They have a summary here - https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/rnc-asks-scotus-to-disqualify-certain-provisional-ballots-in-pennsylvania/

Their main site is here - https://www.democracydocket.com/

But note that most of these cases are initially litigated by long-time voting rights orgs (who have been around long before Elias formed his group), but his group will provide material assistance when needed/asked for, including taking the lead.

...I guess their role is to stir up the followers?

AP - https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-pennsylvania-provisional-ballots-e72618cfa6bfd6c254015967451e442a
CBS - https://www.cbsnews.com/news/republicans-supreme-court-pennsylvania-provisional-ballots/
CNN - https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/28/politics/naked-ballot-voting-supreme-court-pennsylvania/index.html
VOX - https://www.vox.com/scotus/380170/supreme-court-pennsylvania-election-republican-genser
Spotlight PA - https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2024/10/pennsylvania-provisional-ballots-mail-rejected-scotus-appeal/
Pennsylvania Capital-Star - https://penncapital-star.com/election-2024/gop-asks-scotus-to-halt-pennsylvania-supreme-court-ruling-in-butler-county-provisional-ballots-case/

Maybe "the stirring" is from within?

...the source for your OP is newsweek, just as I wrote in my reply.

Some were not available at post time and others were outside of LBN criteria timeframes. So not much of an argument that you have there.

There is nothing exclusive about what they wrote that is different from the other sources.

The one thing about the center-right leaning sites like Politico, The Hill, Newsweek, or a site like Roll Call, etc., is that they are actually pretty much POLITICAL stories "only" sites vs the rest that use up 1/2 of their webpages covering Travis Kelsey/Taylor Swift nonsense, "Lifestyle", "Cooking", "Sports", "Entertainment", "Business", "Real Estate", etc.

That requires having to comb through dozens and dozens of links (even when you pick their "political' category, where they'll still mange to stick some "entertainer" story in there like what has been happening with Alec Baldwin and "Rust" ), to actually find something that fits LBN criteria.

"right wing sources" like "Fox News", "OAN", "InfoWars", "Townhall", "Breitbart", "Blaze", "Washington Times", "The Telegraph", "The New York Post", "Washington Free Beacon", etc.

One needs to understand the difference because you could easily lump CNN (or most of the rest) into the pile of "rightwing" given their owners, .

...who claimed to be very Dem Party-active, argued with me about how trustworthy and high-quality the NY Post is!

Oh, good times.

from the NY Post or Faux. But the TOS has provisions -

When people post "X"s from a Democrat or progressive that is a reply to a RW loon source whose comment is embedded in that "X", that is the type of thing where you have those sources end up here, but they are being pointed to, laughed at, and ridiculed for context purposes.

In the case of those "center-right" sources like Politico (where a DUer's daughter is a reporter), The Hill, Newsweek, WSJ, etc., they haven't gone completely loon (although we know the WSJ is owned by Murdoch but still gets cited here). And because they are narrowly focused on "politics", they are actually getting stories out that the other sites aren't reporting on or will maybe get around to a few days from now, because the latter are covering so many other topics and often try to tie in some "entertainment" nonsense to them for more clicks.

...that someone is posting just to spread rightwing crap but then they try to excuse it by saying "know your enemy!" or "Oppo Research!", or some other weak reason.

But obviously, these people are so afraid of losing they'll try anything to disenfranchise voters.

Not having a secrecy envelope does not change the marked ballot. That's as simple as it is.

If we had an ethical SCOTUS, they wouldn't take the case. But all bets are off with corrupt Alito and corrupt Thomas, who make no effort to hide their political biases.