MSNBC delays documentary over fears it could 'offend Donald Trump': report
Source: raw story
Kathleen Culliton October 8, 2024 2:19
A documentary about the Trump administration's family separation policy will not air before Election Day because MSNBC is concerned about offending the Republican presidential nominee, according to new reports.
Journalist Oliver Darcy, a former critic for CNN, revealed Tuesday that the Errol Morris documentary based on Jacob Soboroff's 2020 book "Separated: Inside an American Tragedy," is being held by NBC bosses until Dec. 7 a move that apparently annoyed the director.
......................
..........................
"Not only does NBCU have a potential Oscars contender on its hands with the child separation documentary," he wrote, "but Rachel Maddow has offered to do an hour-long special hyping the film ahead of its network debut, Im told.
........................
"On Mondays edition of his Status newsletter, he reported that Rebecca Blumenstein, president of editorial for NBC News, opposed airing 'Separated' before the election because the network still hopes Trump will agree to another presidential debate," the outlet reported.................
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-msnbc-documentary/
damn. I would expect something like this from Fox and RW media but not from msnbc.
?id=53727577&width=2400&height=1599
Republican presidential nominee and former U.S. President Donald Trump gestures during his rally in Saginaw, Michigan, U.S., October 3, 2024. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY
Prairie Gates
(3,827 posts)Why else worry about offending him?
CrispyQ
(38,897 posts)As if that's gonna happen.
onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(4,779 posts)are counting on it.
angrychair
(10,046 posts)Like any legacy news organization. Misery and suffering sells more news that happiness and prosperity. (I mean watch the breathless coverage of the Hurricanes. They all sound down right giddy at the prospect of death and destruction)
MSNBC and the rest of them would be happier than any Republican if he won.
MacKasey
(1,287 posts)Pachamama
(17,127 posts)This is really pissing me off. The public has a right to know and they are not doing their job as journalists.
eppur_se_muova
(38,015 posts)FredGarvin
(599 posts)eppur_se_muova
(38,015 posts)BoRaGard
(3,746 posts)How gutless of MSNBC.
Kid Berwyn
(18,938 posts)Part of ABCNNBCBSFUXNoiseNutworks, Corporate McPravdas allegiance is to the almighty dollar. They laugh at the First Amendment.
Magoo48
(5,767 posts)They are now so blatant, it is a daily insult.
How do I know, I listen to you guys here on DU and elsewhere.
I tuned out 20 years ago. I will not support their survival.
Kid Berwyn
(18,938 posts)The thing would be supported by taxpayers and be autonomous from Uncle Sam.
It's only job: to do what the Founders understood a democratic republic needs to survive: A Free Press. The "press" is the only business mentioned by named in the entire Constitution of the United States.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
Perhaps We could create something like the BBC. Publicly funded, it just operates to get the facts out in front of the People. The Who, What, Where, When, Why, How and anything else that matters.
As you know, Magoo48, We the People must have access to a free press -- one free to Find out. Free to Report. Free to Analyze. Free to Share. Otherwise, the liars will continue to get ahead, wars will continue uninterrupted, and the rich will continue to get richer at the expense of most everyone else.
Magoo48
(5,767 posts)I suppose if we could make it public funded and pay the journalists well, it might work. Wed have to keep it untainted by government, private, and corporate interests. It probably require some sort of public oversight, being careful not to let outside influences pollute the journalism like it has school boards.
The more you think about it, its damn hard to protect journalistic integrity.
C_U_L8R
(45,959 posts)What happened to you, Journalism?
FredGarvin
(599 posts)'nuff said
LuvLoogie
(7,687 posts)Owens
(383 posts)They would air it pronto!
kacekwl
(7,820 posts)slightlv
(4,677 posts)Initech
(103,171 posts)Well too fucking bad!
moniss
(6,401 posts)vapor2
(1,715 posts)TO offend an ex prez who tried to overthrow our govt? sent covid equipment to Putin? keeps whining that Fema $$ is going to immigrants?
SERIOUSLY?
Susan Calvin
(2,181 posts)Don't forget that they're all in this to make a profit. They have different viewpoints and different degrees of veracity, but the bottom line is profit. Thanks Reagan.
IcyPeas
(23,065 posts)SMH
NotHardly
(1,541 posts)jalan48
(14,621 posts)Quanto Magnus
(1,054 posts)They're definitely wealthy and are ostensibly protecting their money by protecting tRump. The execs will definitely benefit from a tRump tax cut package.
Evolve Dammit
(19,639 posts)Luck Counts
(40 posts)Think. Again.
(20,913 posts)...Rebecca Blumenstein, president of editorial for NBC News, is taking david pecker's National Enquirer place as trump's "Catch & Kill" specialist.
FakeNoose
(36,421 posts)They're the ones who created the product, am I right? They should be able to broadcast it however they choose.
Paladin
(29,271 posts)bucolic_frolic
(48,279 posts)woodsprite
(12,294 posts)Joinfortmill
(17,015 posts)hadEnuf
(2,917 posts)Otherwise, why make the frigging documentary in the first place?
This reeks of corporate and political interference.
ArkansasDemocrat1
(3,213 posts)Keep hanging around and you'll be tainted
Ohioboy
(3,557 posts)If they are afraid to air the truth now what's it going to be like if Trump gets back in power.
It's pretty bad when congress, the Supreme Court, and the media act as though we are already under dictatorship?
SeattleVet
(5,625 posts)Blue Owl
(55,125 posts)dchill
(41,045 posts)mdbl
(5,586 posts)Another reason not to watch it.
DFW
(57,067 posts)The one that WOULD get Trump to do another debate (about $2 billion into his private account) is not something NBC would offer in the first place.
JustAnotherGen
(34,171 posts)Not everyone has.
What the 45 Admin did was a test for what they will do if 45 gets back into the WH
ShazzieB
(19,183 posts)Raw Story geadljned this story incorrectly, imo. Based on the following excerpts from the article, it sounds to me like it's the bosses at NBC who want to hold this back, not MSNBC.
*snip*
Darcy also reported NBC bosses "dont want to offend Donald Trump, according to the Wrap.
"On Mondays edition of his Status newsletter, he reported that Rebecca Blumenstein, president of editorial for NBC News, opposed airing 'Separated' before the election because the network still hopes Trump will agree to another presidential debate," the outlet reported.
MSNBC and NBC are separate entities,, both of which are the part of NBCUniversal News Group, owned by Comcast. I'm not clear on the exact relationship between the two or how much control the head honchos at NBC have over MSNBC's programming decisions, but they obviously have some, and it seems clear to me that the objections to airing this documentary are coming from NBC executives, not MSNBC, as the headline implies.
After reading all the replies accusing MSNBC of selling out or some such thing, I felt this was worth pointing out. I believe we need to put the blame where it belongs: with NBC, not MSNBC!
I also don't think we've heard the last word on this controversy. Now that Darcy has gone public with this, the parties involved will no doubt make their own positions clear. I'll be very surprised if there isn't mention of this on some of the MSNBC shows tonight. And who knows, if enough pressure is put on NBC, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of MSNBC being allowed to air the documentary prior to the election.
As Rachel Maddow always says, "Watch this space!"
riversedge
(74,024 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(157,226 posts)This is a bad move by MSNBC
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,907 posts)HE WILL MAKE STUFF UP!!!!
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,907 posts)Teacher of the Year
(172 posts)Um... yeah, NBC, why not say you aren't going to air it until you know he has lost? We all know you won't air it in Dec if he wins. You might offend him.
JT45242
(3,077 posts)I don't know how that kind of you tube sir. We must have been hacked
dem4decades
(12,160 posts)HariSeldon
(514 posts)They are dogs, very well-paid dogs!
Eko
(8,794 posts)Here is what I sent them.
Hi, I heard that this doc wouldn't be aired before the election. If this is true then I think that should be rethought. I've been a daily watcher of MSNBC for a long time now and I would be very upset it that is the case. Not doing so, withholding information in a presidential election if it is factual is a very bad thing. Sometimes you have to do what is right for the country even if you have to take some flak that will blow over anyways. It's not like the republican party is going to stop thinking MSNBC is fake news if you dont.