Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(169,137 posts)
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:15 AM Jan 2025

Justice Department says it plans to release only part of special counsel's Trump report for now

Source: AP

Updated 10:15 AM EST, January 8, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Justice Department said Wednesday that it will release special counsel Jack Smith's findings on Donald Trump's efforts to undo the results of the 2020 presidential election but will keep under wraps for now the rest of the record focused on the president-elect's hoarding of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate.

The revelation was made in a filing to a federal appeals court that was considering a defense request to block the release of the two-volume report while charges remain pending against two Trump co-defendants in the Florida case accusing the Republican former president and current president-elect of illegally holding classified documents. Aileen Cannon, the Trump-appointed judge presiding over the classified documents case, granted the request Tuesday, issuing a temporary block on the report.

The Justice Department said it would proceed with plans to release the first of two volumes centered on the election interference case but would make the classified documents section of the report available only to the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees for their private review as long as the case against Trump's co-defendants is ongoing.

"This limited disclosure will further the public interest in keeping congressional leadership apprised of a significant matter within the Department while safeguarding defendants' interests," the filing said.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/trump-jack-smith-jan-6-c788ac8bd4c5b4c4add2338d692d45e0



NOTE THE UPDATE: THE CLASSIFIED STUFF IS GOING TO BE RELEASED TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE LEADERSHIP

Article updated.

Original article -

Updated 10:03 AM EST, January 8, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Justice Department says it will release special counsel Jack Smith's findings on Donald Trump's efforts to undo the results of the 2020 presidential election but will keep the rest of the report under wraps for now.

The revelation was made in a filing Wednesday to a federal appeals court that was considering a defense request to block the release of the two-volume report while charges remain pending against two Trump co-defendants in a case accusing the Republican former president and president-elect of illegally hoarding classified documents.

68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Department says it plans to release only part of special counsel's Trump report for now (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 OP
Goddamn it, Garland. Release the whole fucking report. dalton99a Jan 2025 #1
There is a court order holding back the second volume. That it is bogus doesn't mean it must not be respected Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #3
Why should claudette Jan 2025 #8
Because it is a court order. People like Giuliani don't respect them, but law abiding citizens do Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #12
Exactly Unladen Swallow Jan 2025 #27
That's the problem, Democrats obey the rules and then take it up the nose when the pukes don't. dem4decades Jan 2025 #54
Too late.! By the time "a court" reverses it... Grins Jan 2025 #61
But if the claudette Jan 2025 #29
The order is not fake or counterfeit. It is based on bogus reasoning (in my view) & I think it will be overruled Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #30
Because it is a court order endgenocide Jan 2025 #32
Have you looked at the updated AP article in OP? BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #33
In simpler terms DENVERPOPS Jan 2025 #66
Because prison time is unappealing? FBaggins Jan 2025 #36
Respected ? Why kacekwl Jan 2025 #34
Easy for you to ask someone to take the federal penitentiary chip for your impatience Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #35
Biden can release the report anytime SurfLiberal Jan 2025 #38
Certainly it is a matter kacekwl Jan 2025 #45
Can't let the poors know the lies & corruption they live under NotHardly Jan 2025 #57
He'll need to ponder that... Gnomad Jan 2025 #59
Garland is SPINELESS Owens Jan 2025 #2
The second volume release is out of his hands for a few days at least Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #5
"..safeguarding defendants' interest..." DV1 Jan 2025 #4
On one hand we have someone who tried to end democracy. LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jan 2025 #48
No evidence is being thrown out. thesquanderer Jan 2025 #65
That's a shame claudette Jan 2025 #6
It is the Injustice Dept. Irish_Dem Jan 2025 #7
I shudder to think what Gym-Rat Jordan will do with it..... lastlib Jan 2025 #9
Gym Jordan is in the House, this will be released to Senate Judiciary Gnomad Jan 2025 #49
aw sh*t, forgot about new Congress..... lastlib Jan 2025 #60
My bad... Gnomad Jan 2025 #62
Garland is a shit. .... covering up Trump's crimes just like Bill Barr. Botany Jan 2025 #10
This is an Ellsberg moment. FalloutShelter Jan 2025 #11
Wait a few days. Fair chance the 11th Circuit will overrule Cannon, again. They might even reinstate the case. . .nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #14
That would be great. FalloutShelter Jan 2025 #15
No, waiting has been our mistake all along. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #16
Easy for you to say someone should risk years in federal penitentiary because you can't wait a brief time. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #20
I have no idea what you're talking about. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #22
Leaking documents can be a Federal crime. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #23
That's weird, I didn't say anything about leaking documents. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #24
Daniel Ellsberg is topic of this subthread, which is what was in mind. He was charged w 115 years, but not convicted. nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #25
cool, I was responding to your suggestion we continue waiting to act. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #26
EXACTLY! Cannon's dismissal of the case might still be overturned, sending the case back into court Attilatheblond Jan 2025 #40
There are two Cannon items in front of the 11th now Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2025 #43
Dont put it past him... Gnomad Jan 2025 #63
Jack Smith could've gotten her fired, too bad, so sad, he's resigning Gnomad Jan 2025 #58
Splitting the baby C_U_L8R Jan 2025 #13
NOTE THE UPDATE: THE CLASSIFIED STUFF IS GOING TO BE RELEASED TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE LEADERS BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #17
Never to be seen by us. Boomerproud Jan 2025 #47
Do you have security clearance to review "classified documents" BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #51
So everything outside of the corrupt Judge Cannon's case is to be released. Mister Ed Jan 2025 #18
Part of the stuff supposedly "blocked" by her will be released to the Chair/Ranking Members of the Judiciary Committee BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 #31
At this stage of the game, knowing Garland, gab13by13 Jan 2025 #19
The Just Us department. Looking out for what's best for trump. Autumn Jan 2025 #21
Does this surprise anybody? NT Firestorm49 Jan 2025 #28
Nope. orangecrush Jan 2025 #55
Likely to protect ongoing and future cases. Joinfortmill Jan 2025 #37
Merrick the Meek, must protect the convicted felon and not look "political". republianmushroom Jan 2025 #39
Merrick Garland is the worst AG in American history. lark Jan 2025 #41
Release it all now kimbutgar Jan 2025 #42
Nothing released yet in the Justice Dept Special Counsel portal. C0RI0LANUS Jan 2025 #44
Are they gonna release it or waste time advertising they're gonna release it? Deuxcents Jan 2025 #46
Translation: AverageOldGuy Jan 2025 #50
Adverbs, prepositions and conjuntives only Bobstandard Jan 2025 #52
I'm sure that the Republican ranking members Mblaze Jan 2025 #53
Shocked. Shocked, I tell you. Scrivener7 Jan 2025 #56
The election interference case is Deminpenn Jan 2025 #64
How typical. n/t malthaussen Jan 2025 #67
Who's a weasel............ LPBBEAR Jan 2025 #68

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
3. There is a court order holding back the second volume. That it is bogus doesn't mean it must not be respected
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:25 AM
Jan 2025

Cannon's court order holding up release at this time pending 11th Circuit Court decision is kind of bogus, but regardless it has to be respected until successfully appealed or the 11th rules which may happen soon before any appeal against Cannon's "decision" progresses.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
12. Because it is a court order. People like Giuliani don't respect them, but law abiding citizens do
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:31 AM
Jan 2025

That is to say, law abiding citizens respect the law until it become untenable, i.e. until there is a revolution or some kind of large societal failure, or until some form of civil protest is appropriate, etc.

Non-law abiding people (hard to call them citizens even if they are), non-law abiding people ignore the law because they think most of it is bogus. Hence tRump, Roy Cohn, Muck, Roger Stone, Stewart Rhodes, Giuliani, etc.
 

Unladen Swallow

(491 posts)
27. Exactly
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:45 AM
Jan 2025

If we won't have the rule of law, we have nothing. Someone has to take the high road, no matter how painful.

dem4decades

(14,016 posts)
54. That's the problem, Democrats obey the rules and then take it up the nose when the pukes don't.
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:42 PM
Jan 2025

When has Trump ever obeyed the rules? What price had he actually paid?

Grins

(9,435 posts)
61. Too late.! By the time "a court" reverses it...
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 02:21 PM
Jan 2025

...the perpetrators will be in positions of power and it will never be seen again. Just what the Republicans want.

If the positions were reversed, Republicans would use - or create! - a loophole - and do it anyway!

 

claudette

(5,455 posts)
29. But if the
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:47 AM
Jan 2025

court order is BOGUS (definition. Fake. Counterfeit ) it doesn’t deserve respect in my view.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
30. The order is not fake or counterfeit. It is based on bogus reasoning (in my view) & I think it will be overruled
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:49 AM
Jan 2025

Thus I used a figure of speech calling 'it' bogus and perhaps I should have been more specific.
 

endgenocide

(166 posts)
32. Because it is a court order
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:52 AM
Jan 2025

I agree though I'm pretty Sure Loose Cannon's court order put the brakes on releasing the J6 report as well. why can Garland ingore only part of her order?

https://www.npr.org/2025/01/07/g-s1-41398/aileen-cannon-jack-smith-trump

DENVERPOPS

(13,003 posts)
66. In simpler terms
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 03:51 PM
Jan 2025

could you imagine an NFL football game, where the refs were forbidden from calling ANY penalties on one of the teams, regardless of how egregious?????

FBaggins

(28,705 posts)
36. Because prison time is unappealing?
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 12:09 PM
Jan 2025

You can ask a higher court to overturn her... but you can't ignore her.

Literally having contempt for her rulings may be justified... but it makes it hard to avoid being found in contempt.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
35. Easy for you to ask someone to take the federal penitentiary chip for your impatience
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 12:05 PM
Jan 2025

Yes, I know you weren't specific, but what is left is a few day wait to see how the 11th Circuit rules. Thus what you suggest is leaking rather than waiting.

Regardless, I think the whole report should be released before tRump is inaugurated.

SurfLiberal

(30 posts)
38. Biden can release the report anytime
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 12:18 PM
Jan 2025

And he has immunity, bestowed upon him by the Supreme Court, since it is in the scope of his official duties.

 

NotHardly

(2,705 posts)
57. Can't let the poors know the lies & corruption they live under
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:51 PM
Jan 2025

Garland exposed, through his inaction, the hollowing out of justice and the feckless attitude of towards its responsibility to the public. Garland and his ilk are POS weaponized by Republicans. And you ain't seen nothing yet.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
5. The second volume release is out of his hands for a few days at least
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:25 AM
Jan 2025

Yes, he is spineless but this is not that.
48. On one hand we have someone who tried to end democracy.
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:05 PM
Jan 2025

On the other hand we have two men who moved boxes as told by their boss.

Should we let evil prevail? The two men weren't involved in January 6th, so why should the evidence against the individual who committed treason be thrown out because of an unrelated case? Actually, a delay will work as well as a SCOTUS decision in T***p's favor. Once he puts his hand on the Official God Bless America Bible (available for $59 -- $1,000 for a copy allegedly signed by the Big Kuna himself*), he's essentially king and all the documents disappear, along with anyone who has seen them.

Oh, that's right -- Judge Cannon has her eye on the prize, a seat on the SCOTUS. What she doesn't realize is that once Felon47 is sworn in and virtually untouchable he'll toss her in the trash bin with his first two wives. In Trumpworld loyalty only flows one way -- toward him.

Where is Daniel Ellsberg when we need him?

thesquanderer

(12,992 posts)
65. No evidence is being thrown out.
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 03:20 PM
Jan 2025

re: "The two men weren't involved in January 6th, so why should the evidence against the individual who committed treason be thrown out because of an unrelated case?"

The two men were involved in the classified docs case... that evidence isn't being thrown out, but for now is only being released to the Judiciary Committee leadership (because of the legal situation of those two men).

As for the unrelated Jan 6 case, that evidence is being released.

(Based on the OP.)

lastlib

(28,170 posts)
9. I shudder to think what Gym-Rat Jordan will do with it.....
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:28 AM
Jan 2025

Let's hope the D's in the Senate will get their take on it out first.

Gnomad

(10 posts)
49. Gym Jordan is in the House, this will be released to Senate Judiciary
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:08 PM
Jan 2025

...and the new session has new leadership.
Chair Grassley is the worst of the worst.... he was standing by waiting for Pence to be assassinated for his own promotion to Prez of Senate to announce Trump as winner in 2020.
I dont expect Grassley to release a damning report on trump.

Schiff surprised me by not objecting to DISQUALIFIED trump at Electoral confirmation.
He was a star on House J6 Committee
This is going to SUCK:
The new Senate Judiciary Leadership
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/

(They have Grassley listed as a DEMOCRAT, bc they have to lie about everything?)

lastlib

(28,170 posts)
60. aw sh*t, forgot about new Congress.....
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 02:20 PM
Jan 2025

Damn.

But I thought the post said it would be released to the House as well. And I was under the impession that members from both parties would have access. What do I know?

Gnomad

(10 posts)
62. My bad...
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 02:39 PM
Jan 2025

The OP article says
"The Justice Department said it would proceed with plans to release the first of two volumes centered on the election interference case but would make the classified documents section of the report available only to the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees for their private review as long as the case against Trump's co-defendants is ongoing."

Botany

(77,208 posts)
10. Garland is a shit. .... covering up Trump's crimes just like Bill Barr.
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:28 AM
Jan 2025

We need to see all of it along with the Mueller report, Trump’s phone call to Zelenskyy
and his talk with Vlad Putin in Helsinki.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
14. Wait a few days. Fair chance the 11th Circuit will overrule Cannon, again. They might even reinstate the case. . .nt
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:33 AM
Jan 2025
 

Think. Again.

(22,456 posts)
16. No, waiting has been our mistake all along.
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:37 AM
Jan 2025

We are about to install a nazi administration.

We should have been proactive and aggressive to stop this all along.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
20. Easy for you to say someone should risk years in federal penitentiary because you can't wait a brief time. . . nt
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:38 AM
Jan 2025

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
25. Daniel Ellsberg is topic of this subthread, which is what was in mind. He was charged w 115 years, but not convicted. nt
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:43 AM
Jan 2025
 

Think. Again.

(22,456 posts)
26. cool, I was responding to your suggestion we continue waiting to act.
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:45 AM
Jan 2025

ETA: but are you suggesting we wait a bit before someone leaks?

Easy for you to say someone should risk years in federal penitentiary after waiting a brief time.

Attilatheblond

(8,803 posts)
40. EXACTLY! Cannon's dismissal of the case might still be overturned, sending the case back into court
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 12:29 PM
Jan 2025

Everybody wants what they want right now, but that isn't prudent in this case.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
43. There are two Cannon items in front of the 11th now
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 12:35 PM
Jan 2025

1) Her dismissal of documents case, without prejudice. Thus it can be reinstated, perhaps in front of another judge.

2) Her blocking the report, which was made when no case was before her.

They have overruled her previously. I do not think even tRump would nominate her for SCotUS with her record.

Gnomad

(10 posts)
63. Dont put it past him...
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 02:48 PM
Jan 2025

Trump would put Denny Crane on scotus if he didnt have somebody worse lined up

Gnomad

(10 posts)
58. Jack Smith could've gotten her fired, too bad, so sad, he's resigning
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 02:09 PM
Jan 2025

By " sending the case back into court" I hope back to a different, more qualified judge.
Cannon is a turd for trump. So is Pam Bondi (also Floriduh) Trump's new us attorney general pick.
It's not like we need this case to impeach him. We had everything we needed to Disqualify him and slept on it.
Yes this would be an Espionage Act case, by the end of it... he gets away with everything, even Enemy of the State and Treason. I am sure of it.
Who would take up the case?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/special-counsel-jack-smith-team-resign-trump-takes-office-rcna179928

BumRushDaShow

(169,137 posts)
17. NOTE THE UPDATE: THE CLASSIFIED STUFF IS GOING TO BE RELEASED TO THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE LEADERS
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:37 AM
Jan 2025

BumRushDaShow

(169,137 posts)
51. Do you have security clearance to review "classified documents"
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:17 PM
Jan 2025

or even anything "sensitive"?

I know for my federal job, I had to get clearance for "Level 6" (Public Trust/High Risk) due to some of the info that I handled, and that required a periodic background checks and was not even for anything "Top Secret".

Mister Ed

(6,918 posts)
18. So everything outside of the corrupt Judge Cannon's case is to be released.
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:38 AM
Jan 2025

That's very good news, is it not?

In regards to that remaining case: does the DOJ have any legal means of overriding Judge Cannon's order? Perhaps DU'ers with legal expertise can weigh in on that question.

BumRushDaShow

(169,137 posts)
31. Part of the stuff supposedly "blocked" by her will be released to the Chair/Ranking Members of the Judiciary Committee
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:51 AM
Jan 2025

because some of it is obviously "Classified" (which is why it was called "the Classified Documents case" ) and they have CLEARANCE. They will probably review it in a SCIF.

gab13by13

(32,121 posts)
19. At this stage of the game, knowing Garland,
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 11:38 AM
Jan 2025

a half loaf is better than none.

Now, if Garland redacts 3/4 of the report I won't be surprised.

As far as the stolen classified documents go, would it be proper for the National Archives to give a semi-detailed report about what documents are still missing? Never mind; wishful thinking.

republianmushroom

(22,282 posts)
39. Merrick the Meek, must protect the convicted felon and not look "political".
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 12:22 PM
Jan 2025

Like Mueller report, redacted and not published with out being redacted.

47 months and counting

lark

(26,067 posts)
41. Merrick Garland is the worst AG in American history.
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 12:30 PM
Jan 2025

I hope his life destructs immediately - it's what he totally deserves and has worked hard to accomplish. Is it bribes or threats or just pure cowardice?

C0RI0LANUS

(3,017 posts)
44. Nothing released yet in the Justice Dept Special Counsel portal.
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 12:47 PM
Jan 2025
https://www.justice.gov/sco-smith


President Donald Trumpf's official portrait will be hung in every US domestic and overseas facility in the world after 20 Jan 2025.

AverageOldGuy

(3,771 posts)
50. Translation:
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:12 PM
Jan 2025

What DOJ said:

. . . but will keep under wraps for now the rest of the record focused on the president-elect's hoarding of classified documents . . .


What this really means:

Trump's AG will appoint a special team, equipped with high-speed, high-capacity, truck-mounted shredders who will shred the last four years' worth of DOJ documents that contain the name "Trump".


Bobstandard

(2,276 posts)
52. Adverbs, prepositions and conjuntives only
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:19 PM
Jan 2025

“In fairness to the defendants, while serving the interests of the American people, all nouns, verbs, and adverbs will be redacted. “

Mblaze

(1,012 posts)
53. I'm sure that the Republican ranking members
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 01:25 PM
Jan 2025

will refuse to read that report. Ignorance is truly bliss for the Right. It informs their world view.

Deminpenn

(17,461 posts)
64. The election interference case is
Wed Jan 8, 2025, 02:58 PM
Jan 2025

much more significant for the public to know.

We all know most of the details of the classified documents case and have seen the pictures. Are there some interesting things we don't know in the report? Probably, but eventually it will all come out.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Justice Department says i...