Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(152,671 posts)
Thu Aug 1, 2024, 06:38 AM Aug 2024

Federal judge says New Jersey's ban on AR-15 rifles is unconstitutional

Source: AP

Updated 6:49 PM EDT, July 31, 2024


TRENTON, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey’s ban on the AR-15 rifle is unconstitutional, but the state’s cap on magazines over 10 rounds passes constitutional muster, a federal judge said Tuesday. U.S. District Judge Peter Sheridan’s 69-page opinion says he was compelled to rule as he did because of the Supreme Court’s rulings in firearms cases, particularly the 2022 Bruen decision that expanded gun rights.

Sheridan’s ruling left both 2nd Amendment advocates and the state attorney general planning appeals. The judge temporarily delayed the order for 30 days. Pointing to the high court’s precedents, Sheridan suggested Congress and the president could do more to curb gun-related violence nationwide.

“It is hard to accept the Supreme Court’s pronouncements that certain firearms policy choices are ‘off the table’ when frequently, radical individuals possess and use these same firearms for evil purposes,” he wrote.

Sheridan added: “Where the Supreme Court has set for the law of our Nation, as a lower court, I am bound to follow it. ... This principle — combined with the reckless inaction of our governmental leaders to address the mass shooting tragedy afflicting our Nation — necessitates the Court’s decision.”

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/new-jersey-assault-rifle-ban-bcc4eddd3e2b216f6a9faad6c273be09

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Irish_Dem

(69,709 posts)
1. Our founding fathers wanted school children to be murdered with military weapons?
Thu Aug 1, 2024, 06:46 AM
Aug 2024

As the kids sit in their school rooms.

And grandma going to church?

sindri

(51 posts)
2. I wonder
Thu Aug 1, 2024, 07:43 AM
Aug 2024

if instead of bans we more effort on regulations - focus on requiring licensing that requires yearly training/testing or something like driving/hunting/fishing license but that would require more money to fund enforcement. I don't think we're ever going to get around the 2nd amendment rights unless we can get enough to amend the amendment.

BumRushDaShow

(152,671 posts)
4. "focus on requiring licensing that requires yearly training/testing"
Thu Aug 1, 2024, 08:31 AM
Aug 2024

States have tried that and immediately, the zealots sue. This is happening in Delaware right now -

Delaware gun control law faces legal challenge


By Christian Wade | The Center Square contributor May 17, 2024



(The Center Square) — Delaware gun owners will be required to get a firearm permit under a bill signed into law by Gov. John Carney that immediately drew a lawsuit from gun rights groups. The Democratic-led proposal, signed by Carney on Thursday, will require Delaware residents to obtain a permit to purchase a handgun after undergoing fingerprinting and a background check and completing an approved firearm training course.

Backers of the plan argue that it would reduce gun violence, suicides and homicides and crack down on illegal "straw purchases" of handguns on behalf of those prohibited by law from possessing them.

"We have banned assault weapons, bump stocks, and high-capacity magazines. We’ve passed red flag laws and prevented straw purchases," Carney said in remarks on Thursday. "And signing this piece of legislation is another important step forward to help keep our communities safe."

Shortly after Carney signed the legislation, a coalition of Second Amendment groups filed a lawsuit on behalf of five plaintiffs challenging the new law's constitutionality. The lawsuit, backed by the Delaware State Sportsmen's Association Inc. and Bridgeville Rifle and Pistol Club, argues that the fundamental civil rights of lawful gun owners in the First State are "being trampled on by overbearing legislation that defies controlling legal authority."

(snip)

https://www.thecentersquare.com/delaware/article_06e23020-146c-11ef-bbbb-675951f2a62c.html


In the above case, they don't even want an initial "training" course. A similar law was found "unconstitutional" in violation of the state Constitution in Oregon last year - https://www.police1.com/gun-legislation-law-enforcement/ore-gun-measure-requiring-background-check-safety-training-is-unconstitutional-judge-rules

This was despite a federal court earlier finding it okay - https://apnews.com/article/oregon-gun-control-law-ruling-da3778b8f6022c53a3cb940c4e4a6349

I expect those are all going up the judicial chain through appeals.

Lokee11

(348 posts)
8. I think you are right
Thu Aug 1, 2024, 11:11 AM
Aug 2024

Honestly it would be nice to just get an amendment to the amendment stating that the original and current ENTIRE Second Amendment must be considered and not ignored -

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

That bolded part seems pretty clear at least to me - and they have performed Gold Medal level mental gymnastics to just completely misinterpret / ignore it IMHO. So basically just need an amendment stating "READ THE ENTIRE 2ND AMENDMENT ASSHOLES!!!!"

I hate guns - have lost too many people to them, but have no problem with responsible gun ownership and most people are responsible. And hell if you want an AR-15 or some sort of other weapon of mass destruction, I am actually ok with that too. But just like if I had a funny car - I could drive it on the highway and would have to take it to a drag strip, I think you should have to take your AR-15 to a range or some designated place to use it. One should not be able to walk around with a loaded AR-15 or the like in public. The only reason that I can think of to have a weapon like that in public, is to either kill other people OR intimidate other people by making them think about the fact that you have a weapon that can kill them. As mentioned there should be required training and licensing that is periodically renewed, and there needs to be a national database that tracks ownership/registration of every weapon and the weapons unique serial number. Any gun found without a unique serial number should be considered contraband. Also, not sure how difficult or practical it would be but if possible, a "ballistic fingerprint" of every registered weapon should also be performed and placed into the database as well by the manufacturer. I do not know - but there has to be a better way.

FDT ✊!

groundloop

(12,914 posts)
7. Limit gun ownership to the same types of weapons available when 2A was written
Thu Aug 1, 2024, 10:02 AM
Aug 2024

Certainly our nations top politicians at the time could not have possibly had the technical crystal ball to envision the powerful killing machines available now. So, in my most humble opinion, we should maintain a strict interpretation of the 2nd Amendment to only include weapons that were available when it was written. (Oh yeah, there's also that little bit about well regulated militias that everyone tends to ignore).

maxsolomon

(36,552 posts)
9. Constitutional Absolutism
Fri Aug 2, 2024, 12:21 PM
Aug 2024

Frankly, it's amazing we don't have MORE gun violence considering the US is absolutely saturated with SA firearms.

Aristus

(69,967 posts)
10. School shooters not being able to kill more than 10 children before being required to re-load
Fri Aug 2, 2024, 02:31 PM
Aug 2024

is a staggering violation of the Constitutional rights of school shooters.

It's outrageous...



Bloody sarcasm emoji very much appropriate here.

FakeNoose

(37,364 posts)
11. What does the Constitution say about owning cellphones, or satellite televisions?
Fri Aug 2, 2024, 02:48 PM
Aug 2024

Oh that's right, such things hadn't been invented in 1789 when we ratified the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Nor did we have vaccinations, modern medicines, modern contraception, artificial hearts and kidneys, or combustion engine automobiles. I could go on - but you get it, we all do.

The Constitution is never going to be the final ruling for the way we live now, with the options we have available to us now. SCOTUS has gone off the deep end on "originalism" and it is affecting the judicial benches all the way down the line. Certain groups are using "originalism" because it bends the rules in their favor on certain subjects. Whenever it doesn't favor their side, originalism goes out the window.

Kid Berwyn

(20,376 posts)
12. "A machine gun you can walk around with."
Sat Aug 3, 2024, 10:14 AM
Aug 2024

What Al Capone thought about the Tommy Gun.

ETA: Remember the violin case?

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge says New Je...