Water activists 'concerned' but will keep fighting 'forever chemicals' as Trump returns
Source: USA Today
Published 5:14 a.m. ET Nov. 8, 2024 | Updated 11:09 a.m. ET Nov. 8, 2024
Many Americans remember April 8 this year for the once-in-a-lifetime eclipse that swept across the country, but for Tony Spaniola, the true generational milestone came two days later. On April 10, Spaniola stood among a handful of fellow activists in an ornate White House office, jubilantly glued to a television screen showing officials from the Environmental Protection Agency announcing the first-ever limits on so-called forever chemicals in drinking water.
It was truly like an out-of-body experience, like I cannot believe, the clean water advocate remembered thinking. A few years ago, I couldn't get anybody to talk to me. But now, here I am in the White House watching this. It's really happening, said Spaniola, a 66-year-old attorney from suburban Detroit.
Dozens of citizen action groups have sprouted up near military bases, chemical plants and other sites where PFAS, or per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, have been released into the environment. These toxic, human-made chemicals dont break down easily in nature or in human bodies, with some linked to increased risks for cancer and other serious health problems.
The EPAs announcement of limits this spring marked a turning point for many of these PFAS activists, Spaniola said. But some, including Spaniola, now worry about potential rollbacks in PFAS monitoring and regulation under President-elect Donald Trumps incoming administration, citing a lack of urgency and the suppression of a PFAS health study during Trumps first term.
Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/investigations/2024/11/08/water-activists-worried-about-trump-presidency/76110402007/
Klarkashton
(2,063 posts)Problems. He is a worthless dangerous self promoting asshole dimwit.
Martin68
(24,597 posts)job cleaning up our waterways and trying to protect them, but whenever a Republican is in office, regulations are diluted or removed and we lose some of the progress we've made instead of continually upgrading our approach. It is an ongoing battle, but one worth fighting.
LT Barclay
(2,734 posts)And that would be in addition to the difficulty in putting the laws back the way they were in today's political environment. I remember how distressed some of the EPA and NOAA folks were when Bush was taking things apart.
We are in a slow retreat on environmental regulations anyway and thanks to a bunch of partisan hacks masquerading as judges on the SCOTUS, even the courts aren't any help.