posts)We don't know who alerted. Skinner does, I am certain.
frylock
(34,825 posts)weird!
MineralMan
(147,572 posts)I expect to be called soon on one.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)and yes, that is my view on this.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)CFLDem
(2,083 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)will this effect the new jury system?
I think my L:H ratio over time is 20:1 or so
whopis01
(3,723 posts)If you were to always vote "Leave", that means votes will only be hidden if 4 of the remaining jurors vote "Hide". In the old jury system that would be 80% of them (4 out of 5). However in the new system it will only be 66.7% (4 out of 6).
So I guess, in a sense, you will be turning the new juries that you participate in into something akin to the old juries which you did not participate in. So perhaps you could consider that being an effect upon the system.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)--Your friendly neighborhood grammar nazi.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Blatant Barney Fife and Gomer Pyle reference...
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I bow to Barney Fife! King of Nerddom
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)I don't think there ever was anyone dorkier than Barney Fife...
NIIIITAAAAA....WAAAHAAAHAAA NIIIIITA!!!!!
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)In the second case it is totally correct to say "the new jury system will effect juries on which you serve", but probably doesn't quite mean what the poster thought it did.
You're friendly neighborhood grammar nazi
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)I AM Friendly Neighborhood Grammar Nazi.
(case 2: good one!)
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Until yourve gon over teh lion.
riqster
(13,986 posts)It is good to see.
Orrex
(64,101 posts)riqster
(13,986 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(102,476 posts)Skinner
(63,645 posts)JustAnotherGen
(33,544 posts)Thanks!
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)cer7711
(509 posts)No system is perfect (given the injection of people with their complex psychologies) into theoretical constructs/systems governing the adjudication of disputed tone and content, but this certainly seems like a sensible tweak to the existing system: ties are eliminated and the "magic number" of 7 seems just right (neither too large nor too small to render fast, fair verdicts most of the time).
byronius
(7,598 posts)Maybe.
tclambert
(11,134 posts)I'm ready. Oh, too soon?
Orrex
(64,101 posts)BeyondGeography
(40,013 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)this to be a good thing.
chillfactor
(7,694 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Always hated them, and not just on DU.
William769
(55,815 posts)TexasTowelie
(116,749 posts)Let me take the next number.
William769
(55,815 posts)pinto
(106,886 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)...therefore I should be exempt from any decision regarding my posts.
Hey! I'm a OnePercenter wannabee!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Sissyk
(12,665 posts)does that increase their alerting time out? Say to....36 hours? lol!
I was just on one!
Cha
(305,385 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 4, 2014, 08:38 AM - Edit history (1)
Just kidding. I appreciate the efforts you and other Admins go to, to make this a great message board. And I believe it is.
Response to Skinner (Original post)
flamingdem This message was self-deleted by its author.
krispos42
(49,445 posts)hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Skinner
(63,645 posts)Were you on another one since then?
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)It was when I got on after getting home. The one around noon I was at work.
Unfortunately, I can't remember which trainwreck GD thread it was in.
calimary
(84,306 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Oakenshield
(628 posts)I'm sure this will be an improvement.
herding cats
(19,612 posts)I hope it helps settle things down a bit. I also hope I don't end up with hidden posts now! Maybe we'll all try and be a little nicer now that a hide will be easier to get? Hey, a girl can dream...right?
Seriously, thanks for all the hard work coding this into reality. I know it doesn't happen on its own and appreciate the effort.
kcr
(15,522 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Skinner
(63,645 posts)In the last day there were 20 alerts, and 13 were hidden. That's a much higher percentage hidden than usual.
What remains to be seen is whether it is a fluke or a trend.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I hope it is not a trend.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)So eggshells it is
mgcgulfcoast
(1,127 posts)Response to Skinner (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed