... and she's right. But he's done so much damage to our country that it hardly matters.

Wisconsin Democrats will GET OUT THE VOTE .

Come on Wisconsin, let's do this! Let's bring it in for Harris and Walz.

As most of us saw Liz Cheney‘s speech last night in Wisconsin, that was the chant that so many of the students there and others came up with. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinsinger are the two most courageous Republicans so far that have stood up for this fight against this deplorable person, every step of the way.

I have no doubt that both of them will be offered significant roles in the Harris administration, hopefully in her cabinet. In my mind, they are in the same category as Joe Biden. They are heroes for standing up when it counted to help us save our democracy. When ever any of those three are in a room, they should not be able to buy a beer ever.

She did a fabulous job summing up what happened Jan. 6, the threat to rule of law and constitution and why conservatives need to dump Drump ASAP. He is NOT a conservative nor a christian. He is a radical insurrectionist.

Liz Cheney makes it clear that she's not turning soft and liberal ... she's still a conservative on issues.

BUT she's complimentary and respectful towards the many Dems she worked with on the Jan. 6th committee, including Nancy Pelosi, Bennie Thompson, Jamie Raskin and several others. Until that point (the attempted coup on January 6) she hadn't met many Democrats because most of her work was with GOP members. That all changed when the 2nd impeachment flopped in the Senate, and when Kevin McCarthy withheld his support for the Joint Congressional Investigation.

Now that Cheney has come out and endorsed Kamala Harris (her Dad has too) it's even more amazing. It's not just a solid distrust for Chump ... she is philosophically opposed to everything he's doing and everything he says he will do if elected.

and this is a resurgence of the neo-cons or does she actually have a mind of her own?
On Consortium News, what I have read leans towards the former.

but more the "small government", "few regulations", "spread democracy", insult Democrats type.

It's a shame that the GOP has gotten so loony that people like her and Darth appear "liberal".

Remember that one of authors of Shrub & Darth's "torture memo" (John Yoo) is still around but now advising 45 and the rest of the current crazies in the GOP.

Government is only big for the purpose of helping people and the population is larger. That doesn't mean it is too big. If the methods from the fifties were still being used now govt would be huge.

As for regulations. The same principle. Just let the regulations do the job intended without getting special interests harm the public.

I had been through too many ridiculous attempts at them trying to do this before I retired and there is a refusal to understand that a "business" is not just providing "goods and services" but is also expected to "make a profit".

The government is NOT designed to "make a profit", so the whole idea of deploying a "business model" for the operation of the government, makes little sense.

One can use some applicable methods, practices, and tools to help improve efficiency, but at least for the federal government, civil servants take an oath to the U.S. Constitution, NOT the head of the business!





GSA SF-61 (the OATH)

She is a bit of a puzzle.

She helped pass almost every Trump bill, or appointment, etc. while the Orange Fuher was in office.

She seemed to be a strict abortion opponent. She may even be privately in favour of a nationwide ban.

She was against leaving Afghanistan. She's always supported her father's admin's decision to invade Iraq. A total war hawk.

On the other hand,
She has a fierce commitment to the Constitution and the system of Democracy for the USA. And recognizes the danger that Trump's MAGA cult represents. To the point that she was willing to be ostrizised by her own party.

She was a staunch opponent of gay marriage, even after her sister came out But she has since reversed her opinion, and now is okay with it.

And of course she valiantly led the Congressional investigation into the January 6th riot.

I would say based on those points she definitely has a mind of her own. But it is still a very conservative mind.

One line that stood out in her speech to that gathering of mostly Democrats was, paraphrasing:
"I believe that the family knows best not the government"
That belief could be parsed to be interpreted in a few different extremes. Anti public schooling, anti regulation, pro corporate.
Different that a liberal point of view, who'd say that sometimes the family guardians are the problem...or that you need regulations to curb things like climate change, and that corporations need to be held to anti-trust laws etc.

I also think, if Harris manages to sweep the WH, Congress, and the Senate, she will feel almost obligated to start criticizing her again. Especially if she wants to be a part of a newly rebuilt Republican Party.

matter to me one way or another. What she believed prior to Jan.6, what she believes now, how she evolves over the next few years (or not) can be entirely different things. Can I reserve judgement and get back to you in a few years? Please do not mistake this for any sort of approval or liking of Neo-cons!! Did you listen to her speech? I can't imagine the pre-Dump neo-con saying anything resembling that. No matter which way the election goes there is bound to be some massive reconfiguration of Repub party so I will reserve judgement. In today's topsy turvy world the Dem Party can now be considered "conservative " in the true sense of the word, while the Maga Party is RADICAL INSURRECTIONIST.

I listened to Vance talk about how Trump and him were going to stand up for the working class and reduce middle-class taxes.
And I also remember the whole Neo-con crew lie us into destabilizing the entire Middle East that probably had something to do with the current conflict in Israel.
But you are right, the next few years will be interesting. I have read some who fear a 1 party system, but while I was reading your comments, I'm starting to wonder if it will fragment both parties. Who knows?

and attracts more who are on the side of democracy/rule of law/ antiauthoritianism but are not liberal or progressive. I know we're not supposed to compare Drump to Hitler (AND indeed he prob more closely resembles some of the south american dictators who had their enemies "disappeared" ) but the way that Anti-fascist allies overlooked pretty significant differences and came together to fight common enemy is certainly relevant!