Democrats try 'Trump-proofing' their states ahead of Election Day
Source: Washington Post
October 6, 2024 at 6:00 a.m. EDT
Washington and Massachusetts are stockpiling abortion pills. California is cutting climate deals directly with automakers. Colorado is rushing to protect the right to same-sex marriage. And attorneys general across the country are marshaling legal resources and privately plotting courtroom strategies.
From the West Coast to the East, blue states are preparing for the possibility that former president Donald Trump wins reelection in November by attempting to shield their policy priorities from the reach of a future Trump administration.
This preemptive strategy Trump-proofing encompasses a wide range of issues and programs that Democratic leaders fear could be targeted in another Trump presidency, based on his previous actions and his current campaign promises.
Even as they pursue such safeguards, Democrats are projecting confidence in their nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, but they say it would be irresponsible to go into Election Day without a backup plan for their worst-case scenario.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/10/06/democratic-states-trump-election-day-2024/
No paywall (gift)
SupportSanity
(1,154 posts)Aristus
(68,432 posts)Thats what you wanted, isnt it?
bucolic_frolic
(47,130 posts)He will attempt to rule by decree. Explain to me the mechanism to resist that. Slow courts? He's had a window to SCOTUS many times, on the fly.
BumRushDaShow
(142,937 posts)recognized "states rights". That is an old concept fully embraced by the racist, RWers, that was added to the Constitution as a catch-all, and is what fueled overturning Roe, and other things.
The assumption has been that as long as the GOP controls a majority of states, they can continue to go with "states rights" to enforce their draconian agendas.
prodigitalson
(2,884 posts)when the state legalizes gay marriage, they want a national "marriage protection act" and when local entities like municipalities want to protect trans people, they want the state to intervene with bathroom bills.
so if the state is doing something racist like segregation they are for state's rights but if a state wants to do something humane like enforce women's reproductive rights or legalize weed they want a national abortion ban and federal drug prohibition.
I'll admit they have gotten a bit better on the weed thing (just because enough of them smoke pot, which is weird they are so uptight) but have become way more reactionary on everything else.
Shermann
(8,681 posts)BumRushDaShow
(142,937 posts)which is why, for example, you see some that participated in the "Medicaid Expansion", and others did not. States also regulate their "marketplaces".
"States Rights".
Shermann
(8,681 posts)Cue "Going to California" by Led Zeppelin.
BumRushDaShow
(142,937 posts)then it's a possibility, although the insurance lobby is too powerful to exit your state entirely (even with it being SC).
Bayard
(24,145 posts)States rights won't mean a damn, nor will any other kind of rights.