Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(146,078 posts)
Tue Jan 14, 2025, 04:34 PM Jan 14

Trump again demands new trials in E. Jean Carroll cases, complains of 'pile-on' with 'inadmissible' character evidence

Source: Law & Crime

Jan 14th, 2025, 2:27 pm


President-elect Donald Trump on Tuesday asked a federal court of appeals to reconsider taking on his request for a new trial in the defamation case brought — and won — by writer E. Jean Carroll.

In December 2024, a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit turned down a substantially similar request. The panel determined the district court had not made any error or “combination of” errors that “affected” Trump’s “substantial rights.” Now, Trump is asking for the full court to consider the civil case — and, necessarily, to reconsider the argument about errors anew.

In May 2023, a jury of Manhattanites found that Trump sexually abused Carroll in the dressing room of New York City department store Bergdorf Goodman sometime in the late 1990s — and later defamed her when he strongly denied the allegations and also denied ever knowing Carroll, to the press. While the civil sexual assault finding has zero force of criminal guilt, it was essentially cited as a necessary precursor to the defamation lawsuit. In that first case, the jury ordered Trump to pay his victim $5 million in damages.

In January, another Manhattan jury ruled in Carroll’s favor over a markedly similar set of legal complaints. Jurors would eventually award Carroll $83.3 million in that case. Trump is asking for new trials in both cases.

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/passion-and-prejudice-instead-of-the-law-and-evidence-trump-again-demands-new-trials-in-e-jean-carroll-cases-complains-of-pile-on-with-inadmissible-character-evidence/



Full headline: ‘Passion and prejudice instead of the law and evidence’: Trump again demands new trials in E. Jean Carroll cases, complains of ‘pile-on’ with ‘inadmissible’ character evidence

Link to MOTION (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca2.60504/gov.uscourts.ca2.60504.184.0.pdf
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump again demands new trials in E. Jean Carroll cases, complains of 'pile-on' with 'inadmissible' character evidence (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jan 14 OP
That's all he does: whine and complain when he loses sakabatou Jan 14 #1
TOTUS. Whiny little TOTUS. tanyev Jan 14 #11
LOVE IT! niyad Jan 15 #14
The whiner and chief is still at it. patphil Jan 14 #2
Holy fuck why doesn't he just die already? Orrex Jan 14 #3
Your keyboard to Odin's ears. Take this piece of shit NOW and help clean up the planet. Comfortably_Numb Jan 14 #8
Exactly. Come on, cholesterol, do your damned job! niyad Jan 15 #15
Not just no...f..k NO! PortTack Jan 14 #4
If he didn't know her why refuse a DNA test? IbogaProject Jan 14 #5
NY police will soon have his dna. truthisfreedom Jan 14 #10
I don't think Carroll will ever see a dime from Trump. sop Jan 14 #6
He had to put the money up in escrow BumRushDaShow Jan 14 #7
If authorities are forbidden from prosecuting a president, then the president should be forbidden muriel_volestrangler Jan 14 #9
Easy answer to that one. Igel Jan 14 #13
'trumplaw' et tu Jan 14 #12

muriel_volestrangler

(102,856 posts)
9. If authorities are forbidden from prosecuting a president, then the president should be forbidden
Tue Jan 14, 2025, 05:36 PM
Jan 14

from trying to overturn a legal verdict involving him. He shouldn't be getting involved in legal fights - that's the paper-thin "justification" for giving him immunity.

Igel

(36,476 posts)
13. Easy answer to that one.
Tue Jan 14, 2025, 09:51 PM
Jan 14

The DOJ won't prosecute. I mean, it's a strange thing for an employee to prosecute as part of his official duties his boss. All Executive authority comes from the President, the DOJ is part of the executive branch (we only have 3, and the DOJ can't be judicial and isn't legislative).

The Carroll case is civil. The DOJ, federal DAs, state or county DAs are not involved.

In other words, "it's personal." And case law says that kind of legal wrangle against a sitting president is just plain okay.

et tu

(1,917 posts)
12. 'trumplaw'
Tue Jan 14, 2025, 06:53 PM
Jan 14

according to the trumpscript, you can keep
getting new trials until you get the verdict
you want. gee what a wonderful rule of 'my law'

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump again demands new t...