Senate Judiciary Democrats Request FBI File On Matt Gaetz
Source: Huff Post
Nov 20, 2024, 03:09 PM EST
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee asked the FBI on Wednesday to hand over the complete evidentiary file on attorney general nominee Matt Gaetz, whos been accused of sex trafficking a minor, illicit drug use and other crimes.
The letter, signed by 10 lawmakers, asks FBI Director Christopher Wray to provide the committee with the file from the agencys past investigation into the former Florida congressman so that they may fulfill their constitutional duty to vet President-elect Donald Trumps pick for the countrys highest law enforcement position.
The grave public allegations against Mr. Gaetz speak directly to his fitness to serve as the chief law enforcement officer for the federal government, the letter says. The unanswered questions regarding Mr. Gaetzs alleged conduct are particularly significant given that his associate, Joel Greenberg, pleaded guilty to the sex trafficking charge for which Mr. Gaetz was also investigated.
The Department of Justice, which oversees the FBI, ended its probe into Gaetz last year without filing charges. The investigation reportedly stalled because of concerns about the credibility of two key witnesses. Gaetz has denied the allegations against him. The letters signatories argue that there is substantial precedent for the FBI providing lawmakers with materials concerning both open and closed investigations, including testimony and memos. They cited eight examples.
Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/matt-gaetz-fbi-file_n_673e24cee4b0f17b35e0a204
Link to tweet
@JudiciaryDems
·
Follow
The FBI should turn over the complete files of its investigation into Matt Gaetz.
Image
Image
Image
Image
12:35 PM · Nov 20, 2024
truthisfreedom
(23,316 posts)This will be fun.
Igel
(36,082 posts)Apparently Greenberg was also found guilty of falsely accusing a politician of having underaged sex with a girl. And word is he's one of the witnesses that's being cited making the same accusation against Trump.
I have a good imagination so I could imagine a worse witness. On the other hand, I can't imagine a jury thinking that was an even plausibly plausible witness in any even marginally fair universe.