Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(142,269 posts)
Thu Oct 24, 2024, 07:48 PM Oct 24

Trump moves to dismiss Jan. 6 indictment and stop 'private-citizen Smith' from spending money

Source: Law & Crime

Oct 24th, 2024, 7:54 pm


Attorneys for former President Donald Trump on Thursday moved to dismiss the Jan. 6 case on the basis that special counsel Jack Smith was unlawfully appointed and has unlawfully spent tens of millions of dollars “on his unjust and unwarranted prosecutions.”

The 30-page proposed motion to dismiss and for injunctive relief is premised on arguments that previously held the day in the Southern District of Florida. Namely, Trump’s attorneys argue the prosecutor in charge of the case was given his authority in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s appointments and appropriations clauses.

While those arguments did prove successful in one courtroom, in the Mar-a-Lago documents case, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has, so far, appeared disdainful of the idea that U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s summer decision might be cited as controlling precedent.

That’s no problem for the 45th president — his latest motion largely relies on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/unjust-case-was-dead-on-arrival-trump-moves-to-dismiss-jan-6-indictment-and-stop-private-citizen-smith-from-spending-money-with-clarence-thomas-leading-the-way/



Full headline: ‘Unjust case was dead on arrival’: Trump moves to dismiss Jan. 6 indictment and stop ‘private-citizen Smith’ from spending money — with Clarence Thomas leading the way

Link to MOTION (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.270.0_1.pdf
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

BOSSHOG

(39,836 posts)
1. IOW Jack Smith knows stuff, can prove stuff, got the goods
Thu Oct 24, 2024, 07:53 PM
Oct 24

If trump is innocent wouldn’t it be satisfying to prove it in court?

As Hitler said in the 1930s, I do not want the legislators, I want the judiciary. As trump wanted the likes of the corrupt freedom hating scum he appointed.

Hermit-The-Prog

(36,587 posts)
2. I have a dream that one day traitortrump and his loose cannon will be bound by law.
Thu Oct 24, 2024, 08:01 PM
Oct 24

Let them be bound so tightly that even the Subversive Court will be ashamed to intervene.

LetMyPeopleVote

(154,456 posts)
3. The DC circuit has ruled on this theory
Thu Oct 24, 2024, 08:12 PM
Oct 24

There is binding precedent on this theory in the DC circuit that is binding on Judge Chutkan. The 11th circuit has this issue before it in Mar-a-Lago case. I doubt that the 11th circuit will affirm Judge Loose Cannon’s crappy opinion in the Mar-a-Lago case

LudwigPastorius

(10,790 posts)
9. How many tens of millions have the taxpayers spent on protecting private citizen Trump?
Thu Oct 24, 2024, 11:45 PM
Oct 24

I'd bet it's a fuck of a lot more than it costs for an independent prosecutor to pursue a dangerous criminal.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump moves to dismiss Ja...