Trump again demands new trials in E. Jean Carroll cases, complains of 'pile-on' with 'inadmissible' character evidence
Source: Law & Crime
Jan 14th, 2025, 2:27 pm
President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday asked a federal court of appeals to reconsider taking on his request for a new trial in the defamation case brought and won by writer E. Jean Carroll.
In December 2024, a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit turned down a substantially similar request. The panel determined the district court had not made any error or combination of errors that affected Trumps substantial rights. Now, Trump is asking for the full court to consider the civil case and, necessarily, to reconsider the argument about errors anew.
In May 2023, a jury of Manhattanites found that Trump sexually abused Carroll in the dressing room of New York City department store Bergdorf Goodman sometime in the late 1990s and later defamed her when he strongly denied the allegations and also denied ever knowing Carroll, to the press. While the civil sexual assault finding has zero force of criminal guilt, it was essentially cited as a necessary precursor to the defamation lawsuit. In that first case, the jury ordered Trump to pay his victim $5 million in damages.
In January, another Manhattan jury ruled in Carrolls favor over a markedly similar set of legal complaints. Jurors would eventually award Carroll $83.3 million in that case. Trump is asking for new trials in both cases.
Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/passion-and-prejudice-instead-of-the-law-and-evidence-trump-again-demands-new-trials-in-e-jean-carroll-cases-complains-of-pile-on-with-inadmissible-character-evidence/
Full headline: Passion and prejudice instead of the law and evidence: Trump again demands new trials in E. Jean Carroll cases, complains of pile-on with inadmissible character evidence
Link to MOTION (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.60504/gov.uscourts.ca2.60504.184.0.pdf
sakabatou
(43,634 posts)tanyev
(45,040 posts)Toddler of the United States.
patphil
(7,268 posts)Orrex
(64,539 posts)Comfortably_Numb
(4,135 posts)niyad
(121,562 posts)PortTack
(35,104 posts)IbogaProject
(3,973 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,344 posts)He has to submit it as part of his felony conviction.
sop
(12,151 posts)BumRushDaShow
(146,078 posts)in order to appeal so eventually....
muriel_volestrangler
(102,856 posts)from trying to overturn a legal verdict involving him. He shouldn't be getting involved in legal fights - that's the paper-thin "justification" for giving him immunity.
Igel
(36,476 posts)The DOJ won't prosecute. I mean, it's a strange thing for an employee to prosecute as part of his official duties his boss. All Executive authority comes from the President, the DOJ is part of the executive branch (we only have 3, and the DOJ can't be judicial and isn't legislative).
The Carroll case is civil. The DOJ, federal DAs, state or county DAs are not involved.
In other words, "it's personal." And case law says that kind of legal wrangle against a sitting president is just plain okay.
et tu
(1,917 posts)according to the trumpscript, you can keep
getting new trials until you get the verdict
you want. gee what a wonderful rule of 'my law'