Are we looking at them?

her part in the case? Fuck that magat.

This guy is accused of trying to kill tsf.

The appeal should be interesting.

the appeal is all but guaranteed with this decision by Cannon, especially if she's not disciplined or removed from the Docs case by the Circuit...

The better view, imo, and the one taken in a growing number of courts, is to allow an "interlocutory" appeal before final judgment where the issue is whether a judge should have granted a motion to recuse before the trial began. I haven't found an 11th circuit case addressing this question.

I sure as hell didn’t.

How could she defend the victim if she were to step aside?
(Do I need a sarcasm emoji there?)

The guy has no case. Any judge will do a good job and he will be convicted on the evidence.

She could have taken the high ground and said she was avoiding even the appearance of a conflict. That would have helped with the doc case appeal where they might very well take it away from her.

Just stupid. She has to see tsf is losing and she will never be ag.

There must be something on this MAGA robot enough to get rid of her.

"Nor am I concerned about the political consequences of my rulings or how those rulings might be viewed by 'some in the media.'"

Judge Tanya Chutkan on the other hand…

Looks like a federal appeals court will have to show her what it means.

She runs towards them, not away

goal for her is the Supreme Court. Another sycophant for the felon.

when she and the 6 facist enablers on the SC are allowed to enable the tsf and his followers to do anything they want? Refuse to follow any norms themselves? I know this is a separate case from the documents one, but it just proves they don't even have the common decency or morals to remove themselves from cases where their conflict of interest is clear.