Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(50,249 posts)
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 06:36 PM Jul 26

FBI Says Trump Was Struck by Bullet or Its Fragment

Source: Daily Beast via Yahoo w reporting by Fox

The FBI has reportedly confirmed former President Donald Trump was indeed shot by a bullet, ending speculation about what exactly bloodied Trump’s ear.

The agency told Fox News reporter Jacqui Heinrich in a statement on Friday afternoon, “What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject’s rifle,” the statement read. The statement was also posted by Fox’s Bret Baier.


Read more: https://ca.news.yahoo.com/fbi-says-trump-struck-bullet-221529854.html

81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FBI Says Trump Was Struck by Bullet or Its Fragment (Original Post) Bernardo de La Paz Jul 26 OP
I smell a sharpie shelshaw Jul 26 #1
what did it hit first that caused it to shatter. when it hit him (allegedly) it was either whole or shattered nt msongs Jul 26 #2
My Question, Too ProfessorGAC Jul 26 #19
Yep...sounds like the "magic bullet" theory once again. Bengus81 Jul 27 #44
It was a graze DetroitLegalBeagle Jul 27 #53
doesn't make sense azureblue Jul 27 #50
Um, yeah, we saw it happen live on the tv. But thanks fbi. Think. Again. Jul 26 #3
TV cameras are not going to capture a bullet in flight. Hermit-The-Prog Jul 26 #31
Doesn't really answer the question anyway unblock Jul 26 #4
The tiny piece of something was a bullet or a bullet fragment Bernardo de La Paz Jul 26 #6
The pictures don't show the injury at all unblock Jul 26 #11
Pictures showing the injury "at all" Bernardo de La Paz Jul 26 #12
I meant we didn't see the moment of contact with whatever unblock Jul 26 #13
Agree 100%. They want a mystery, that's what they want. bluestarone Jul 27 #74
Piece of a bullet - fair enough. forgotmylogin Jul 27 #40
I just see blood. Blood can pool due to the shape of the ear. LeftInTX Jul 27 #59
Ugh... thanks but no thanks. ShazzieB Jul 27 #67
Glad your okay, sorry for jolt. I did title it about the injury, but it's possible to scroll into it accidentally. . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 27 #68
Yeah, i tend to scroll too fast sometimes. ShazzieB Jul 27 #70
Might have been a less lethal bullet in the first position? IbogaProject Jul 26 #36
A setup .... stopdiggin Jul 27 #60
What exactly is a "less lethal bullet"? EX500rider Jul 27 #63
Someone did actually die. eggplant Jul 27 #64
Wray's way of covering his ass. poli-junkie Jul 26 #5
We still ain't seeing anything from the Drs. who treated him BoRaGard Jul 26 #8
Hope that doctor isn't like so many witnesses in the JFK assassination. Bengus81 Jul 27 #45
They can't force someone to stay for observation. ShazzieB Jul 27 #69
Yep. Wray is still covering his buddy's ass. BComplex Jul 27 #66
the FBI are always there to help out their dear friend, tRump. nt ImNotGod Jul 26 #7
Well donald, when you lie all the time thats what happens... IcyPeas Jul 26 #9
Did I miss the analysis? Trajectories and destinations of each round fired? bullimiami Jul 26 #10
here ya go thatdemguy Jul 26 #16
This is amazing. gristy Jul 26 #34
It is amazing. Why is it coming from random internet guys and not the FBI? Scrivener7 Jul 27 #72
That is not what wray said the other day. niyad Jul 26 #14
True. Also true is that what he said then is consistent with not knowing at that time. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 26 #17
A what did change gab13by13 Jul 26 #20
He didn't change his story. He didn't know then. He knows more now. Bernardo de La Paz Jul 26 #23
I prefer to get my information from a reliable source rather than the mouth piece for Putin's pet pig. Ford_Prefect Jul 26 #15
Thanks. I posted early, as soon as I felt the story had some reality. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 26 #18
What changed from Wray's first report? gab13by13 Jul 26 #21
What changed is Wray internally got more information from a partially completed investigation ongoing. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 26 #26
Wray never did say it WASN'T a bullet stopdiggin Jul 27 #61
I'll believe it when they prove it William Seger Jul 26 #22
You know what? We have to let this go FakeNoose Jul 26 #24
Agreed. It is disheartening when members op up & make claims already debunked. Kamala is the big story. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 26 #25
I am glad he wasn't killed, because we would not survive his martyrdom niyad Jul 26 #27
Agreed on both points.. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 26 #28
Not only was he not killed, but it didn't leave any visible mark. SunSeeker Jul 27 #54
I have been dismayed at the CT thinking, the flat-out untruths (repeated still despite repeated debunking) and overall Celerity Jul 27 #42
I agree. ShazzieB Jul 27 #73
We'll find out eventually, I'm OK with that FakeNoose Jul 27 #78
They literally dont know if it was a bullet or a fragment? Thats not really going to clear it up. Blues Heron Jul 26 #29
What gets me is.. Omnipresent Jul 26 #30
Seems so, but I read (unverified) reports that they sighted him and requested permission to shoot Bernardo de La Paz Jul 26 #32
All that you've said.. Omnipresent Jul 26 #35
completely valid, while NOT touching on the subject of the OP stopdiggin Jul 27 #62
A trumping mystery... sanduca Jul 26 #33
You're probably right about the superficiality of the wound(s). ShazzieB Jul 27 #75
This whole thing reminds me of The Magic Loogie on Seinfeld. Talitha Jul 27 #37
I don't see that it matters. It doesn't change the fact markodochartaigh Jul 27 #38
So it took the FBI two weeks to figure out what everyone else already knew. egduj Jul 27 #39
That poor fragments going to need therapy as I when it touch Trump with 10-foot pole. cstanleytech Jul 27 #41
His hole in one Deb Jul 27 #43
The bullet hit his head and bounced off. It was on FOX. twodogsbarking Jul 27 #46
The fatal shot that killed a spectator went through his skull. GreenWave Jul 27 #47
And probably came out the other as there wasn't anything blocking it's passage. cstanleytech Jul 27 #48
Was the victim behind him or in front of him? MichMan Jul 28 #80
I am thinking he was behind... GreenWave Jul 29 #81
Sounds like the federalist society got to Wray Clouds Passing Jul 27 #49
Has the FBI seen the medical report on Pendejo45's injury? ... aggiesal Jul 27 #51
This for some reason does pass the smell test, republianmushroom Jul 27 #52
97 months and counting. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 27 #55
No, only, 42 months and counting, but that includes a whole lot of foot dragging. republianmushroom Jul 27 #56
Actually more like 57 months and counting. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 27 #57
No, only, 42 months and counting, but that includes a whole lot of foot dragging. republianmushroom Jul 27 #58
Very high velocity rounds like that tend to be very destructive. BrightKnight Jul 27 #65
Sure would love to see a medical report. Scrivener7 Jul 27 #71
The real story here is not whether it was a bullet Flatrat Jul 27 #76
Looks like the Russian controlled part of the FBI nakocal Jul 27 #77
Projectile shart fragments struck Trump in the ear. twodogsbarking Jul 28 #79

msongs

(69,238 posts)
2. what did it hit first that caused it to shatter. when it hit him (allegedly) it was either whole or shattered nt
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 06:38 PM
Jul 26

ProfessorGAC

(68,108 posts)
19. My Question, Too
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 07:56 PM
Jul 26

Bullets don't just fragment in mid-air. If it was a fragment, it had to hit something first.
I've seen the bullet test on Forged In Fire. The bullet is fine until it hits the sword!

Bengus81

(7,255 posts)
44. Yep...sounds like the "magic bullet" theory once again.
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 07:54 AM
Jul 27

His ear wouldn't have looked that good if a fully intact bullet hit it. No question there.........

DetroitLegalBeagle

(2,072 posts)
53. It was a graze
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 11:39 AM
Jul 27

Grazes don't destroy anything beyond the tiny area the bullet touches. There isn't enough resistance in a grazing wound to transfer much of the bullets kinetic energy.

azureblue

(2,250 posts)
50. doesn't make sense
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 09:54 AM
Jul 27

the Ak fires a small bullet that is designed to tumble when it hits something. It would have to hit something pretty hard to break apart, and there is nothing between that would cause that.

unblock

(53,787 posts)
4. Doesn't really answer the question anyway
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 06:41 PM
Jul 26

I think people are more wondering about the nature of the contact.

Did a tiny piece of something pierce his ear? Or did something graze against it, a side-swipe? Or the damage due to impact, friction, or heat transfer?

Bernardo de La Paz

(50,249 posts)
6. The tiny piece of something was a bullet or a bullet fragment
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 06:44 PM
Jul 26

It grazed the ear, it did not go through the ear. The pictures show that clearly.

unblock

(53,787 posts)
11. The pictures don't show the injury at all
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 06:55 PM
Jul 26

The pic showed a bullet went near him, and that surely had much to do with the injury, but it doesn't tell us if the whole bullet grazed him or a fragment from it traveling close to it grazed him or whatever.

If they recovered the bullet intact, that would be helpful.

unblock

(53,787 posts)
13. I meant we didn't see the moment of contact with whatever
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 07:18 PM
Jul 26

If that pic is enough to know it was a whole bullet or a part of a bullet or displaced mosquito that had the misfortune of being in the path of the bullet and if it was heat or friction or impact that cause the injury, fine.

Clear as mud to me.

bluestarone

(17,824 posts)
74. Agree 100%. They want a mystery, that's what they want.
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 03:52 PM
Jul 27

.This is crazy. NOTHING is clear about contradicting statements from the FBI. We should ALL know better that to trust anyone from TFG's secret service or personal DR'S. PERIOD!

forgotmylogin

(7,636 posts)
40. Piece of a bullet - fair enough.
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 03:00 AM
Jul 27

I rewatched the video and he flinches like a bug bit him, not like someone hit by a bullet full speed.

Early speculation was he was hit by a chunk of glass from the teleprompter, but it makes sense it was a tiny bullet fragment that ricocheted off something else and was going much slower than bullet-speed. Potentially a round hit the floor and a shard could have bounced up past his ear.

I can see two notches in his ear in the picture - he is extremely lucky to have survived that. An inch to the side could have hit him in the neck or the eye or his skull. But that bestows him no special ability nor talent except his own personal whatever dark-soul-genie deal he made to continuously roll 20s. Guns are just as dangerous as they were before Donold became a lucky shooting survivor. So many kids and regular people haven't been so lucky when randomly shot at.

ShazzieB

(17,841 posts)
67. Ugh... thanks but no thanks.
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 03:18 PM
Jul 27

I used to have a very intense (i.e., adrenaline flooded) reaction to any sudden image of blood and injury,. I'm happy to say I'm (mostly) over it, but that gave me a bit of a jolt.

I know it was highly pertinent to the discussion, so I understand why it was posted. I'm just weird.

Bernardo de La Paz

(50,249 posts)
68. Glad your okay, sorry for jolt. I did title it about the injury, but it's possible to scroll into it accidentally. . nt
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 03:21 PM
Jul 27

IbogaProject

(3,291 posts)
36. Might have been a less lethal bullet in the first position?
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 11:40 PM
Jul 26

I know it's a crazy idea, but the other side loves that stuff. I think it was a setup. But now we've taken the momentum for now.

stopdiggin

(12,341 posts)
60. A setup ....
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 12:33 PM
Jul 27

less lethal bullet ...
Jebus H.! You're right - crazy idea. The kind that we'd be better off not passing around.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

EX500rider

(11,192 posts)
63. What exactly is a "less lethal bullet"?
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 01:31 PM
Jul 27

Wax?
Rubber?
The FBI would have find traces of those.

Slower?
At that range using a underpowered bullet would make trajectory very uncertain, esp mixed in with regular hi-powered bullets.
If it had the speed to get there it had the speed to kill you IMO

BoRaGard

(2,014 posts)
8. We still ain't seeing anything from the Drs. who treated him
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 06:44 PM
Jul 26

What's up with that?

Only the republican pill-popper has opined. I don't trust him.

Did the FBI finally talk to the Drs after two freaking weeks?

Then say so, for crying out loud.

Bengus81

(7,255 posts)
45. Hope that doctor isn't like so many witnesses in the JFK assassination.
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 08:10 AM
Jul 27

They just had unfortunate "accidents" as the years went by. Sure they did.............

BTW...I fail to see how Trump went to a hospital, got all the tests,shots and care a shooting victim would needed yet was seen exciting his plane in NJ in such a short period of time. I would think they would have at least held him overnight for observation.

ShazzieB

(17,841 posts)
69. They can't force someone to stay for observation.
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 03:28 PM
Jul 27

I think they ask you to sign something that acknowledges you're leaving "against medical advice" (so you can't sue them blind if your condition worsens or something), but they can't make you stay.

Remembering how Trump acted when he had covid (making a big show of being a lot less sick than he really was), I could easily see him declining to stay for observation if he was asked to, Gotta show the voters what a big, tough, macho man he is!

IcyPeas

(22,280 posts)
9. Well donald, when you lie all the time thats what happens...
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 06:54 PM
Jul 26

Even..... even if there's an an iota of truth to your story we're not going to believe it.

Signed,
The Boy Who Cried Wolf



bullimiami

(13,683 posts)
10. Did I miss the analysis? Trajectories and destinations of each round fired?
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 06:54 PM
Jul 26

There’s a whole lot of “saying” and a whole little of science.

gab13by13

(23,789 posts)
20. A what did change
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 08:09 PM
Jul 26

Was TSF attacked Wray and said he should be removed. Then Wray changed his story. What made Wray change, not a forensic report.

Bernardo de La Paz

(50,249 posts)
23. He didn't change his story. He didn't know then. He knows more now.
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 08:18 PM
Jul 26

Imagine Biden saying about some event: "I don't know if it was mini-submarine or a small surface boat", and then a few days later saying "We can say now that it was a surface boat", then nobody here would be claiming he "changed his story". We should apply the same standard to the utterances of Wray, since they follow the same pattern. As to reports, Wray gets preliminary reports while investigations are still on going and before they have completed a thorough analysis and before they are ready to release.

Ford_Prefect

(8,147 posts)
15. I prefer to get my information from a reliable source rather than the mouth piece for Putin's pet pig.
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 07:27 PM
Jul 26
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/26/trump-bullet-shrapnel-ronny-jackson-christopher-wray/ff7154ec-4ba2-11ef-9149-c75da5dd9201_story.html

The Washington Post

FBI says Trump was indeed struck by bullet during assassination attempt
The FBI says former President Donald Trump was struck in the ear by a bullet during an assassination attempt on July 13, as the agency moved Friday to clarify what happened after nearly two weeks of confusion and conflicting accounts

By Jill Colvin, Eric Tucker, Bernard Condon and Jim Mustian | AP
July 26, 2024 at 7:18 p.m. EDT

WASHINGTON — Nearly two weeks after Donald Trump’s near assassination, the FBI confirmed Friday that it was indeed a bullet that struck the former president’s ear, moving to clear up conflicting accounts about what caused the former president’s injuries after a gunman opened fire at a Pennsylvania rally.

Cut through the 2024 election noise. Get The Campaign Moment newsletter.
“What struck former President Trump in the ear was a bullet, whether whole or fragmented into smaller pieces, fired from the deceased subject’s rifle,” the agency said in a statement.

The statement from the FBI marked the most definitive law enforcement account of Trump’s injuries and followed ambiguous comments earlier in the week from Director Christopher Wray that appeared to cast doubt on whether Trump had actually been hit by a bullet.


The article includes a photo which appears to show where the points of contact were on the ear in question.

Some may scoff at the Post for editorial choices they have made. I refuse to use FOX News for ANY purpose since it lies as often as their lips move.

Bernardo de La Paz

(50,249 posts)
26. What changed is Wray internally got more information from a partially completed investigation ongoing. . . . nt
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 08:24 PM
Jul 26

stopdiggin

(12,341 posts)
61. Wray never did say it WASN'T a bullet
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 12:41 PM
Jul 27

His statement was that it was not clearly established (at that time)

William Seger

(10,906 posts)
22. I'll believe it when they prove it
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 08:17 PM
Jul 26

I can't seem to find the evidence and reasoning they used to reach that conclusion. I'm still convinced it wasn't a bullet still travelling at supersonic speed, because if it was, Trump would have described hearing a loud crack like a bullwhip, not a "loud whizzing sound."

FakeNoose

(34,587 posts)
24. You know what? We have to let this go
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 08:19 PM
Jul 26

We're getting sidetracked arguing about stupid stuff. The result is the same.

There's an extremely important presidential election happening right now. We have to keep our eyes on the prize. Let the ChumpHumpers wallow in stupid arguments and fake news.

Remember the story about the tortoise and the hare? We're heading to the finish line and we won't be distracted.

Let's go team - all hands on deck.

Bernardo de La Paz

(50,249 posts)
25. Agreed. It is disheartening when members op up & make claims already debunked. Kamala is the big story. . . . nt
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 08:23 PM
Jul 26

niyad

(117,641 posts)
27. I am glad he wasn't killed, because we would not survive his martyrdom
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 08:26 PM
Jul 26

and canonization.

Near death experiences make some people reevaluate their lives. Such is not the case here.

SunSeeker

(53,001 posts)
54. Not only was he not killed, but it didn't leave any visible mark.
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 11:49 AM
Jul 27



More pics of his unbandaged ear from his Logan Act violating meeting with Netanyahu:

https://www.indy100.com/politics/trump/trump-ear-without-bandage

Celerity

(46,154 posts)
42. I have been dismayed at the CT thinking, the flat-out untruths (repeated still despite repeated debunking) and overall
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 06:52 AM
Jul 27

lack of discernment exhibited by some since day one. You still have some claiming it was all staged and/or clinging the Teleprompter-Truther stance.

ShazzieB

(17,841 posts)
73. I agree.
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 03:45 PM
Jul 27

We have a lot of questions and not nearly enough clear answers yet, and the lack of info from the doctor(s) who treated TSF is particularly infuriating, imo. But we'll never be able to fully resolve anything in a messageboard discussion. We just don't have access to enough information.

I know it can be hard to let go of something like this when you're dying to know the real facts, but sometimes that's all you can do.

FakeNoose

(34,587 posts)
78. We'll find out eventually, I'm OK with that
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 06:55 PM
Jul 27

We should be asking ourselves this: The Repukes have pored over every tiny detail of Hunter Biden's sex life, but not one of them is calling for an investigation into this assassination attempt.

Why aren't they outraged like we know they can get? Because they've been told it's a nothing-burger and don't push it. Maybe they're trying way too hard to get us distracted by it, hmmm?


Blues Heron

(6,073 posts)
29. They literally dont know if it was a bullet or a fragment? Thats not really going to clear it up.
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 08:36 PM
Jul 26

We`ll have to wait for more analysis to come in for the definitive answer - so far he got hit by something, that’s about it. Maybe bullet, maybe a fragment? What did the bullet hit then if it was a fragment? Sounds like they dont have the trajectories pinned down yet. Wait and see.

Omnipresent

(6,083 posts)
30. What gets me is..
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 08:36 PM
Jul 26

When the secret service sharp shooters were high up on their roof, why weren’t they looking through their scopes beforehand??

I’m sure if they did, they would have spotted the guy on the far away roof, then this shit would have never happened.

Bernardo de La Paz

(50,249 posts)
32. Seems so, but I read (unverified) reports that they sighted him and requested permission to shoot
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 09:10 PM
Jul 26

... requested permission to shoot him before he fired. In a period of 80 seconds to two minutes before he fired.

Multiple failures, any one of which could have thwarted the attempt. (List not not complete or vetted)

1) Roof was not monitored at time assassin climbed up. Various reasons given: root too hot for comfort, break time, own initiative to go do something else, and more.

2) Reports of the gun and the range finder were not take seriously.

3) One report may have reached the command centre and a cop sent out to check it out, results unknown.

4) Reports of drone flight hour or two before shots not noticed by USSS.

5) Why didn't tRump get hustled off the stage right away.

6) Trump was allowed to get on stage though reports of a possible shooter were circulating.

Omnipresent

(6,083 posts)
35. All that you've said..
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 10:40 PM
Jul 26

It just makes me wonder why the SS had handled the situation in such an amateurish way.

stopdiggin

(12,341 posts)
62. completely valid, while NOT touching on the subject of the OP
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 12:46 PM
Jul 27

"bullet. or bullet fragment - from shooter's gun"

sanduca

(56 posts)
33. A trumping mystery...
Fri Jul 26, 2024, 09:24 PM
Jul 26

The shooter was after any politician. I believe even President Biden was in his agenda. Anyone in the area would have been his victim.
However, trumputin has told his inner circle to say nothing. Why would that be?
My guess is that his wounds are superficial but he wants to raise money out of the scuff he got. He claims he took a bullet for democracy. He also incited January 6 coup for democracy. He also had fake electors for democracy.
Anyone who believes his bullshit is as dumb as his cult.

ShazzieB

(17,841 posts)
75. You're probably right about the superficiality of the wound(s).
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 03:56 PM
Jul 27

If he wanted to raise money off his supposed "brush with death," he maybe should have kept wearing the bandage for a while longer. Publicly displaying a perfectly normal looking ear this soon after the incident isn't helping his credibility, lol.

However, we know he's not very smart and neither are his followers. The MAGA crowd may consider these pics to be evidence of a miraculous healing rather than a reason to question his version of events!

markodochartaigh

(1,644 posts)
38. I don't see that it matters. It doesn't change the fact
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 12:37 AM
Jul 27

that an assassin got within shooting distance of a presidential candidate.

And, personally, I find the FBI not to be particularly credible.

I think that it is not believable that Trump or anyone physically close to him immediately after the shots were fired knew in advance of the shooting. That advance knowledge would be required for an injury to be simulated. I don't believe that in the heat of the moment Trump or anyone else would have come up with a plan to fake an injury. I don't think that anyone would, and we ain't exactly dealing with the fastest bosons in the supercollider here.

And whether it was a bullet or shrapnel it came very close to ending Trump's participation in the race. I think that it is not plausible that we were anything other than extremely fortunate. A wounded or martyred Trump would have guaranteed a Republican president and probably both houses of Congress.

aggiesal

(9,277 posts)
51. Has the FBI seen the medical report on Pendejo45's injury? ...
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 10:42 AM
Jul 27

When it comes to Pendejo45, question everything.

A couple of days ago, FBI Director Christopher Wray testifying before Congress, said: 'With respect to former president Trump, there’s some question about whether or not it’s a bullet or shrapnel that hit his ear'
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2024/jul/25/fbi-director-questions-bullet-shrapnel-hit-trump-video

I believe the WH put pressure on the FBI to come out with a statement, affirming Pendejo45's side of events.

Until the medical report is released, I'm not buying any of this.

BrightKnight

(3,663 posts)
65. Very high velocity rounds like that tend to be very destructive.
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 02:30 PM
Jul 27

That is why the DoD uses them. They deliver lots of energy and shockwaves in a small bullet. It is surprising that he didn’t even need stitches.

Flatrat

(109 posts)
76. The real story here is not whether it was a bullet
Sat Jul 27, 2024, 04:35 PM
Jul 27

or a fragment , or sharpie or anything else.

The real story here that a person was "allowed" (most likely by negligence) to get close enough to take a shot with a rifle at a presidential candidate, and kill someone else in the process.

The ear conjecture is media entertainment, and a far secondary story.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FBI Says Trump Was Struck...