Texas Warned It Could Lose Millions in Federal Funding
Source: Newsweek
Published Jun 12, 2024 at 5:26 AM EDT | Updated Jun 12, 2024 at 10:54 AM EDT
Texas could face penalties from federal authorities if delays in administering SNAP benefits and medical cover continue.
The Biden administration has sent several letters to Texas officials warning them over persistent delays relating to Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, Democratic representative Lloyd Doggett has revealed. Officials from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services (CMS) have said the state could lose federal funding for the programs if the issues, which include major backlogs in processing benefits and the issuance of health coverage, aren't promptly rectified.
Doggett laid the blame on Governor Greg Abbott. Responding to the letters, he said that "the indifference of Governor Abbott has left millions of vulnerable families without access to a family physician or the ability to put food on the table."
"While belated actions from USDA and CMS are much needed, Texans will continue to suffer until we have competent state leadership that prioritizes those most in need," he continued. "Any loss of federal funding, even administrative funds, would be a direct result of the Abbott HHSC's failures."
Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/texas-lose-millions-federal-funding-snap-medicaid-1911601
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)They could have had Beto.
Polybius
(21,811 posts)We should have run a Manchin type there.
Evolve Dammit
(21,736 posts)Polybius
(21,811 posts)You don't say that and expect to win a statewide race in Texas.
flying_wahini
(8,268 posts)onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Traurigkeit
(1,290 posts)Old Crank
(6,910 posts)Traurigkeit
(1,290 posts)making voting harder.
Old Crank
(6,910 posts)Who show up wins in state wide elections.
The last Texas midterms about 48% of voters showed up.
Traurigkeit
(1,290 posts)ananda
(34,954 posts)I don't blame the candidate.
I blame the voters.
Lemon Lyman
(1,585 posts)I go both ways on this, siding with you and the OP.
I've lived a majority of my life here, in Iowa. I call it a sh*thole, which I'm pretty sure has angered (an)other Iowan(s) here on DU. Politically it's an awful state. It's pretty "blah" for my tastes too. It doesn't have a lot of good shopping/entertainment options. I like places like Madison, WI...Minneapolis, & Seattle.
I'm sure many people think, "If you hate it so much there, leave." Moving to another state isn't easy. It takes $$. Even if you have the $$, you may have family and friends you're not comfortable leaving.
So I see it both ways. Me and mine work hard to make this a blue state. We keep being outvoted by the red ppl. So, technically, yes, we get the state government we deserve (en masse). But it's harsh to say those of us who are liberals are to blame for the sh*t states in which we live.
jackcrow2001
(20 posts)I'm a resident of West Virginia pretty much the Trumpiest state of the Union. I often wonder if the Republican party ran a ballot issue specifically stating outright "This measure is intended to enrich the richest citizens of the state at the expense of all others in the state of West Virginia" not if it would pass.....but by how large a majority. The state of West Virginia seems incapable of considering anything other than placing the idea of coal jobs on a sacred altar, there are somewhere around 13,900 coal industry jobs in West Virginia, population 1,766,107 or so I keep telling folks that it will only be hundreds of millions of years for some new coal to form.....so lets just hold our breath and keep putting all of our efforts into coal. Bottom line I love my people I love my state, but I have no hope that enough residents of West Virginia will wake up to see how little voting Republican does anything to improve their lives. I vote, and I will always vote in spite of how unlikely it is that I will ever vote for a winning candidate in this state.
Later Days
Trueblue Texan
(4,391 posts)...who continue to fight this fight while being continually kicked by those on this site who just don't f*ing GET it about Texas! It's not just that there are too many Republicans. It's not that everyone is the ignorant Rethug many here would like to believe. It's that we are super gerrymandered and it's about to get worse if the legislature has its way: state races will be determined by districts much the way the electoral college works in the president and vice-president races, NOT by majority.
Dems have had their hands tied in so many ways in this state, it's pretty damn demoralizing and your criticism doesn't help. It would be a lot more constructive if you'd send funds to Dem candidates in Texas, or phone bank, write letters to the editor in support of Dem candidates. It'd be a hell of a trophy on the national level to turn Texas blue. Have you done anything to make that a reality? I'll guarantee it's less than me of any of the Dems I know, so if you don't mind, don't characterize all or most Texans with your insults.
You can put your money where your mouth is by going to the Texas Dem website and donating or volunteering. That'd be a lot more useful than kicking the Dems who have always worked hard for Democrats. https://www.texasdemocrats.org
Deep State Witch
(12,695 posts)The cruelty is the point.
atreides1
(16,799 posts)Those who continue to vote for Republicans are going to get just as screwed as those who don't.
Republicans across this country are more than willing to sit idly by as their own families suffer...as long as people they hate suffer, too!
RussBLib
(10,573 posts)...wouldn't that hurt the same poorer families they are trying to help even more?
LakeArenal
(29,949 posts)Texas could start supporting programs that help the poor.
Bayard
(29,415 posts)"Biden cuts programs for the poor."
LakeArenal
(29,949 posts)Again Biden has NOTHING to do with the budgeted SNAP funds being used or not in Texass.
He can take them back if Texas wont use them and disperse to other poor people.
Then the headline might read: New Funds for the poor in any place.
SomewhereInTheMiddle
(650 posts)I wondered what other Feral spending would hurt the state government and governor directly, but not most of the people of Texas. What federal funds go to upkeep of the Capital, Governor's mansion/perks, corporate welfare, and other non-citizen focused budgets. Cutting those funds as direct punishment for not spending welfare funds as directed seems more effective than cutting the funds Abbott is not spending anyway.
May not be within the authority of the President. And given what Trump would do if he had that kind of discretion for targeted budgetary revenge, maybe it should not be.
What to do? What to do?
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)the Feds will be looking into that!
70sEraVet
(5,433 posts)Has Texas already received the funds, and is dragging its feet about disbursing them?
TeamProg
(6,630 posts)Lonestarblue
(13,444 posts)Prior to the change, under the Clinton administration, cash assistance was paid to welfare recipients. Under the block grants, Republicans especially have used the money for everything but assistance, including buying cars for Republicans and paying money to crisis pregnancy centers.
In 1998, nearly 60 percent of welfare spending was on cash benefits, categorized as basic assistance. By 2014, it was only about one-quarter of TANF spending. That shift has happened despite a burgeoning economics literature suggesting that direct cash transfers are in many cases the most efficient tool to fight poverty.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/most-welfare-dollars-dont-go-directly-to-poor-people-anymore/
Direct cash assistance got money directly into the hands of the people who needed it. Now they get pennies instead. These block grants have become just another way for state governments to cheat poor people.
BradBo
(996 posts)republianmushroom
(22,252 posts)this is the way it is. No morals, no ethics the republican way.
TBF
(36,413 posts)he is too busy on his quest to use vouchers to get all the kiddos into religious schools (this is being funded by various billionaires both here in Texas and in other states). Vouchers & the border are all he is focused on right now ...
ArkansasDemocrat1
(3,213 posts)oh well
flying_wahini
(8,268 posts)Gov Hot Wheels WANTS the headline to read against Dems. Thats how he rolls.
Fla Dem
(27,566 posts)orangecrush
(29,962 posts)Democrats should run ads in Texas making sure these families know who is doing this.
surfered
(13,050 posts)...Feed the poor and welcome the stranger. Nope they're not doing that. They prefer putting razor wire on buoys in the Rio Grande. Kinda opposite of welcoming the stranger. Instead of feeding the hungry, they'll end SNAP. Not sure I see the Godliness that Alito keeps taking about.
NanaCat
(2,332 posts)That enjoys inflicting cruelty and even death on people. Remember, it's a religion with a demigod who physically attacked people because they offended him, advocated for the murder of disobedient children, called foreigners dogs, and repeatedly revels in torturing people forever for not agreeing with him.
Sounds mighty GQP to me.
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
kingvitamin This message was self-deleted by its author.
bluestarone
(22,030 posts)Run ads that need to be run in Texas. People in Texas needs to KNOW THE TRUTH as to why the money in being cut.
Upthevibe
(10,167 posts)slightlv
(7,729 posts)but a cut of funds like detailed above *only* hurts those who need help the most; and plays right into Abbott's cruelty. He'll just blame it on the Democrats cutting the funding now. He's got his butt covered. Meanwhile, people starve and die unnecessarily. Surely there is something they need those federal dollars for that hits the government, itself, closer to home. I mean, like the legislature, judges, etc. I don't know. I willingly admit I don't know where the cuts could happen, but this just seems like piling cruelty upon cruelty. How about cutting out the state middleman, and issuing vouchers to those eligible, directly? Could something like that be done?
I fear we may have to think of alternative ways around these fascist states until they finally see the light and throw the bums out. And I live in one of them, so I'm talking about taking lumps, too. But these states are completely ignoring the Supremacy clause and giving Washington the middle finger. Back in the 1800s, that would basically have constituted secession, IMO. What not today? And I'm back to thinking of ways to corral them into their own little section of the country, and let us get on with progressing towards a more perfect union. Some days, it feels like there are so many different ways to see a problem, you run out of hands describing 'em.
walkingman
(10,732 posts)is a very low bar. In contrast, even George W. Bush looks decent, and he should actually be in prison, in my opinion.
The entire Abbott administration are lowlifes, and it says a lot about the citizens of Texas who continually re-elect these people.
The last decent Gov. Texas had was 30 years ago with Gov. Ann Richards. It has been a steep decline since.
Dr. T
(609 posts)their pro-life views? "Nothing is more precious than the sanctity of human life" yet withholding food will cause some to starve to death. I can't stress this enough: They are anti-abortion, not pro-life. I've noticed that it really gets under their skin when you say that to their face.
lonely bird
(2,894 posts)It squares with White Christianity.
aggiesal
(10,737 posts)You want to hit them where it hurts? Stop funding programs other than SNAP & CHIP, like highway maintenance or remove the tax benefits from Oil.
Keep the SNAP and CHIP, just make those that need get them from they're local Social Security/Medicare Offices.
This appears to be a stunt by the state (R)'s. To them it's like, "OK, we don't want SNAP or CHIP anyway."