Special counsel slams idea that Trump could claim classified docs as personal records
Source: abc news
Accepting such an argument would be "pure fiction," the special counsel argued.
By Pierre Thomas, Jack Date, and Alexander Mallin
April 3, 2024, 12:11 AM
Special counsel Jack Smith, responding on Tuesday to the judge overseeing former President Donald Trump's classified documents case, urged her to reverse course on entertaining the idea that Trump had any personal ownership over the classified materials he has been charged with unlawfully possessing.
In a late-night filing replying to an order last month from Judge Aileen Cannon requesting proposed jury instructions that appeared to accept at face value what legal experts have argued is one of Trump's most fringe defenses -- that the former president had unchecked ability to claim all classified records as his personal property -- Smith argued that accepting such an argument would not only be "pure fiction," but "meritless and fatally undermined" by all the evidence gathered by the government as part of their case.
Among that evidence, according to Smith, are interviews with Trump's own Presidential Records Act representatives and "numerous" high-ranking officials from the White House, none of which "had heard Trump say that he was designating records as personal,"
"To the contrary, every witness who was asked this question had never heard such a thing," Smith's office said.
Smith's office repeatedly urged Cannon that if she continued to entertain such an interpretation of the Presidential Records Act, she "must inform the parties of that decision well in advance of trial" -- suggesting they'd seek relief from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which has already overturned her rulings twice in the case................................................
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/special-counsel-files-response-judges-order-trump-documents/story?id=108748626
Link to tweet
?s=20
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Stargazer99
(2,704 posts)Novara
(6,045 posts)Goddamn Jack Smith for not asking for her recusal. She is tanking the case in front of our eyes. And it's the most easily-proven case!
tavernier
(12,978 posts)even with a corrupt judge. He will patiently follow all the correct steps ending in her dismissal. Anything short of that will either jeopardize dismissal or be called into question by history. Our judicial system is as much on trial here as Trump and this has to be done without a trace of political stench from the good guys.
KS Toronado
(18,595 posts)Jack Smith is giving her all the rope she needs to lose her Robes.
trusty elf
(7,446 posts)![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](/emoticons/hurts.gif)
![](https://i.imgur.com/Wkvw4Bf.jpg)
Ray Bruns
(4,376 posts)Escurumbele
(3,536 posts)She must be taken out, one because of her inexperience, and two because she has shown to be biased towards trump, she seems to be wanting to pay a debt to trump for placing her in a place she does not belong.
303squadron
(648 posts)She wrote a few days ago.......
"We discussed this request when the Judge first issued it in this post, all the way down at the bottom. The Judge issued this order in lieu of ruling on Trumps request to dismiss the case under the Presidential Records Act. Instead, she seems to be telling the parties shes going to decide it applies, but ask them to give her alternative jury instructions for two different situations, depending on how she decides it applies. In the first scenario, its up to the jury to decide whether each classified document was magically morphed into a personal item by Trump before he left the White House. In the second scenario, its all up to Trump. If he testifies or somehow adduces evidence at trial he designated the records hes charged with retaining as personal, no one, not even the jury, can second guess him. Cannon doesnt say it in her order, but that can only mean the charges would be due to be dismissed.
This is nutsits up to the Judge to decide in the first instance whether the Presidential Records Act applies at all here. Juries resolve factual disputes. Its up to the Judge to decide what the law says. And there is literally no authority that suggests that the Presidential Records Act somehow means you cant prosecute someone who mishandles National Defense information. The Judge should have dismissed Trumps motion out of hand, and if she had granted it, the government could have taken an appeal.
Thats the heart of the problem here, as Ive discussed before. By kicking the can down the road to trial, shes setting up a scenario where she could rule in Trumps favor and dismiss the case after a jury was sworn in. And at that point, the government couldnt appeal. Thats because of double jeopardy. The government cant try a defendant twice on the same charges, so if Judge Cannon were to dismiss the case after trial started, the government couldnt appeal her because they couldnt retry the case even if they won. "
Smith is trying to force her hand in this ruling and use it for an appeal to the 11th District court!
NoMoreRepugs
(10,152 posts)here?
Irish_Dem
(55,272 posts)Juvenile, immature and oppositional.
303squadron
(648 posts)Judge loose Cannon!
Freethinker65
(10,686 posts)Each administration's President could remove ALL classified and non-classified documents (including National Security documents, trade negotiation documents, to keep them from future administrations. They could maintain and distribute them as they please, perhaps even destroy them or sell them. There would be no continuity of government.
If so, deny Trump any security briefings now, saying Biden intends, if the country was careless enough to elect Trump, all Government Documents (because currently, by Trump logic, they are his) are Biden's. Biden will keep such information safe and away from Trump until Trump is out of office. Of course this is obviously ridiculous and dangerous, but would be allowed if Cannon rules Trump "owned" everything while in office so was allowed to take everything when he left.
MissMillie
(38,826 posts)This interpretation of the PRA would render the PRA moot.
Irish_Dem
(55,272 posts)Wipe out the entire cache of top secret material.
Sell them, barter, blackmail with them.
Doesn't sound a like a national security issue does it?
Emile
(27,383 posts)oldsoftie
(13,339 posts)Never get an answer.