Scoop: Massive Harris ad buy launches wild spending month
Source: Axios
7 hours ago
A massive $50 million ad buy from Vice President Harris' outside super PAC signaled the beginning of a spending rush by both campaigns to empty their war chests in the election's final month.
Why it matters: Both Democrats and Republicans are unleashing more financial political fire in just seven swing states than America has ever seen.
The Harris campaign and its super PACs are swimming in cash. Their challenge will be to spend it efficiently and effectively. For Harris super PAC Future Forward this week, that involves directly appealing to the kind of voter Harris has struggled to attract: white working-class males. "Trump is fighting for rich guys like himself," says a goateed welder in the new ad, before the screen flashes to a quick shot of Elon Musk. "Kamala is fighting for us."
Zoom in: In the handful of states that will determine the election, political ads on local TV stations are at near saturation levels.
But for campaigns and PACs flush with cash, there's an October hack: Reserve on national cable and just accept that the majority of your viewers aren't your target audience. Go national to win local. In this buy, Future Forward is placing $10 million on national TV and another $10 million on YouTube. This week's $50 million buy from Future Forward is part of a campaign that it expects to exceed $350 million. More than $100 million is out the door, according to AdImpact.
Zoom out: In the presidential campaign and in House races, Democrats are pressing their money advantage over Republicans.
In the first week of October, Democrats have spent some $93 million on the presidential campaign, compared to $54 million by Republicans, according to AdImpact.
Read more: https://www.axios.com/2024/10/08/kamala-harris-trump-election-campaign-spending
CrispyQ
(38,240 posts)The best democracy money can buy. That bumper sticker applies even more today than when it came out sometime in the 90s. I wonder how much money is spent in one presidential election cycle? Our electoral process is a for-profit industry now & the players who can change it are some of the ones who benefit from it.
Bayard
(24,145 posts)Too much emphasis on who can raise more money. I'm really hoping she's sharing some with the down ballot candidates though.
CrispyQ
(38,240 posts)She's going to need the senate if she really wants to get anything done.
EYESORE 9001
(27,514 posts)Cant believe the number of Harris campaign ads that get played. Frequently, I might add. The ads are great, but it would be even better if they got heard on other outlets as well, say, where the wankers tune in.
BumRushDaShow
(142,231 posts)Literally a pile of them (I have SiriusXM too so I already expected them to be there anyway).
PatrickforB
(15,109 posts)is brilliant and disciplined. She'll make a heck of a president!