Evangelicals Spending $1 Million to Help Kamala Harris Beat Donald Trump
Source: Newsweek
A group of evangelical Christians has reportedly spent over $1 million on an ad campaign to help Vice President Kamala Harris defeat former President Donald Trump in November's election.
While a majority of evangelicals have supported Trump's candidacy in the last two presidential elections, the group Evangelicals for Harris has this year been one of the most prominent Christian groups to advocate for the vice president, who is a Baptist.
The Christian Post reported on Thursday that the group's latest ad, which features footage of the late evangelical leader Billy Graham reading a Bible verse while juxtaposed with footage of Trump, was "an over $1 million ad campaign."
* * *
In the one-minute ad, Graham is shown reading a biblical warning to Christians that "men will become utterly self-centered and greedy for money" during the "last days," before a clip plays of Trump saying that he has been "greedy, greedy, greedy" for his "whole life."
Read more: https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-spending-1-million-help-kamala-harris-beat-donald-trump-1960661
Well, at least one group has seen the light.
3catwoman3
(25,430 posts)I do not get the appeal of Trump to people who consider themselves followers of the teaching of historical Jesus.
RealityCheque
(511 posts)Just finished reading; White Evangelical Racism: The Politics of...
by Anthea Butler
Jack Valentino
(1,325 posts)which leads me to question whether there was ever any sincerity in their purported religious beliefs whatsoever---
especially when they support Donald Trump, a man who is the antithesis to everything taught in the New Testament.
RealityCheque
(511 posts)The theology (sic) the white nationalist evangelicals surround themselves with, centers on picking selected scripture in dosages just enough that they can distort them to support that color and/or gender and/or ethnicity other that their own doesnt exist or matter. I wonder how many of these Christians realize (or accept) that Christ and His lineage were Jews, and yes, were people that were dark, not lily white!
UpInArms
(51,793 posts)RealityCheque
(511 posts)Thank you for raising the awareness again!
FakeNoose
(35,657 posts)Problem is ... they're surrounded by lots of dumb ones. They have to tread carefully.
The Roux Comes First
(1,561 posts)Oh please may it be so!
orleans
(34,941 posts)link from article
https://www.evangelicalsforharris.com/ads
StarryNite
(10,821 posts)We know they do it and usually in support of the right wing. But is it legal?
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office.
"The ban on political campaign activity by charities and churches was created by Congress more than a half century ago. The Internal Revenue Service administers the tax laws written by Congress and has enforcement authority over tax-exempt organizations. Here is some background information on the political campaign activity ban and the latest IRS enforcement statistics regarding its administration of this congressional ban.
In 1954, Congress approved an amendment by Sen. Lyndon Johnson to prohibit 501(c)(3) organizations, which includes charities and churches, from engaging in any political campaign activity. To the extent Congress has revisited the ban over the years, it has in fact strengthened the ban. The most recent change came in 1987 when Congress amended the language to clarify that the prohibition also applies to statements opposing candidates.
Currently, the law prohibits political campaign activity by charities and churches by defining a 501(c)(3) organization as one "which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office."
https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/charities-churches-and-politics
KS Toronado
(19,565 posts)to themselves is to hit them in the pocketbook. Take away their 501(c)(3) status and tax the Heaven
out of them. Make them understand separation of Church & State.
muriel_volestrangler
(102,473 posts)in an unlimited amount of lobbying, provided that the lobbying is related to
the organization's exempt purpose.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopicl03.pdf
Campaign, Planned Parenthood
Action Fund, and the National
Rifle Association are all
501(c)(4) organizations.
https://nlihc.org/sites/default/files/2014-conf-6c.pdf
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,872 posts)Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,872 posts)smart accountants.
RealityCheque
(511 posts)Absolutely correct. Its a cult just like Maga.
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,893 posts)Im sure there are none in Texas.
oasis
(51,703 posts)deplorable existence.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,899 posts)He's a sadist who gets off on causing others pain.
Witness the way he humiliated Zelensky after their meeting yesterday.