Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(148,647 posts)
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 01:43 PM Feb 11

Appeals court grants DOJ bid to drop prosecution of Trump's former co-defendants in classified docs case

Source: Politico

02/11/2025 10:40 AM EST


A federal appeals court has put an end to the last remnant of special counsel Jack Smith’s criminal prosecutions that once targeted President Donald Trump. The Atlanta-based 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday granted the Justice Department’s bid to abandon obstruction of justice and false statement charges against two Trump allies accused of helping Trump cover-up the presence of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.

The dismissal was largely a formality: The Justice Department moved to drop the appeal last month after the department came under the control of Trump appointees, including a lawyer who was a defense attorney for Trump in his criminal cases.

The Justice Department, under then-Attorney General Merrick Garland, had been appealing a July ruling from U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissing the criminal case against Trump, his longtime personal aide Walt Nauta and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Oliveira. Cannon ruled Smith’s appointment as special counsel was unconstitutional.

Following Trump’s election in November, the Justice Department dropped its bid to revive the charges against Trump, citing a longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president. However, prosecutors’ effort to reinstate the case against Nauta and De Oliveira continued until DOJ reversed course last month. The 11th Circuit, for unexplained reasons, waited nearly two weeks to grant DOJ’s request. The earlier bid seeking to dismiss Trump from the appeal was granted by the same court in just one day.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/11/classified-documents-case-justice-department-016141

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court grants DOJ bid to drop prosecution of Trump's former co-defendants in classified docs case (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Feb 11 OP
48 months and counting republianmushroom Feb 11 #1
Blame John Roberts the Ultimate Decider BumRushDaShow Feb 11 #2
No, I'll blame the man that was suppose to protect this country and in my republianmushroom Feb 11 #3
Again BumRushDaShow Feb 11 #5
There were many laws trump broke but the DOJ elected to ignore them. republianmushroom Feb 11 #10
I'll tell ya what, I'd go even higher. malthaussen Feb 11 #9
I'll never forgive Biden for making this appointment. PSPS Feb 11 #4
No. The demise is due to Trump and Republicans betraying their country. travelingthrulife Feb 11 #7
Shameful behavior by our courts and legal system travelingthrulife Feb 11 #6
"Criminal prosecutions that once targeted President Trump." malthaussen Feb 11 #8
I think in this case, it's a style sheet to describe and address him (and his position) in the present BumRushDaShow Feb 11 #11
Well, that's a good point... malthaussen Feb 11 #13
Well at least sites like "Politico" or "Roll Call" BumRushDaShow Feb 11 #14
And Justice for all, why, because no man is above the law. HA HA HA republianmushroom Feb 11 #12

BumRushDaShow

(148,647 posts)
2. Blame John Roberts the Ultimate Decider
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 02:01 PM
Feb 11
Chief justice Roberts pushed for quick immunity ruling in Trump’s favor – report

Anna Betts
Mon 16 Sep 2024 12.50 EDT


John Roberts Jr used his position as the US supreme court’s chief justice to urge his colleagues to rule quickly – and in favor – of Donald Trump ahead of the decision that granted him and other presidents immunity for official acts, according to a New York Times investigation published on Sunday.

The new report provides details about what was happening behind the scenes in the country’s highest court during the three recent supreme court decisions centering on – and generally favoring – the Republican former president.

Based on leaked memos, documentation of the proceedings, and interviews with court insiders, the Times report suggests that Roberts – who was appointed to the supreme court during Republican George W Bush’s presidency – took an unusually active role in the three cases in question. And he wrote the majority opinions on all three.

In addition to the presidential immunity ruling, the decisions collectively barred states from removing any official – including Trump – from a federal ballot as well as declaring the government had overstepped with respect to obstruction of justice charges filed against participants of the 6 January 2021 attack that the former president’s supporters aimed at Congress.

(snip)


republianmushroom

(19,003 posts)
3. No, I'll blame the man that was suppose to protect this country and in my
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 02:05 PM
Feb 11

opinion didn't do his job. That is my opinion.
Now there is a lot to share the blame but I'll start with Merrick the Meek.

BumRushDaShow

(148,647 posts)
5. Again
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 04:21 PM
Feb 11

the "final word", as you are seeing with the cases being filed the past couple weeks, ARE THE COURTS.

If you actually think that the current 6 RW loons on the SCOTUS would have suddenly allowed any trial to go forward, even if a Grand Jury had done the charges on January 7th, 2021, there is that bridge in NY that I can sell you.

republianmushroom

(19,003 posts)
10. There were many laws trump broke but the DOJ elected to ignore them.
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 07:14 PM
Feb 11

Department of Justice my ass, that is MY opinion .

malthaussen

(18,014 posts)
9. I'll tell ya what, I'd go even higher.
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 05:12 PM
Feb 11

The AG is a member of the President's cabinet. Yeah, I know, there's a lot of blather about how it's supposed to be a non-political post and the AG serves "The Law" and "The Citizens" and not the President. It's bullshit. It was incumbent upon the President of the US to direct the AG to expedite the investigation/prosecution of the person responsible for a violent attempt to overthrow the US Government. If the AG dragged his feet, then the President should have damned well fired him and put somebody in the job who would actually do it. They all have an obligation to defend the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and rolling over and playing dead is not defense. Mr Truman had a sign on his desk reading "The Buck Stops Here," and that fact has not changed in 70-odd years. The Government failed in its primary duty, to protect the Government.

-- Mal

PSPS

(14,359 posts)
4. I'll never forgive Biden for making this appointment.
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 02:18 PM
Feb 11

Garland's appointment was merely to make up for McConnell scuttling his appointment to the supreme court. While he might have been a good jurist on the supreme court, he was completely out of his depth as head of the DOJ. One could easily claim that the demise of our democracy is a direct result of Biden's horrible decision to make this appointment.

travelingthrulife

(1,754 posts)
7. No. The demise is due to Trump and Republicans betraying their country.
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 04:31 PM
Feb 11

Start blaming the right people.

malthaussen

(18,014 posts)
8. "Criminal prosecutions that once targeted President Trump."
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 05:05 PM
Feb 11

Those were criminal investigations of Citizen Donald Trump, who was not President at the time. It may seem like it's a distinction without a difference, but phrased the way Politico does, it sounds overtly political.

-- Mal

BumRushDaShow

(148,647 posts)
11. I think in this case, it's a style sheet to describe and address him (and his position) in the present
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 07:20 PM
Feb 11

not when he was under investigation.

And actually, until January 20, 2021, he WAS still (purportedly) "President", which was through 2 weeks post-January 6, when the rumblings of an investigation by Democrats, who had just taken the Senate by a nose, were underway, and while he was still in the position.

And in fact, he WAS impeached for a 2nd time for "insurrection" (although not yet tried) BEFORE he left office in 2021.

Lawmakers called back to D.C. to vote on Trump's impeachment, removal under 25th Amendment

Jan. 11, 2021, 8:15 AM EST / Updated Jan. 11, 2021, 6:38 PM EST
By Alex Moe, Rebecca Shabad and Dareh Gregorian


WASHINGTON — House Democrats plan to vote on a measure calling on Vice President Mike Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment against President Donald Trump and on an article of impeachment in the next two days.

Democrats introduced the impeachment article Monday charging Trump with "incitement of insurrection" in urging his supporters to march on the U.S. Capitol last week, as well as a resolution that calls on Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment to the Constitution to remove him from office before Jan. 20.

The House will vote on the 25th Amendment measure as early as Tuesday and on the article of impeachment Wednesday — one week to the day after the deadly mayhem that has shaken Washington to the core and a week before the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden.

The impeachment measure, which has more than 200 Democratic co-sponsors, says Trump "gravely endangered the security of the United States and its institutions of government." "He threatened the integrity of the democratic system, interfered with the peaceful transition of power, and imperiled a coequal branch of government," it says. "He thereby betrayed his trust as president, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States."

(snip)


The 10 Republicans who voted to impeach Donald Trump

Staff and agency
Wed 13 Jan 2021 20.10 EST


Ten Republican members of the US House of Representatives voted to impeach Donald Trump over the deadly insurrection at the Capitol, making it the most bipartisan presidential impeachment in US history.

The break with the president stood in sharp contrast to the unanimous support for Trump among House Republicans when he was first impeached by Democrats in 2019.

All Democrats who voted supported impeachment, while 197 Republicans voted no.

The Republican votes made it a historic moment. In comparison, five Democrats voted to impeach Bill Clinton in 1998.

(snip)

malthaussen

(18,014 posts)
13. Well, that's a good point...
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 09:16 PM
Feb 11

... but it still sounds slanted to me. I guess I expect every news report to be slanted, and after all, what would one expect of a site called "Politico?"

-- Mal

BumRushDaShow

(148,647 posts)
14. Well at least sites like "Politico" or "Roll Call"
Tue Feb 11, 2025, 10:21 PM
Feb 11

don't devote 1/2 of their main webpage real estate on Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift or Ye or the latest on Blake Lively or whoever.

Bread and Circuses.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals court grants DOJ ...