Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(148,540 posts)
Sat Feb 15, 2025, 08:19 AM Feb 15

Federal judge hands Musk's DOGE a win on data access at 3 agencies

Source: ABC News

February 15, 2025, 12:05 AM


Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency can continue to access sensitive records from at least three federal agencies after a federal judge in Washington denied a request to block Musk's budget-slashing team from the Department of Labor, Department of Health and Human Services and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

U.S. District Judge John Bates, in a late-night ruling, denied a request made by a group of unions and nonprofits to issue a temporary order blocking DOGE from the sensitive records maintained by the three agencies.

Elon Musk has repeatedly targeted Bates over the last week on X – including calling for the judge's impeachment – after Bates issued a decision in another case ordering multiple agencies to restore public health data after the Trump administration suddenly removed it. "There needs to be an immediate wave of judicial impeachments, not just one," Musk wrote on Wednesday in response to a post about the judge. The tech billionaire celebrated Friday's ruling in a post on X.

The judge's decision came down to the question of whether DOGE has the authority to "detail" its people to individual parts of the federal government where – as employees of that department or agency – the individuals associated with DOGE could legally access the sensitive records. To have that authority, DOGE would have to be considered an "agency" in the eyes of the law, Bates wrote.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/federal-judge-hands-musks-doge-win-data-access/story?id=118851973



Shrub appointee. As a note, there are now many overlapping cases - some arguing the same things so will have to see how other cases pan out.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge hands Musk's DOGE a win on data access at 3 agencies (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Feb 15 OP
I hope there are grounds for an appeal. NJCher Feb 15 #1
Where's the accountability, oversight, and Congressional authority? bucolic_frolic Feb 15 #2
Now would be a good time..... Evolve Dammit Feb 15 #8
And the MAGAs thought HRC's emails were a security breech. nt Jit423 Feb 15 #3
Exactly. pazzyanne Feb 15 #4
Musk is quite the hitler mdbl Feb 15 #5
I guess doxing and threatening Figarosmom Feb 15 #6
He doxxed Kali999 Feb 15 #7
Just like the "Don." Whoever thought threatening judges could be an option?? It is. Evolve Dammit Feb 15 #9
Rachel had an excellent segment on nixons attempt to unilaterally destroy the Karadeniz Feb 15 #10

mdbl

(5,895 posts)
5. Musk is quite the hitler
Sat Feb 15, 2025, 10:55 AM
Feb 15

"Elon Musk has repeatedly targeted Bates over the last week on X – including calling for the judge's impeachment"

Sorry Eloon, that should have started with the the roberts part of the supreme court years ago.

Figarosmom

(4,723 posts)
6. I guess doxing and threatening
Sat Feb 15, 2025, 11:36 AM
Feb 15

Some judges does work.

All musk had to do is say impeach and the judge caves.

Kali999

(133 posts)
7. He doxxed
Sat Feb 15, 2025, 01:14 PM
Feb 15

Some judges daughter, photos and her irs statement signature. So its basic mob tactics.

Karadeniz

(23,932 posts)
10. Rachel had an excellent segment on nixons attempt to unilaterally destroy the
Sat Feb 15, 2025, 08:20 PM
Feb 15

Office of equal opportunity. He hired a goon to do it. However, the courts decided the actions violated congress rights. Eventually, the agency was cancelled by the legislature.

Has this judge not been informed of a case that has been on the books for decades? This decision needs to be appealed!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge hands Musk'...