Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,177 posts)
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 09:23 AM Mar 2025

Conservatives target $8 billion internet and phone subsidy. Supreme Court weighs in.

Source: USA Today

Published 5:12 a.m. ET March 25, 2025


WASHINGTON - When the pandemic prevented Arkansas River Valley residents from accessing the internet at their nearby local library, it didn't stop librarians from providing the critical service. They mounted antennas on rooftops to extend the signal. “We still do it,” said Misty Hawkins, the regional library director.

The rural population with a median family income below $46,000 depends on the reliable internet connection that its seven libraries provide through a federal program. “Lives are being changed through the distribution of a computer, through a connection, or a person being able to have resume assistance, or being able to get their GED,” Hawkins said. “That’s life changing and that’s whether or not they’re going to be able to put food on the table.”

The Supreme Court on Wednesday will hear a challenge to the $8 billion Universal Service Fund program that could jeopardize the availability and affordability of high-speed internet and phone service for millions of Americans, including those served by the Arkansas River Valley Regional Library System.

The case could also have broad repercussions for how much power Congress can delegate to federal agencies to make decisions about implementing legislation. The Supreme Court’s conservative super majority has in recent years curtailed the authority of executive agencies. And the latest challenge is part of that larger conservative effort to curb the “administrative state.”

Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/03/25/supreme-court-internet-phone-subsidy/82641812007/



So are they going to "curtail" 45 or does this only apply to Democratic administrations?
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Conservatives target $8 billion internet and phone subsidy. Supreme Court weighs in. (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Mar 2025 OP
One of Biden's best initiatives was a nationwide push to provide internet to underserved and often economically Martin68 Mar 2025 #1
Sure, because by 'conservative math' if it costs $8 billion to subsidize this ToxMarz Mar 2025 #2
So the conservatives want to deny affordable internet accesos to their red state supporters! SharonAnn Mar 2025 #3

Martin68

(26,942 posts)
1. One of Biden's best initiatives was a nationwide push to provide internet to underserved and often economically
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 09:57 AM
Mar 2025

destitute rural areas. Internet service is not a luxury - it is essential to every citizen from students in school to working adults, to retired adults. There are many services these days that cannot be accessed without an internet connection. While we are not economically disadvantaged, many of our neighbors are. We live in a rural area in Virginia with very poor mobile phone and internet service. Thanks to Biden, we now have fiber optic internet, and our less fortunate neighbors received subsidies to purchase computer equipment to access it.

ToxMarz

(2,728 posts)
2. Sure, because by 'conservative math' if it costs $8 billion to subsidize this
Tue Mar 25, 2025, 10:29 AM
Mar 2025

then they can privatize it and charge the mooks $16 billion and get away with only delivering $4 billion of services. Then maybe that will neccesitate some sort of Government subsidy to prop it up and enable people to pay for it , which is ok as long as someone is making a profit on the taxpayers money. The Governemt may even need to pay for improvements to the poor performing essential sevice, which is fine, as long as private equity owns those improvment investments. That's their definition of winning. Of course not all of it will go into the capaitalist coffers, the politicians will see a big kick back of some sort.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Conservatives target $8 b...