The public has a right to know.

... make all those inflammatory accusations of alleged pedophilia, drunken, druged up, pornographic videos of minors, paying minors for sex, crossing state lines for prostitution, and contributing to the delinquency of minors - all just POOF go away.

We won’t release the report because He’s no longer in congress. He’s no longer in congress because he’s been nominated to be the countries number one prosecutor so there’s that reason for not releasing the damaging report. We wouldn’t want America to know. And besides trump supporters don’t care of his “indiscretions” so there’s that.

Christian leadership in the house. So comforting.

The people payed for the investigation and he has been nominated to a high ranking position in the federal government. The fact that he was even under investigation by the house it concerning enough.

Yeah, some democrat stroll to the podium and pass out copies. Per rule, they can’t act on it. So be it. Don’t act on it, share it. Silly question. Why would republicans not want the info made public? Gosh Johnson two months before he gets inaugurated and he’s already clogging up your septic tank.

Rules don't matter to them. Why do they only matter to Dems?

Just like Biden giving Trump office space and calling him on his win. Meanwhile Trump after 2020 loss...well,everyone already knows how that went down.

I wouldn't have given that POS fascist an inch of office space nor would I have called him congratulating him on his win.

If he was under investigation by the House the public has the right to know the findings of the investigation, even more so now that he has been nominated for attorney general. If republicans refuse to release it and it is leaked I'm sure it would look bad for Matt Gaetz and republicans for trying to withhold it. The smart move would be for republicans to just release it.

means Gaetz is compromised, because he could be manipulated by someone with the means to leak it.

This is now a national security issue. Release the report.

Read something into the records on the House floor. Is this something that a Democrat on that panel read into record on the house floor?

but what would probably happen is a motion to have what was read "stricken from the record".

Does “stricken from the record” mean much if it is read aloud live on C-SPAN? Or heard by some reporter in attendance? At that point it is out there, which always seems to be the real point when someone does that. If so, maybe we will see more of that?

I don’t know the procedurals at all. Just asking as I am clinging to straws of hope to keep from drowning in a pool of tears…

People could record it themselves but in the "official Congressional Record", it would be removed, and I expect CSPAN, which is controlled by Congress, would probably have them remove the portions that they recorded for their archive.

Even if it was stricken from the record, I'm thinking news media would have full access to (while it's read on the floor) it BEFORE it was stricken?

but then they seem to like to "selectively" enforce the First Amendment so who knows what draconian thing they might try to implement to wipe it from history and "threaten" the media and public about any "copies" they have!