Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(115,244 posts)
Mon Oct 7, 2024, 07:18 PM Oct 7

Supreme Court rejects case about DOJ investigating parents who protest at school boards

Source: USA Today

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court refused on Monday to hear a case from parents in Virginia and Michigan who argued the Justice Department targeted them for protesting at school board meetings.

At the heart of the dispute was a 2021 memo Attorney General Merrick Garland aimed at combatting “a disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation and threats of violence against school administrators, board members, teachers and staff.” The memo setting up meetings with state and local law enforcement agencies sought to “discourage these threats, identify them when they occur and prosecute them when appropriate.”

Some parents in Loudoun County, Virginia, and Saline, Michigan, challenged the policy in federal court by arguing it targeted them for protesting school policies under their First Amendment rights. But judges on the District and Circuit Courts rejected their arguments.

Now the Supreme Court has refused to hear the case.

Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-rejects-case-doj-133957192.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court rejects case about DOJ investigating parents who protest at school boards (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 7 OP
So, this is a sane decision wolfie001 Oct 7 #1
GOOD! ShazzieB Oct 7 #2
Could these people slightlv Oct 7 #3
More, they looked at this SCOTUS and thought they could win! Grins Oct 7 #4
As usual, there seems to be a difference of definition here... OldBaldy1701E Oct 8 #5

wolfie001

(3,627 posts)
1. So, this is a sane decision
Mon Oct 7, 2024, 07:41 PM
Oct 7

A guess they're throwing us a bone after totally fucking up the Texas Abortion case. Got it.

ShazzieB

(18,641 posts)
2. GOOD!
Mon Oct 7, 2024, 08:15 PM
Oct 7

Like a blind pig finding a truffle once in a while, the SCOTUS is still capable of getting it right on occasion!

slightlv

(4,325 posts)
3. Could these people
Mon Oct 7, 2024, 09:10 PM
Oct 7

be anymore paranoid? I swear, they're the biggest snowflakes in the world! I do hope, when all this is said and done, they find out what it means to actually be persecuted. Right now, they have no idea what the word means, let alone how it feels!

Grins

(7,883 posts)
4. More, they looked at this SCOTUS and thought they could win!
Mon Oct 7, 2024, 10:03 PM
Oct 7

And given the court I would have agreed with them.

OldBaldy1701E

(6,338 posts)
5. As usual, there seems to be a difference of definition here...
Tue Oct 8, 2024, 07:00 AM
Oct 8

Excuse me, parents, but there is a major difference between protesting and harassment, intimidation, threats, and attempted violence.

Maybe they were not aware of this distinction?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rejects cas...