Senate advances Gabbard's nomination to become DNI
Source: Roll Call
Posted February 10, 2025 at 7:32pm
Tulsi Gabbard, the nominee to become director of national intelligence, is one step closer to confirmation after the Senate crossed a procedural hurdle Monday. Senators voted 52-46 to approve a cloture motion on Gabbards nomination. The vote on confirmation could come as soon as late Tuesday unless members agree to shorten the time for debate.
Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., praised Gabbard in a floor speech ahead of the vote, highlighting her plans to focus on identifying and eliminating redundancies and inefficiencies as well as her intent to prosecute leakers to the full extent of the law. In recent years, there have been some significant intelligence failures, and these failures arent confined to one agency or one part of the world, Thune said. The intelligence community needs to refocus on its core mission: collecting intelligence and providing unbiased analysis of that information. Thats what Tulsi Gabbard is committed to ensuring if she is confirmed.
Gabbard, who represented Hawaii in the House as a Democrat for eight years, faced bipartisan scrutiny during a confirmation hearing in the Senate Intelligence Committee last month. Chief among lawmakers concerns was her support for whistleblower Edward Snowden and a 2017 trip to Syria in which she met with then-leader Bashar Assad.
But Republicans moved her through the committee on a party-line vote. The Monday cloture vote was also along party lines, with Sens. John Fetterman, D-Pa., and Thom Tillis, R-N.C., missing the vote. Democrats on Monday again raised concerns about Gabbard. Senate Intelligence Vice Chair Mark Warner, D-Va., said ahead of the vote that his concerns about Gabbards potential confirmation have been heightened by recent Trump administration actions impacting intelligence and related agencies.
Read more: https://rollcall.com/2025/02/10/senate-advances-gabbards-nomination-to-become-dni/
Next up would be the final debate and vote by the full Senate.

FBaggins
(28,022 posts)but a very effective one
Best_man23
(5,199 posts)That would be the sound of safes and locking file cabinets being slammed shut and locked.
sop
(13,014 posts)JT45242
(3,186 posts)Throw in criminal Kash Patel and the old days of criminal accomplices like Billy Barr look like NObel laureates.
Anyone who hoped that even 2 rethuglicans would put country over party was foolhardy. She is literally a russian asset and everyone knows it. They just put her in charge of national intelligence.
Leakers will be anyone who points out that she and Mango Mussolini are giving state secrets to (in no particular order) -- the Russians, Chinese, Saudi, Emiratis, North Koreans, and anyone else who will allow Mango to build a hotel somewhere tax free.
surfered
(5,400 posts)WestMichRad
(2,119 posts)Our future Director of National Stupidity.
speak easy
(11,267 posts)There are three solid votes against them Collins, McConnell and Murkowski.
McConnell will recruit at least one national security hawk to join him and sink Gabbard., RFK Jr.'s chances and even more dim. McConnell who contracted polio as a kid is a definite no, and he will be joined by one or more anti-abortion zealots. Trump will have to accept the anti-abortion votes. It is critical to base.
24601
(4,059 posts)break the tie. That happened with the vote to confirm Hegseth as Secretary of Defense.
thesquanderer
(12,523 posts)BumRushDaShow
(148,643 posts)If they allowed a disgrace like Hegseth through (and that was with the same 3 (R) objections), then she would be a shoo-in.
She made it out of the Senate Intelligence Committee intact.
Republicans
Tom Cotton
James E. Risch
Susan M. Collins
John Cornyn
Jerry Moran
James Lankford
M. Michael Rounds
Todd Young
Ted Budd
The only other one who has blinked in the past is Lankford, but he and Todd Young (the latter pressured after also expressing concern) have indicated complete support.
speak easy
(11,267 posts)FBaggins
(28,022 posts)Current odds say shell get all but one republican. You could make a fortune betting against her if youre right - because the odds are better than 50:1
Murkowski announced last night that shes a yes for Gabbard -
Link to tweet
Polybius
(19,382 posts)Not sure how you missed it, as it was all over DU.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143388073
Timeflyer
(3,032 posts)Hi, my name is [NAME] and Im a constituent from [CITY, ZIP].
I'm calling to demand [REP/SEN NAME] oppose Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence. Her sympathy towards Bashar al-Assad and parroting of Kremlin propaganda make her a dangerous choice to lead the U.S. Intelligence Community.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
IF LEAVING VOICEMAIL: Please leave your full street address to ensure your call is tallied.
turbinetree
(25,840 posts)and show if they had voted for the Constitution in 2019 and 2021 and thrown this fucker out on his ear and we would not have these corrupt minions ........but these fuckers voted party over country every fucking time.......................never again do I want to hear them tell men and woman that died defending against fascism from days gone past that they stood behind them and the Constitution that they died for............and what is really classic there are two present JAGS sitting in the senate that are hypocrites..........Moscow Mitch McConnel and Graham cracker..................now what secrets will be turned over to Vlad............JFC..............
LeftInTX
(32,712 posts)Owens
(445 posts)and go after Democrats. Just watch
Bengus81
(8,283 posts)BumRushDaShow
(148,643 posts)The GOP has 53 members and at least 52 seem to be fine with it. They apparently know the whip count because Vance will be out of the country when they vote so there will obviously be no tie.
Bengus81
(8,283 posts)Maybe he will...maybe he won't. His record gets worse as it goes.
BumRushDaShow
(148,643 posts)by Ashleigh Fields - 02/07/25 10:00 AM ET
Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) said he will vote against two of President Trumps most controversial Cabinet nominees: Tulsi Gabbard, his pick for director of national intelligence, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services.
I have met with most of the cabinet nominees and have carefully watched their confirmation hearings, Fetterman wrote Thursday in a statement on the social platform X.
After considering whats at stake, I have voted against moving forward to the confirmation of Ms. Gabbard and Mr. Kennedy, and will be voting NO on their confirmations.
Both nominees recently advanced with recommendations from their respective committees in party-line votes.
(snip)