US Supreme Court turns away gun law challenges in Delaware, Maryland
Source: Reuters
January 13, 2025 10:30 AM EST Updated 5 hours ago
WASHINGTON, Jan. 13 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a bid to block Delaware's prohibition on assault-style rifles and large-capacity ammunition magazines, as well as a challenge to Maryland's handgun licensing requirements, sidestepping two cases involving the divisive issue of gun rights.
The justices turned away an appeal by a group of gun enthusiasts and firearm advocacy groups of a lower court's refusal to issue a preliminary injunction against the Democratic-led Delaware's ban on "assault weapons" and magazines that can hold more than 17 rounds. Such weapons have been used in numerous mass shootings in the United States.
The justices also rejected an appeal by a gun rights group called Maryland Shall Issue and other plaintiffs of a lower court's ruling that upheld the state's licensing law as permissible under the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
While the justices declined to hear these two cases, the court did not act on two separate appeals involving challenges to Maryland's ban on assault weapons and one in Rhode Island on large capacity ammunition magazines.
The Supreme Court, with its 6-3 conservative majority, has taken an expansive view of gun rights in major rulings dating back to 2008. Delaware's gun safety laws, enacted in 2022, ban various semi-automatic "assault" long guns including the AR-15 and AK47, but allow those who owned such weapons before the law to keep them under certain conditions. The measure prohibiting large-capacity magazines applies to those devices owned before the law took effect. The challengers in the case are state residents who are seeking to purchase the banned guns or magazines, a firearms dealer, the Firearms Policy Coalition and Second Amendment Foundation.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-supreme-court-turns-away-gun-law-challenges-delaware-maryland-2025-01-13/

rampartd
(1,670 posts)ceo s are now targets, so i expect a little less open carry frenzy.
moniss
(6,617 posts)didn't turn away the law but rather the appeal of a lower court denial for a preliminary injunction. The case in the lower court can now proceed with the law in effect but the decision and any appeal of it could come to the SC again. The good news being that for awhile at least the law will be in effect.
We have to read carefully at what step in the judicial process the case is in.